Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House: Armstrong Williams case was isolated incident

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 02:59 PM
Original message
White House: Armstrong Williams case was isolated incident
Scotty also says Williams should have kept his mouth shut about the arrangement...

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=400271

<snip>

"Questions have been raised about that arrangement, it ought to be looked into, and there are ways to look into matters of that nature," McClellan said. The spokesman did not say precisely who should look into it, and stopped short of backing an inquiry by the department's inspector-general, as some lawmakers have sought. He noted that department lawyers have taken up the matter.

McClellan said the news media "ought to be reporting in an objective, unbiased and fair manner."

<snip>

McClellan said he knew of no other contract in the administration like the one Williams had. He also hinted that Williams shared the blame.

"There are also questions about whether or not this commentator should have been disclosing the information publicly," McClellan said.

More…

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Translation, we now admit to paying the stenographers
to carry our line.

Thanks for the confirmation Scottie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. HAHAHAHAHA
Yup, and I'm straight. Thanks for that big faux pas, Armstrong, but, just who else is on the payroll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Getting caught was the isloated incident! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
57. LOL, exactly what popped into my head!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
58. here's where they were "caught" before
Education Department Tracked Whether Papers' Coverage Was Pro-Administration

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000663563

Published: October 11, 2004 11:30 AM EDT


WASHINGTON (AP) The Bush administration paid for rankings of newspaper coverage of the No Child Left Behind law, a centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda. Points are awarded for stories that say President Bush and the Republican Party are strong on education, among other factors.

The news ratings also rank individual reporters on how they cover the law, based on the points system set up by Ketchum, a public relations firm hired by the government.

The Eductation Deparment has also promoted its education law with a video that comes across as a news story but fails to make clear the reporter involved was paid with taxpayer money.

The government used a similar approach this year in promoting the new Medicare law and drew a rebuke from the investigative arm of Congress, which found the videos amounted to propaganda in violation of federal law.

The documents and video emerged through a Freedom of Information Act request by People for the American Way, a liberal group that contends the department is spending public money on a political agenda. The group sought details on a $700,000 contract Ketchum received in 2003 from the Education Department.

...more...

The criminal mal-administration has been doing this ever since they stole office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #58
67. Kick and raise you one
I remember millions dedicated to TV ads to convince seniors the medicare "reform" was gonna be great ... Those famous reglar folk ads... But perhaps the HMOs privately funded those through the billions they stand to make on the "reform" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #67
71. you mean these
http://webserve.govst.edu/users/ghrank/Political/Not-So-Great%20Expectations/medicare_ads.htm

WASHINGTON — Mock news reports produced and distributed to local television stations by the Bush administration to promote the Medicare prescription drug program violated a provision of federal law that prohibits the use of taxpayer funds for "covert propaganda," the General Accounting Office determined Wednesday.

The GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, noted that the administration had labeled its entire "video news release" package so that the 126 television stations receiving it would know that it came from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and its parent agency, the Department of Health and Human Services.

But that fact was not apparent to the 41 million senior and disabled Medicare beneficiaries who were the target audience of the "purported news story," which included the voices of off-camera production company employees identifying themselves as Washington reporters, the GAO said in a decision signed by General Counsel Anthony H. Gamboa.

"Nothing in the story packages permit the viewer to know that Karen Ryan and Alberto Garcia were paid with federal funds through a contractor to report the message in the story package," the agency said. "The entire story package was developed with appropriated funds but appears to be an independent news story."

<snip>

The GAO also found that the department had violated a second law, the Antideficiency Act, against using federal money for unauthorized purposes. Since "covert propaganda" is illegal, the GAO said, there were no funds authorized to produce it. The packages cost $43,000 to make.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darknyte7 Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Suuuuure it was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. STFU Scottie - you pig
McClellan said the news media "ought to be reporting in an objective, unbiased and fair manner."

and how does that work when you are freakin' buying the whores all over the place?

P.S. Scottie, your further statement that you "don't know" of any other bought and paid for whores only shows how freakin' much of a liar you are.

:argh:

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Did he really say this?
...the news media "ought to be reporting in an objective, unbiased and fair manner."


And his tongue didn't fly right out of his mouth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. McClellan Is Correct. The News Media SHOULD Be Reporting In An
objective, unbiased and fair manner...

Since they're overwhelmingly corporate whores giving the Neo Cons a free pass I absolutely agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coreystone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
63. No! You Have It All Wrong!!!....
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 05:22 PM by coreystone
Scott's nose is supposed to get longer. Don't you understand anything!!!

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lalajohns Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
61. lol
very funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
66. How much do you want to bet that Armstrong is going to be the new
David Brock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. I bet they are lying...
...but that really goes without saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cruadin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not according to this article at the Nation......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
45. I indeed enjoy reading David Corn. Thank you for the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Armstrong will "clarify" his remarks
he's now negotiating his fee for doing so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. ahhhh
so he wants to take others down with him in his fall? whatta guy. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. UH OH! Someone's off script - Armstrong says different...
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 03:06 PM by fob
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2931027


Edit: Damn it! I was having cut and paste problems so I ended up THIRD with the wittiest retort of the day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. You have to read into what Scotty really said...
McClellan said he knew of no other contract in the administration like the one Williams had.

