Not just rhetoric anymore!
Sunday, January 30, 2005
Not just rhetoric anymoreNine days ago, U.S. President George W. Bush delivered his second inaugural speech, a rousing, 21-minute address in which, among other things, he extolled liberty and proclaimed "ending tyranny in our world" the ultimate goal of U.S. policy. God himself backed this policy, Mr. Bush said. Wasn't it in full accord with history's "visible direction, set by liberty and the Author of Liberty," i.e., God -- that very special friend of America's? Every day since, the White House has been busy running damage control. What went askew?
That kind of rhetoric is certainly what foreign observers have come to expect from American politicians. They have been jarred by such language so often they barely twitch now when they hear it. Most were probably less surprised by Mr. Bush's second inaugural speech itself than they were to find large numbers of Americans suddenly wondering how it must have sounded, and what it might mean, to the rest of the world.
Because an odd thing happened. Americans didn't receive the speech with their accustomed languor. They replayed the tape, pored over the transcript, dissected the imagery, counted the number of times the words "freedom" or "liberty" were used (42) and for some reason -- the Iraq misadventure suggests itself -- decided to take the speech's well-worn, God-driven rhetoric seriously. A Los Angeles Times commentary Jan. 21 summarized the common reaction well: "We take this president at his word. And the words are startling."
A barrage of questions followed -- and has not ended yet -- about the speech's real-life implications for U.S. foreign policy. The White House has been asked so often whether it signaled some major policy shifts (what, for instance, did Mr. Bush mean when he said relations with "every ruler and every nation" would henceforward depend on how they treated their own people?) that it has been busy ever since issuing denials, corrections and clarifications. The day after the speech, reporters were summoned to the White House to be told that the speech did not signify a change in policy.
The day after that, the president's father, George H.W. Bush, intervened to say that his son's words did not mean "new aggression or newly asserted military forces." And in a news conference Wednesday, the president himself reiterated that, while the speech "set a bold new goal for the future," it still reflected "the policy of the past." Pakistan, China, Libya, Syria, Russia and other not-too-democratic allies needn't worry, in other words. The speech did not apply to them.
(snip)
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/geted.pl5?ed20050130a1.htm===
Cheap international phone calls from USA to Libya. Russia prepaid ...
Libya Business News - Media Monitoring Service by EIN News
... 07 GMT ... to actively tighten its relations with Iran, Libya, Russia and
China, insinuating the development of ... As Venezuela ...
TRADE GUIDE FOR LIBYA @ MuslimTrade Network!
... In July 1995, Libya and Russia signed a commercial and technical co-operation
agreement to assist Libya’s oil industries. Libya ...
Libya - Embassy: Embassies of Libya and Embassies in Libya
... Embassy of Libya in Russia Ulitsa Mosfilmovskaya 38 Moscow 107140, British Interests
Section in Libya Italian EmbassySharia Uahran 1 PO Box 4206 Tripoli, Libya ...
www.libyanet.com/embassy.htm - 15k - Cached - Similar pages
Russia Hopes To Supply Libya With Mig-31 Jets
Russia Hopes To Supply Libya With Mig-31 Jets. "MOSCOW, Jul 8, 1999 --
(Reuters) Russia hopes to supply Libya with a number of MiG ...
www.aeronautics.ru/nws001/reuters007.htm - 4k - Cached - Similar pages
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-37,GGLD:en&q=Libya+Russia