Both Raise Serious Concerns About His Nomination for Attorney General
Bipartisan Group of Prestigious Lawyers, Past ABA Presidents & Former Judges Demand Independent Commission in Lawyers' Letter
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 4, 2005
Julie Bernstein
(202) 822-6070 ext. 297
Cell: (240) 601-5562
Washington, DC-Alliance for Justice released today a detailed report and lawyers' letter critical of the nomination of White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales to be attorney general of the United States. Gonzales' record as White House counsel over the past four years, especially his role in formulating the policies that led to the torture of prisoners of war, raises fundamental questions about his fitness to serve as our nation's top law enforcement officer.
"Alberto Gonzales was the chief engineer behind the Bush administration's policy justifying the abusive treatment of prisoners of war," said Alliance for Justice President Nan Aron. "Gonzales wrote memos advocating the use of torture in defiance of the Geneva Conventions, international law and standards of human decency. He paved the way for the Bush administration to sidestep the rule of law that, as attorney general, he will be mandated to enforce."
Aron praised the unprecedented, bipartisan effort of over 300 prominent members of the legal community to demand Gonzales support an independent commission to investigate the detention and interrogation policies and practices of the United States. This group has long been insisting on the full disclosure of all memos related to torture-a request that Gonzales has failed to meet.
"It is essential that an independent, bipartisan commission with full subpoena power be established to prepare a full account of detention and interrogation practices carried out by the United States," said John J. Curtin, Jr., former president of the American Bar Association. "Gonzales should be closely questioned about his record in these matters so that the Senate and the nation may determine his fitness to serve as attorney general of the United States." <snip>
http://www.civilrights.org/issues/enforcement/details.cfm?id=27127