In other words, there may be others and he just doesn't know about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #38
60. The ABC has determined "The White House" is McClellan?
Title of story at link;

White House: Williams Case Was Isolated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. God, you don't need to be a semiotics expert
to parse everything he said. He doesn't know about any other contract LIKE the one Williams has means there are dozens of contracts out there with slight variations.

There are also questions about whether or not this commentator...means that the commentator will be brought up on charges of disclosing state secrets, as everything the chimpministration does is secret.

And uh, when are our tax dollars going to be refunded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Refund with interest and jail time

is needed for Armweak Williams and the other crooks.

Surprise, surprise -- O'Liely, Novak ,Russet, Mitchell, Woodruff, Scareborough and on and on.


Let's get ready to rumble!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. Is there any self awareness at all?
There are also questions about whether or not this commentator should have been disclosing the information publicly," McClellan said.

Jeeessuuuuus...doesn't he see the irony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohtransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. "Armstrong's wrong.
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 03:10 PM by ohtransplant
No One else took the money...Really...It's the truth...I swear. You know me...What are you looking at? Do I have a booger?

Any way, he wasn't supposed to tell you. He 's a very bad man and we're gooood, very, very gooood...

Now why don't you run along and report what we tell you to."




On edit; sp

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. What about Novak and the Medicare propaganda campaign too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. What about all the HOs HOing WMDs and "terra, terra, terra" and SS
and the great economy and the "CLEAN Air act" and on and on and on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. whoever signed the check and whoever OKed it should lose their jobs.PERIOD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. And Scotty's way behind too. Check out this thread for Rummy's comment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Note the hidden message directed at other, as-yet unnamed, paid-off shills
Hidden message -- or veiled threat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Abu Ghraib was an isolated incident, too. . .
(except for all those other times and places we tortured people).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. "Paid Liar Swears They Do Not Pay People To Lie"
Honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. Bullshit. We need someone to investigate this guy hard and
see how far the money trail goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. sure it was
you fiLthy suck whores
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WMliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hah, so McClellan believes he should have continued lying about it then?
By isolated, he means Williams and several others. Only a few million of our dollars, right? :argh: :puke: :argh: :puke: :argh: :puke: :argh: :puke: :argh: :puke: :argh: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. bribes should be kept quiet
what an asshole

both of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE????
Get little Scotty's smarmy ass over here, I want to smack up that bitch.

And while we're at it, HEY BUSH you DICKHEAD!!! THAT MONEY ISN'T YOURS TO GIVE OUT AS PAYOLA TO JOURNALISTS TO FORWARD YOUR PROPAGANDA!!!!

If this isn't BLATANTLY wrong on so many levels, I don't know what is.

Fucking disgusting. The only way they must sleep at night is by not having a SHRED of a conscience or any sense of decency.

I will laugh my ass off the day I see these fuckers all get what's coming to them.

Karma's a BITCH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
44. "where is the outrage?"... you must be joking!
The administration lies Daily, about Everything! Hell we are in a WAR because of Lies! There is no outrage in this country over any of their crimes! None!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. THERE SHOULD BE!!!!!!!!!!
THERE SHOULD BE!!!!!!!

Take it to the highest rooftop, fuck the media, let's figure out a way to get the outrage OUT THERE.

So many people agree, but they look around and they see no reaction.

Reactions fuel reactions.

Let's start some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
73. currently the "outrage" is being expressed over 4 CBS employees
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. If the WH presstitutes had even a shred of
integrity the room would have exploded in laughter when McClellan let loose with the "objective, unbiased and fair" bullshit. As it is, they probably all line up with their hands out when the cameras are turned off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
31. The sad thing is that the full story of who is getting paid will never
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 03:35 PM by flordehinojos
see the light of day...unless the journalists themselves turn on each other, or on GWB.

You keep a dog belly's full of food and beer and he will never turn against you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
32. normal operating procedure, lie, cheat and steal just dont tell
anyone..... So, who would be on the hook for this one. The ex-Education czar or Karl Rove maybe.... I want some heads to roll in this POS admin.!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. BUSH IS A FARKEN LIAR
The Bush administration has promoted No Child Left Behind with a video that comes across as a news story but fails to make clear the reporter involved was paid with taxpayer money. It has also paid for rankings of newspaper coverage of the law, with points awarded for stories that say Bush and the Republican Party are strong on education. The Government Accountability Office, Congress' auditing arm, is investigating those spending decisions. (The GAO has since called the ads illegal)
http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/01/07/bush.journalist.ap/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. They only paid Williams off? Some sort of affirmative action thing the WH
is doing to encourage more pundits of color? :eyes:

Hey, did Williams claim the bribe $$ on his tax return? Is there a special line on the form for bribes and illegal payoffs? Any chance we could pressure the IRS into more audits for pundits?

Audits for Pundits
would make a great bumper sticker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
35. It seems like there's an element of this story that people are overlooking
If it's criminal, it's criminal -- let them prosecute the fuckers. But part of the success of the Bush administration, and Republicans in general, is that they distance themselves, to an extent from some of the right-wing pundits. Kind of like the Swift-Boat vets -- "that's a terrible thing they did to John Kerry, but we didn't pay them to do it (only our big donore did..yuk yuk)."

I think there is an angle to this that needs to be boosted -- what exactly is the relationship between right-wing pundits and the administration, and the Republican party? I mean -- we can use their "style-over-substance" attacks, right back at them. This is a way to pin the Bush administration with the "loony right," as being responsible for its message, and the success of the Republican party, due to daily trashing, ridiculing, appeals to emotion, lies, distortions and sensationalism.

Just pull some of the most hateful quotes from the right-wing pundits and say: "Is this the official opinion of the White House?"

The Republicans would have the balls to do it, if the situation were reversed.

It's a bad enough story, by itself -- but it can get a hell of a lot worse if we can publicize some of Rush's, Hannity's -- and especially Coulter's -- comments, et. al., and ask the question: "Is this the official opinion of the Bush administration?"

And if they say no -- how can we be sure?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
69. Kick-- interesting approach !!
Did they pay this guy? Did they pay that guy? Did they pay that poisonous gal?

Sure they deny it, but... We heard Scott say Armstrong should not have talked about his contract...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
36. And there are WMD in Iraq!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
39. "Williams is to blame" "He should have kept his mouth shut."
There ought to be an independent investigation and even a special prosecutor to look into this and determine what laws have been broken. Who else has been paid and have the spokes-whores in question been claiming their ill gotten gains on their income taxes?

It's clear to me that the Bush's would like to pin the whole thing on Williams and let it go at that. That seems to be what the media would like as well. This is just the tip of the iceberg and the Democrats should be all over this. Oh, and don't be surprised if a few of them aren't on the payroll too. The name Zell comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
40. As I sit here and pick a flying pig out of my tangled hair
I just had a huge power surge at my desk...

must have been that heavy duty shredder kicking on in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
41. Was what Armstrong did illegal? Or just unethical?
it is being treated as an ethics issue..but is it illegal? If it is, what is the discussion about? If it is illegal, why discuss "if" he should be indicted..and "if" whoever arranged for and paid for the service, should be indicted as well. i don't understand why this administration can commit crimes..and when caught, have a discussion about ethics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. more likely the Education Dept. violated the law
just a guess, this is similar to the Novak situation, in that the journalist (loosely in both cases) isn't the one committing the crime, but the goverment agents are the ones in the wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. In the wrong,criminally...or ethically!
If criminally in the wrong...why are they not indicted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. criminally
and if they're not indicted it's because we don't have a real Atty General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Where is the outrage??????????
We as a people..we have let this happen to us..and continue to watch it happen in front of us..like it is some bad movie and not our lives and our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. People for the American way is organizing action
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Thanks, Cocoa!!
apprediate that info!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildwww2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
59. Because this is not a Democratic administration. We can only indict
criminals if they are non GOP.
Peace
Wildman
Al Gore is My President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
42. likely more weapons of media deception
why are we surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
46. Lying is apparently a prerequisite to being in the Bush administration
OK, it's been obvious from the beginning to us here on DU how sleazy the neocons are. This is proof, and I certainly don't think Williams is the first journalist who takes bribes from them. Remember Karen Ryan, who posed as a journalist to promote the Medicare drug plan? She's the owner of a PR firm, hired by the administration to gain acceptance of the plan.

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Karen_Ryan

These people will lie, cheat, steal, and kill to stay in power. For those who voted for the little snot because they think he has superior values, and is oh, so moral, my advise is to wake up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjgman9 Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
49. Scotty, your'e full of shit
your'e damn right he should be disclosing information. I dont want my taxpayer dollars going to conservative propaganda at home. or a halliburton blank check
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
53. My hubby's hiney...
how transparent can you get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
55. Hahaha...What an ass.
Non-disclosure agreements don't apply to illegal practices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
56. Best way to find who else is on the payroll....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. NOW-scotty wants a media that is unbiased, etc. etc!!! what a bunch

of crapo!

....McClellan said the news media "ought to be reporting in an objective, unbiased and fair manner......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eek MD Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
64. How long till this is forgotten?
Yet another CRIME.....and i'd be willing to bet that nobody will be punished for it. In a week it'll probably be off the radar. Ahh, it must be nice to have total immunity....*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. CBS CBS CBS --- oooh --- EOM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
65. Good. They're on record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
70. NOTHING TO SEE HERE, MOVE ALONG
LYING BASTARDS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
72. And the torture in Iraq was just a few bad eggs....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC