I just happened to run across this the other day. I initiated some research about Danforth when there was discussion of him becoming involved with Enron. Here are some items I had saved.
SEN. JOHN DANFORTH (R-MO)
On October 29, 1993, Sen. Danforth purchased between 100,000 and 200,000 dollars worth of stock in Bell Atlantic. This is the day after the Senate started their hearing on the anti-trust implications of the proposed Bell Atlantic/TCI merger.
Two weeks earlier (October 15, 1993), the national media ran a number of stories about Congress' growing concerns over the proposed Bell Atlantic/TCI merger. The Washington Post quoted Sen. Metzenbaum as saying he was considering legislation that would block the Bell Atlantic/TCI deal. Metzenbaum said, "They're going to be in a position to drive out other companies in the market and that's bad for consumers." Sen. Danforth, on the other hand, was quoted as saying that telephone companies SHOULD be able to enter the cable television business.
On June 14, 1993, Sen. Danforth purchased between 2,000 and 30,000 dollars worth of stock in Raytheon (i.e., Patriot Missiles).
On the same day (June 14), the House introduced H.R. 2401: DEFENSE DEPARTMENT AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FY94 (Became Public Law 103-160).
http://www.motherjones.com/coinop_congress/stock_congress/john_danforth.htmlDanforth Plant Science Center Is Focusing On Research To Improve Human Condition
30-Oct-2001 St Louis Post-Dispatch
Virginia Baldwin, Gilbert
In some ways, the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center resembles a private research university.
But unlike Harvard or Washington University, the Danforth Center has no athletic fields, no course schedules, no graduation.
Nor does it have many of the financial resources of a university. It has no tuition, no alumni who can be hit up for contributions, and its endowment is little more than a fund-raising plan.
It is, instead, an independent, nonprofit, research institution -- similar to the much larger Scripps Research Institute in San Diego or the Stowers Institute for Medical Research that recently opened in Kansas City. Those centers do medical research.
Roger N. Beachy, Danforth Center director, believes the Center may be unique among U.S. independent nonprofit research institutions, because it focuses solely on plant research as a way to improve the human condition.
Independent research centers forge alliances with universities and corporations and receive government grants, but they operate independently and seek ways to transfer research into practice, often through the marketplace.
On Friday, the Danforth Center will open its new building at 975 Warson Road in Creve Coeur. The opening marks a new chapter in the 3-year-old organization, bringing its scattered scientists and staff under one roof
How it started
In spring 1998, Monsanto Co., the Missouri Botanical Garden, Washington University and the University of Missouri at Columbia announced plans for a plant science research center.
In August of that year, the University of Illinois joined the academic partners, and the Monsanto Fund and Danforth Foundation joined as financial supporters. The center was named for the late Donald Danforth, a former chairman of Ralston-Purina and the father of former U.S. Sen. John C. Danforth, R-Mo., and Dr. William H. Danforth, former chancellor of Washington University.
John Danforth said at the time that the name was a fitting tribute to the man whose "mission was to feed the world."
The center was launched and the building constructed with a blend of non-profit, corporate, academic and government contributions:
* Monsanto Co. donated land worth $11.4 million.
* The Monsanto Fund, a nonprofit foundation, donated $50 million. Of that, $40 million was donated through the Missouri Development Finance Board, for which the foundation received $20 million in tax credits that it sold to 26 buyers for an average price of 95 cents on the dollar.
* The Danforth Foundation donated $60 million (including $5 million in annual operating funds through 2008). Of that, $10 million was donated through the center to the Missouri Development Finance Board, for which the Center received $5 million in tax credits. The center then sold those credits to two contributors for 95 cents on the dollar and used that money as well.
http://www.biotechknowledge.monsanto.com/biotech/knowcenter.nsf/ID/AE36EAE228392AB606256AF5004CD81D?OpenDocumentHe asked rhetorically,
"If we spy for military security, why shouldn't we spy for
economic security?"(4) Sen. John Danforth (R-Mo.) echoed
those sentiments, contending, "Economic intelligence is
going to be increasingly important to our country."(5)
The premise of Turner, Danforth, and others appears to
be that international economic competition inherently poses
a national security threat. Such an unwarranted assumption
betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of economics and will
distract U.S. intelligence agencies from their proper func-
tion: gathering information on genuine security threats. It
could also lead to an unhealthy and potentially corrupt
relationship between those agencies and American corpora-
tions. Finally, it has the potential to poison relations
with other democratic capitalist countries.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-185es.html