"We're mostly posing questions," he said. "King County is where we saw the votes changing. King County is the one county that was allowed to take ballots that were declared dead in November and bring them back to life in December."
See this thread I started in the Washington forum for more details:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph... On a percentage basis, King County was in the middle-third of accuracy in terms of the number of "discrepancies" between the second machine count and the manual recount.
13 counties had a higher percentage of "discrepancies" than King---
Asotin .174%
Franklin .158%
Pierce .144%
Kitsap .137%
Okanogan .118%
Adams .098%
Mason .092%
Skamania .081%
Walla Walla .079%
Yakima .076%
Jefferson .076%
Snohomish .070%
Grays Harbor .065%
King .063%
Of these counties, Eight favored Rossi (Asotin, Franklin, Kitsap, Okanogan, Mason, Skamania, Walla Walla, Yakima) and five favored Gregoire--None were neutral, in net votes.
Only five counties, statewide, were unchanged in count from the second machine to the manual (Ferry, Garfield, Kittitas, Klickitat, and Lincoln) and they represent just 1.25% of the state's votes.
NOT ONE SINGLE COUNTY'S TALLY remains unchanged from the first machine count--not even those relying on touchscreens.
NOT ONE!!
Recounts are good. They are more accurate. I wish we'd have been able to use them in Florida in 2000....
King County ends with one of the most clean counts in the state--.009%--only the five counties with zero changes, and Chelan county with .003%, outperformed King, without the extra votes added.
And Gregoire still won, by that reckoning, by ten votes.
The GOP is barking up the wrong tree by blaming King Co, and Chris Vance really has his head up his ass by claiming fraud. If King County committed fraud, they certainly would have done it in a more spectacular fashion than one vote out of every 11,769--that is what their discrepancies ratio works out to in this scenario (The security of the "new" votes has never been in question...).
Asotin County, mentioned above, "found" five new net votes for Rossi (actually ten, and five for Gregoire) in their manual recount--a ratio of one vote discrepancy out of every 576. Let's send the detectives over there!! (Kidding, of course).
If GOP ranters complain about King County making stuff up, fling the facts at 'em! They hate facts, and they usually pipe-down when confronted by them...
Of the first thirteen error-prone counties, Pierce went to Rossi in a big way, by 12,500 votes. In fact, Rossi won the vote total in the first thirteen counties by 57,791--with 1007 total discrepancies.
This is almost DOUBLE King County's discrepancy total of 553. And the average discrepancy rate for the first thirteen-- .108%, compared to King County at .063%. Yeah, Chris Vance, you frigin' loser, King County sure looks like the place to start hunting for votes! BTW, the first thirteen have a bigger voting population than King, 935,943 to 876,452.
But the GOP are building a case for the local echo chamber MSM to bleat back to the public---never mind the facts. Trouble is, the local press has not completely taken the bait--yet.
King County ran a good election under more intense scrutiny than any other county in the state. Now the GOP is fishing for a couple of hundred different votes to contest--so they can get their runoff.
It shorewoulda been nice if Al Gore had had the same opportunity four years ago....
What the Dems ought to do locally is hunt down a few of the same in the bigger (population) GOP counties--Pierce, Snohomish, Kitsap, and Yakima. Yakima will be the most promising, I should think, with their utter reliance on touchscreen voting. With enough countering evidence, the waters will be muddy enough that eventually the courts will rule that a certain level of discrepancies are to be expected, and no amount of runooffs and recounts can remedy the situation.
Cut it off where the law already does--call it a day after the manual recount.