Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Security Over Privacy? (ABC: Jennings interview with Ashcroft)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:12 PM
Original message
Security Over Privacy? (ABC: Jennings interview with Ashcroft)
Edited on Wed Sep-10-03 06:13 PM by underpants
7:10 this just aired so I think LBN rules are covered. It's short transcript so take the time. Very interesting.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=102

The following is an excerpt of the interview


JENNINGS: But doesn't the Bill of Rights, for a man like Padilla, apply really in two ways? First of all, it protects the individual. But doesn't it also give you a chance to make sure we have the right person? Without legal contests, or a legal challenge, or a legal opportunity, how do you do that?

ASHCROFT: There have been challenges in this respect during this situation, and the courts have upheld this president's authority, understanding that it's necessary in time of conflict and war for the president to be able to act in defense of the nation.

ABCNOTE: In fact, a federal judge has ordered the government to allow Padilla to see his lawyer. The government has appealed.
____
JENNINGS: One of the members of your staff said you're more concerned about the judgment of history than opportunists on either side of this great debate about the Patriot Act and civil liberties.

ASHCROFT: The truth of the matter is, I'm more concerned about the judgment of eternity. When I look in the mirror, I want to be able to think that, in the presence and in the sight of God, I will have done my utmost to serve this country with honesty and integrity. That's the most important thing.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's a friggin lunatic....
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Swell
So, Crisco Johnny's off the hook because it's up to God to determine if he's an out-of-control power freak?

Sorry, chum(p); you work for the American people, not God. But if you'd like to quit your position, I'll be more than happy to accept your resignation, you sanctimonious, hypocritical, fear-mongering, abuse-addicted stinkball!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. So Ashcroft doesn't consider himself accountable to the American people
The sick bastard is a loon among loons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. This psychopath has no business
as Attorney General. He is interpreting God's judgement, I suppose he talks to God and God tells him to save America from that nasty bill of rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's definitely a loon
Funny how this administration manages to be a magnet to attract every fricking loonie Repuke out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is a very dangerous man...
and freedom in the United States as we have known it for over 200 years is in grave peril because of this one, miserable, insane man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
concord Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. He seemed tightly wrapped
He didn't like the questions ... red-faced ... shifting eyes ... twitching jowls. I got a little freaked when he mentioned god. He's a fanatic. Unlike the loons in the WH, this guy really BELIEVES. That makes him dangerous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Yeah if you saw it the emphasis was on "...during a time of WAR!.."
Well hell W&Co. continually tell us the obvious, that this will be a long WAR! So I guess this is just how things are going to be. They want to perpetuate the war is an end to justify all of their means.

I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Far be it from me to speak for God, but......
....if Asscrotch continues his present course, the judgment of his eternity is going to be "slow roasted over an eternal barbecue" :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. The country is nuts to put up with this man
Ashcroft would be better off cleaning toilets, then he could be assured God would love him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathappened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. what gets me
is how in the world did he get thru congress on his appointment , why did'nt they throw his ass back to the place he came from ,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. This wacko is frightening
Is the transcript on the ABC website or what? I did not know about this interview and would like to read the whole thing, that is, if I can stomach it.

Also, I have a big problem and would like to ask a question and maybe even seek some advise about the California gubernatorial race, but I just registered and can't start a new thread yet. Which catagory would be the best to ask a question on an existing thread? I didn't see any on the Politics and Campaigns catagory. Thanks for your help.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Welcome to DU
:hi:

The link is provided below by grasswire(sorry):spank:

I think you only need 10 posts in order to start a thread so get to posting.

Where to put such a thread?

There is a "Politics and Campaigns" forum but I don't know how much activity the is there.

"General Discussion" (GD) is open to most anything but the problems there are that sometimes "flame wars" breakout and people scream and holler more than discuss also it moves REALLY fast and things get carried downstream.

You can always find a thread in "Late Breaking News" (LBN)about the Ca. race and pose it there.

Anyway good Luck and again Welcome to DU where you will find things wise and otherwise (visit the Lounge for the laughs, stay for the insanity).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Hi Scairp!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. He truly is out of control.
I wonder if he's even read the Constitution. He NEVER should have been confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well, what do you expect from the man?

This is not the brightest lamp in the house. After all, he lost an election to a dead man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. A Pharisee

At least that's what's they used to call the attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I wish I had seen this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. snips
JENNINGS: A personal question. My sense of you is that no matter what you say publicly, that John Ashcroft from Missouri is uncomfortable with being regarded as one of the most divisive public figures in America today.

ASHCROFT: I take no pleasure in anything that I would do ever to divide America. Now, I don't think it divides America to be a part of a debate. But I think great leadership unites people and doesn't divide people. And that's why I'm very pleased to be a part of providing what I consider to be facts and information about a fight that I think should unite us, and that's the fight against terror.

JENNINGS: Based on, on the criteria which you just mentioned, you are not regarded, therefor, as a great leader at the moment. Is that painful to you?

ASHCROFT: Well, I think, I'm delighted that 74 percent of the people in this country say that we're doing just about right, or we're not doing enough, and so they're encouraging us in our operation. Now I don't think takes 100 percent unanimity, I don't think we'll ever find that in America, it's too free a culture, and we want it to be that kind of a free culture. But, we want to help people understand very clearly what the facts are. You know, democracies are a little bit like computers. You put in the wrong facts, you'll get out the wrong answers. Garbage in, garbage out. We need for the people to be aware of what the facts are, what the circumstances are, what the character of this law is, and then let people debate it, and we'll be a part of that debate, and a part of that national discussion, which is something I have the pleasure of doing now. And but we think these facts are very friendly to the future of America by helping us thwart terrorism. And they're friendly to freedom by securing the liberty that that we have in a respectful way.

snip

JENNINGS: Do you think these portraits of you, uh, abusing power, seeking power, relentlessly exercising individual power, are caricatures?

ASHCROFT: Me?

JENNINGS: Yes.

ASHCROFT: Me?

JENNINGS: Precisely.

ASHCROFT: People are free to say and do about me anything they choose to.

JENNINGS: Of course they are, but do you think? Analyze them for us.

ASHCROFT: I think they miss the mark here. I am very concerned about freedoms. I always have been. My heritage has been one that has been focused on the liberties of individuals. And I will continue to have those concerns. And the reason I'm as ardent as I am about prosecuting the war on terror is that terror is the number one threat to our freedoms. And I believe that securing liberty through an aggressive fight against terror, within the limits of the Constitution, that's the best way for us to have and sustain freedom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Does Jennings realize the personal risk...
he is taking backing Arsloch into a corner like that? I doubt that John is past some J. Edgar Hooveresque maneuvers. The worst, Peter could get shipped to Gitmo; the best, he would get deported back to Canada.

Look out Mr. Jennings you're not dealing with a sane, rational man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JewelDigger Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Geez, I wish you would've said something positive!
We've all been complaining that the media hasn't been doing it's job well. Jennings did a GREAT JOB here. It would be nice to send him an e-mail saying thank you, rather than spreading fear like 'hope he watches his back' kind of nonsense. GEEEEEEEEEEEZ

Anyone know how to e-mail Peter Jennings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Ooooooops Thanks for the actual LINK
I did that at home and my computer at home sucks. I have no idea how I posted a link to and empty reply box.

:crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. "...in the presence and in the sight of God..."
Could we please get religion out of politics now? Please? What about in the sight of your fellow citizens, Johnny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavlovs DiOgie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. This man is beyond scary N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC