Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Next Year's Senate Races Giving Both Parties Reason To Worry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CShine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 03:05 AM
Original message
WP: Next Year's Senate Races Giving Both Parties Reason To Worry
As Republicans and Democrats struggle to complete their lineup of candidates for next year's Senate elections, the two parties have a common set of problems: missed opportunities, bad luck and self-inflicted wounds that dim their hopes for significant gains.

In at least a half-dozen states, Republicans have failed to recruit their first choices -- and sometimes their second or third picks -- for races against potentially vulnerable Democratic incumbents. And, in Illinois, where a GOP-held seat is at stake, former governor Jim Edgar and others resisted White House pressure to run, bolstering Democratic chances for a gain.

In at least three states where Republicans once had high hopes, Democratic Sens. Harry M. Reid (Nev.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.) and Byron L. Dorgan (N.D.) appear to be on the road to reelection because potentially strong GOP challengers -- Rep. Jim Gibbons (Nev.), Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and former North Dakota governor Ed Schafer -- declined to run.

The Democrats have also had some recruiting disappointments. But their gravest problem is the retirement -- or possible retirement -- of incumbents in the increasingly Republican South, where the GOP swept open-seat races in 2002. So far, three Democratic incumbents -- Zell Miller (Ga.), Ernest F. Hollings (S.C.) and presidential contender John Edwards (N.C.) -- have decided against running for reelection. Two others, John Breaux (La.) and Bob Graham (Fla.), another presidential candidate, have not announced decisions.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10701-2003Sep14.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. More lies from the Post
I'm waiting for the day that the American version of the UK Guardian puts this lying sack o shit scandal sheet out of business!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What do you think they're lying about?
I'll take the Washington Post over most other's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually I found this
article to be more truthful than most of their ones in the past. Before they would have had a headline like "Democrats give up hope of retaking Senate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC