Hospitalized Reservist's AWOL Case to Proceed
Army Report Says Officer Who Sought Psychiatric Care Should Face Court-Martial
~snip~
Goodrum denies the charges and claims the case against him is rooted in retaliation. He has filed numerous complaints up the chain of command over the lack of equipment for troops in Iraq, about a commander whose leadership he questioned and about poor treatment of soldiers awaiting medical care at Fort Knox.
In the October hearing, a lieutenant testified that a captain who particularly disliked Goodrum had coerced two witnesses into writing statements saying they saw Goodrum fraternizing with his sergeant. (She, too, denies the charge, Goodrum's lawyers say.)
Also at the hearing, a lieutenant colonel at Fort Knox testified that he was angry about Goodrum's public statements criticizing the base's handling of sick soldiers. Lt. Col. Ronald Stevens, then the deputy chief of clinical services at Fort Knox, confirmed that Goodrum had been "turned away" from a clinic during his breakdown, but said it was because of a misunderstanding.
Goodrum's case has raised concern among some veterans who are also activists, as well as among some members of Congress.
When contacted by Goodrum earlier this year, Tennessee Republican Sens. Bill Frist and Lamar Alexander asked the Army to investigate and report back on his case. The senators specifically asked about allegations that Goodrum had been inappropriately locked down in the Walter Reed psychiatric ward. Goodrum's medical records suggest that he was locked down for administration or legal reasons rather than medical reasons, as is the norm. Army lawyers told the senators the Privacy Act prevented them from responding.
~snip~
more:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A53642-2004Dec9.html