Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld discusses the challenge of rebuilding Iraq, pre-war intelligence, and the president's call for more international involvement.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec03/rumsfeld_09-10.html---
Jim Lehrer does a very tough, take-no-bullshit interview of Rummy in this must-read transcript. But for the full effect, listen to the audio. Rummy sounds whiny and desperate throughout, like he knows the act is falling apart around him.
HighlightsOn the Cakewalk ScenerioJIM LEHRER: Rightly or wrongly, Mr. Secretary, I went back and checked the record today, the impression that was given in public statements and all that sort of thing was that when this war ended, this war was going to end, that when Saddam Hussein and his regime, you know, fell, then the rest of it was going to be kind of a mop-up. And I'm just --
DONALD RUMSFELD: Not by me. . . . There were some people who were quite optimistic that there would be a surrender of their army in a formal way. . . . In fact, what happened was they didn't surrender. The intelligence was not perfect on that. They bled into the countryside. We had maybe ten, twelve thousand surrendered out of a much bigger universe.
On WMDJIM LEHRER: Let's cut to the crunch on this question. If in fact this team does not find any weapons of mass destruction, do you believe that would do serious harm to the credibility of the president and this administration and particularly on the... in the long run and when history looks back on this?
DONALD RUMSFELD: I mean, the intelligence that our country had-- has-- was over a sustained period of time, it was validated by other intelligence services. I have to believe it was reasonably correct -- obviously not perfect. No intelligence is ever perfect. And that as the reports come out, they will find evidence of the kinds of programs that Secretary Powell presented to the United Nations. That's my... yes, I mean that's what I believe.
JIM LEHRER: But if they don't? Is that a problem?
DONALD RUMSFELD: I don't do hypotheticals.
Why we don't need more troops in IraqJIM LEHRER: The troops question. Sending more U.S. troops --you've made it very clear on more than one occasion you do not believe more U.S. troops are needed. Do you still feel that way?
DONALD RUMSFELD: Here's the situation. We've got commanders on the ground and they say they don't want more U.S. troops. We've got General Sanchez who is in charge of the country who says he does not want more U.S. troops. More U.S. troops from his standpoint would mean more force protection, more combat support, and he says that he's got about on a daily basis fifteen, twelve, fifteen, eighteen incidents a day. They last two or three minutes.
JIM LEHRER: Incidents meaning --
DONALD RUMSFELD: Combat.