Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thousands of troops may not get voting materials in time (CA)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:18 PM
Original message
Thousands of troops may not get voting materials in time (CA)
Concern is mounting that thousands of overseas U.S. troops might not get voting materials in time to cast ballots in the California recall election.

Many are National Guard members who didn't think about filling out absentee ballot requests when they left home. They didn't expect to be gone long and had no idea an election would occur.

Adding to the confusion is the election's tight time frame and the delay in getting military mail to America. County election offices must receive ballots by 8 p.m. Oct. 7.

snip

"They're helping a foreign country develop democracy and yet they can't even participate in their own democracy," she said. "I find that ironic and insulting."

more

http://www.bayarea.com/mld/cctimes/news/special_packages/davis_recall/6744293.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is unacceptable, there should be a quick and easy way for them
to vote. All people in the armed forces should be cut some slack when it comes to voting. They are in the service to this country and do not have control over where they will be and when. Simple procedural nitpicking should never invalidate their votes. The arguements over postmarks on military ballots in the Florida election was disgusting and a slap in the face to our servicemen and women. It should not happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. There should be a way to get them ballots
To be completed within the legally designated time frame. The technology is available.

I doubt the government will be quite so anxious to help. One might guess that the military vote is no longer considered monolithically Republican. (If it ever actually was.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Use some of that $87 billion?
:shrugs:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Florida has a history of absentee vote fraud
There was every reason in the world to question all ballots in the Presidential election coming from this area. The vote fraud history in Florida, centering on absentee ballots is LEGENDARY.

People would be wise to try to seperate the truth from the blatant lies on this issue:

(snip) The charges in the mayoral race centered around allegations that addresses and names of Florida voters were falsified and altered by campaign staffers shared by Suarez and then city commissioner Humberto Hernandez. The case was originally reported by the Miami Herald, which won a Pulitzer Prize for its coverage. Hernandez -- along with thirteen other volunteers and city officials -- was found guilty of the charges and received a 364 day prison sentence for his crimes.

Both Hernandez and Suarez were members of Dade County's ultra-conservative Cuban-American Community, which vociferously charged racism and anti-Cuban bias amongst the prosecution. Roberto Pineiro, the judge in the Hernandez case, said at the time that the defendant attempted to "deflect the focus of the vote-fraud investigation by playing…the race card."

The charges and ensuing controversy resulted in the ousting of Suarez as the city's mayor and the beginning of years of legal wrangling and back-and-forth accusations, with Suarez to this day claiming he is still the rightful mayor of Miami. While Suarez was intensively investigated by the Dade County Prosecutor's Office, he was never charged or officially found guilty of any wrongdoing.

However, a civil case was later brought by eleven Dade County absentee voters and resulted in overturning the Suarez election. In that case, the jury found that Suarez and his staff did engage in vote fraud, specifically tampering with 5,000 absentee ballots. In an interview this morning, Suarez told FEED that he was "in no way involved in any wrongdoing," and boldly promised to run for the office yet again in the next election.

What is most stunning, though, is that Suarez now sits on the executive committee of the Miami-Dade Republican party and was specifically involved this year in helping get out the Republican vote. Suarez, who told FEED that he is working to become the committee's chairman, said that leading up to last night's election he "helped fill out absentee ballot forms and enlist Republican absentee voters in Miami-Dade County." If the 2000 or so disputed votes in the Palm Beach area are in fact returned from Buchanan to Gore, these same ballots may very well decide the presidential election in the coming hours.

"Dade County Republicans have a very specific expertise in getting out absentee ballots," he said. "I obviously have specific experience in this myself."
(snip/...)

http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:IdKa77kXu_cJ:www.commonplacebook.com/features/absentee.shtm+Florida+vote+fraud+absentee+ballots&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. We know who the voters in question are
So just deliver the ballots to them and help them get sent back. The request is kinda implicit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. The ACLU tried to delay this election over things like this
BUT OH NO the Repugs had to have it NOW.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Many ... didn't think about filling out absentee ballot requests"
Well, duh, there wasn't an election scheduled when they left.

This whole recall election is absurd; every aspect of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. I really don't care about the ACLU, the 87billion or the absurdity of the
recall. There is a much larger issue here. The people in the armed forces should have a way to vote for their local dogcatcher if that is the election on the ballot. This is not a recent problem, it has a history and deserves serious action and concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. The ReTHUGS KNOW they're toast on this one...
Because if they thought they had a ghost of a chance, you BET they'd make sure all those good, ReTHUGlican supporting (hey, GI, WHO is the one keeping you over there?) soldiers would have a chance to "participate" and vote for AHH-Nuld....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is bad and good
Bad - these people don't get to vote.

Good - their votes would overwhelmingly be for Arnold. As former military, I can guarantee you that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You think it is a good thing to just not let the opposition's votes count?
You are such a splendid progressive /sarcasm/

I guess we really have sunk to their level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I don't think it's a good thing but remember these arguments were
contained in the ACLU's case which was first filed before the primarily republican supreme court of California who decided that was not enough of an issue to hold off the election until March..if anyone disinfranchised these troops..it was not the Democratic party but their own...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I have gone out of my way to point out it is not a partisan issue for me
This is about people in the service of our country getting to vote, not about pointing fingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. It is a partisan issue though....the entire recall is a partisan issue and
therefore, the military votes are a partisan issue..the Supreme Court was so partisan in the denial to hear ANY argument for when the recall should occur that they disenfrachised the military vote in the meantime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hopefully the 9th Circuit takes this into consideration.
We must uphold all voters' rights. We'll see how determined people are to defend these rights. I heard a rightist say yesterday that "voting is a privelige, not a right" yesterday. That's fascist-type nonsense. That's why we have the Voting RIGHTS Act, to answer those like this man who would deny the RIGHT to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Now they know what disenfrachisement feels like
Too far away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. Someone voted for me
I registered in Virginia in 1984, then went into the Army 1985, I was stateside for about two years in Texas. Then I was stationed in Korea for about three years. Then I moved around awhile in Georgia and Florida. I moved to the Virginia area in 1991 to get a government job. The entire time I was in the military I didn't vote once. When I returned to the county election office in Virginia, I was told that I didn't need to register to vote because my I had voted in the last general election and two years had not elapsed since. That would be 1990. I hadn't been in the state over six years. For my registration to be current it meant that someone had voted for me in 1996, 1998 and 1990. I know I've told this story several times but it bears repeating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC