New York State Votes to Reduce Drug Sentences
HootieMcBoob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-04 10:16 PM
Original message |
New York State Votes to Reduce Drug Sentences |
|
This is a big deal. ALBANY, Dec. 7 - After years of false starts, state lawmakers voted Tuesday evening to reduce the steep mandatory prison sentences given to people convicted of drug crimes in New York State, sanctions considered among the most severe in the nation.
The push to soften the so-called Rockefeller drug laws came after a nearly decade-long campaign to ease the drug penalties instituted in the 1970's that put some low-level first-time drug offenders behind bars for sentences ranging from 15 years to life.
Under the changes passed yesterday, which Gov. George E. Pataki said he would sign, the sentence for those same offenders would be reduced to 8 to 20 years in prison. The law will allow more than 400 inmates serving lengthy prison terms on those top counts to apply to judges to get out of jail early.
The changes reflected a nationwide push in recent years to lessen some of the punishments for drug offenders, as states like Michigan and Pennsylvania have moved to emphasize drug treatment options or to give judges more discretion in sentencing those convicted of narcotics crimes. <snip> http://nytimes.com/2004/12/08/nyregion/08albany.html?hp&ex=1102482000&en=979ebd6c92d617e1&ei=5094&partner=homepage
|
thoughtanarchist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...but in the right direction...
smoke 'em if you got 'em!
:smoke:
|
VegasWolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-04 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. and if you ain't got em, borrow em. n/t |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Jiminy! It's about damn time |
|
There was some movement on this, Cripes!
|
Poppyseedman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Now lets see this move across the country |
|
It's about time drug laws in this country reflected a bit more common sense.
First time offenders should never be jailed. Everybody makes a mistake and needs to chance to do better. Nobody should spend a day in jail over weed unless your are a major dealer, than it should be for tax evasion.
Dealers of hard drugs that addict should be at least locked up for life.
Personally, I won't blink an eye if they all received the death penalty.
|
goodboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
5. A small move in the right direction. I wonder how much we could reduce |
|
our national debt if marijuana was regulated by the govt. like it is in Holland.
Furthermore, not prosecuting and imprisoning non-violent drug offenders will free up prison space for BushCo and the rest of the neo-fascists.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-04 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Trust me, it's all about the $$$ |
|
It's damned expensive to house all those petty drug offenders-
California's learning that the hard way with their ridiculous 3 strikes law that sends peple to prison for life for stupid things like swiping pizza's.
|
goodboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-04 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. the alcohol manufacturers will be decriminalization's staunchest |
|
opponents...second to the religious fundies, (which goes without saying of course) who only abuse booze and prescription drugs.
|
Moderator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-04 11:19 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Jan 20th 2025, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.