Rehnquist's Health and Vote Contingencies
By Charles Lane
Monday, January 3, 2005; Page A11
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, undergoing treatment for thyroid cancer, has announced that he will not vote in the 12 cases the court heard during the first two weeks of November, unless the case would end up in a 4 to 4 tie without his participation.
But this raises a question: What happens if Rehnquist's fragile health deteriorates so much that he either dies or chooses to step down after he cast a vote at conference but before the court announced its ruling?
The court has no written rule to cover the contingency, according to legal analysts who specialize in the court's internal procedures.
But the likeliest answer, these analysts said, is that Rehnquist's vote at conference would not count.
This is because, until the court's decision is actually announced, votes on cases at conference are formally considered tentative. Indeed, every published opinion carries a notation indicating that a case was "decided on" the day the court announced it -- not the day the justices first voted on it at conference....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43003-2005Jan2.html