This was covered by
The Post Standard back on the twentieth.
Paras from their article that are relevant (IMHO):
A Van Buren man who wants to be a teacher was not accepted into the Le Moyne College education master's program, apparently because of a paper he wrote for one of his classes that advocated the use of corporal punishment and rejected multicultural learning in the classroom.
<snip>
That was until Saturday, when he received a letter from Le Moyne's Graduate Education Program, informing him he would not be allowed to register for any more courses and that his registration for spring had been withdrawn.
<snip>
"I have grave concerns regarding the mismatch between your personal beliefs regarding teaching and learning and the Le Moyne College program goals," leading to the decision not to admit him, Leogrande wrote.
<snip>
In the opening paragraph of his essay, McConnell wrote: "I do not feel that multicultural education has a philosophical place or standing in an American classroom, especially one that I will teach. I also feel that corporal punishment has a place in the classroom and should be implemented when needed." He got an A for the course.
<snip>
More at the article - it was hard keeping to the four paragraph rule.
So:
He wasn't expelled, he just wasn't admitted to the graduate program.
It just wasn't about spanking, but about his whole approach, including a rejection of multiculturalism.
Since the school officials are prohibited from discussing the episode McConnell can run with whatever story he wants without any rebuttal - recognise this tactic?