Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USA Today: Poll: Bush Approval Rating Takes Fall (52%)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:25 PM
Original message
USA Today: Poll: Bush Approval Rating Takes Fall (52%)
Edited on Thu Sep-11-03 04:26 PM by Beetwasher
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-09-11-poll-results_x.htm

WASHINGTON — President Bush's public standing, on a downward trend all summer, has slid to its lowest point since the September 11 attacks two years ago, a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll shows. (Related story:Poll results)

Due in large part to an economy that continues to lose jobs, despite positive indicators, and a situation in Iraq that is messier and more costly than Bush predicted, he is taking a big share of the blame.

A thin majority, 52%, approve of the overall job he is doing, down from this year's high of 71% in mid-April, when the war in Iraq still had a glow of victory.

--snip--

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall...yadda yadda yadda...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mind if I do a little happy-happy joy-joy dance?
He's toast. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Look at this particular snip:
Democratic pollster Mark Mellman says, "Bush ... has benefited from circumstances beyond his control. Now reality is setting in."

Bush's slippage suggests that if the election were held today, he would have a tough fight. Among registered voters, he holds a slim 47%-43% lead over an unnamed Democrat. That's down from a more comfortable 51%-39% lead he held two weeks ago




UN-NAMED DEMOCRAT 47-43%!!!!!!!

That is great!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. LMAO...

So we could field a Ghost and compete with the Chimp off the ole' block.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Not to be a downer, however...
We need to also realize that Bush does worse against a "generic Democrat" than he does against a named opponent. We need to work very hard if we are to maintain the strength of "opponent x" against the right-wing propaganda machine. Bush still has quite a ways to fall. We will surely help him in this regard...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. That's very true
It's very possible he does worse among likely voters than registered voters (see Zogby) but he does need to fall some more. However, 52 percent in a CNN/Gallup poll is huge because these polls run high. Next week, we'll probably start seeing other polls below 50 percent, joining Zogby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Results from approval polls by Gallup are usually higher
than those from other groups. So 52% from Gallup is very bad, indeed. This is actually consistent with the 45% approval result obtained by Zogby last week.

Be afraid... Be very afraid...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. And a majority says no to $87 billion
"Americans are nearly split on whether Congress should authorize the additional $87 billion Bush is requesting for Iraq and Afghanistan: 51% say no and 46% say yes."

Even USA Today can't spin this away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. NEARLY SPLIT?
Why can't they say "A clear majority of Americans is opposed?"

Fucking propagandists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. The right wing media always spins when numbers go against Bush
A majority are against it, but they say "nearly split".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Drip, drip, drip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. as I reported...
...on the thread in GD, CNN's political analyst said NO BOUNCE from the speech and that Americans support soldiers but don't support Bush game-playing the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. That was my suspicion
I didn't see your thread in GD but I felt absolutely sinking feeling sick when I listened to that speech and I KNEW it would do nothing more for him than slow down the downward dive in his support.

87 BILLION. That's a staggering number from a secretive administration that assured the sheeple "there's nothing to see here - just move along". Even the freepers know they've been screwed now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bad News From The Bush Whores
USA Today has been among the leaders of the Regime's apologists since well before the Alleged Election. They have spun every story and every friggin' piece of poll data (if the numbers indeed ain't been cooked outright) to prop up bu$h.

If USA TODAY shows him at (a probably-inflated) 52 per cent, the boy is in (as his Evil Daddy so eloquently put it) deep doo-doo.

EXCELLENT!

:evilgrin:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. This is an excellent observation.
I thought I was just imagining it since USA Today (as I remember it)used be the closest thing to that damned ubiquitous "Liberal Media". Now it is a straight up rag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Except for Zogby, they'll struggle: 51%...50.5%...50.25%...50.1%
The magic number will somehow magically keep Junior a "popular" wartime President for as long as conceivably deceivable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. 50.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%...
will be his approval rating in USA Today when he is escorted back to the Crawford pig farm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. It Can't Go Low Enough For Me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. i think i'm going to swoon!
is this awesome news or what! woohoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XEON Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. No Again!
Bush falls quick. Some politician. He is just no good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Looks like it's time for that September Product Rollout
People in California...heads up...I think you are next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedTX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Not California - they figure it's wrapped w/ Arnold
Seattle, Boston, Chicago or NY II - take your pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Frankly, I'm impressed
Honestly, would any Democratic president who lost 3 million jobs, wiped out a projected $5 trillion surplus and replaced it with record deficits, presided over the biggest security breach since Pearl Harbor, and badly mishandled an overseas war be this popular? I seriously doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Nothing "Impressive" about it
Why would you be impressed? Do you mean you're impressed w/ Bush? His remaining "popularity" has nothing to do with any ability or quality he possesses, it's purely the product of other people's and institutions work, not his. It's the product of shameless and despicable propoganda and obsequiousness. Quite frankly, it's not impressive, it's revolting and disturbing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I think dolstein was being facetious when he said "impressed"
He's surprised Bush isn't a helluva lot lower, which is where he should be based on his record. A Dem president who did all this would be scraping the bottom of the barrel on approval. But Bush has been propped up by the media who've treated his admin. with kid gloves. Even with that, people are finally waking up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. I believe that was the poster's point! n/t
Edited on Thu Sep-11-03 08:32 PM by are_we_united_yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. Clark's numbers
Interesting that he takes equally from Gephardt, Dean and Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
osaMABUSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Is USA Today a magazine or a newspaper? check out headlines
Every day I walk by a several newspaper boxes one containing USA Today the others: NY Times, Washington Post, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. The city papers usually have a similiar headlines pertaining to the big NEWS event of the previous day. But USA Today consistently has some feature headline like: "Airline Passengers Having Fewer Delays" or some such nonsense that isn't really news but something that belongs in a magazine. USA Today is to the Washington Post like Entertainment Tonight is to the CBS Evening News with Dan Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. What's shocking is that he's dropped 7 points in 2 weeks
That's a major slippage in such a short time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC