Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi and Reid Release State of the Union Response Excerpts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 04:36 PM
Original message
Pelosi and Reid Release State of the Union Response Excerpts
Mods: I got this by email, so there's no link. Also, it's not copyrighted.

Leaders Pelosi and Reid Release State of the Union Response Excerpts

Washington, D.C. - House and Senate Democratic Leaders Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid will deliver the response to the President's State of the Union Address. This afternoon, the leaders released the ollowing excerpts of their speeches:

REID ON SOCIAL SECURITY

"And that's why we so strongly disagree with the President's plan to privatize Social Security. Let me share with you why I believe the President's plan is so dangerous. There's a lot we can do to improve American's retirement security, but it's wrong to replace the guaranteed benefit that Americans have earned with a guaranteed benefit cut of forty percent or more. Make no mistake, that's exactly what President Bush is proposing."

"The Bush plan would take our already record high 4.3 trillion dollar national debt and put us another two trillion dollars in the red. That's an immoral burden to place on the backs of the next generation."

"But maybe most of all, the Bush plan isn't really Social Security reform. It's more like Social Security roulette. Democrats are all for giving Americans more of a say and more choices when it comes to their retirement savings. But that doesn't mean taking Social Security's guarantee and gambling with it. And that's coming from a Senator who represents Las Vegas."

REID ON BIPARTISANSHIP

"I want you to know that when we believe the President is on the right track, we won't let partisan interests get in the way of what's good for the country. We will be first in line to work with him. But when he gets off track, we will be there to hold him accountable."

PELOSI ON IRAQ

"Because of the courage of our servicemen and women and the determination of the Iraqi people, Iraq's election on Sunday was a significant step toward Iraqis taking their future into their own hands."

"Now we must consider our future in Iraq. We all know that the United States cannot stay in Iraq indefinitely and continue to be viewed as an occupying force. Neither should we slip out the back door, falsely declaring victory but leaving chaos... We have never heard a clear plan from this Administration for ending our presence in Iraq."

PELOSI ON HOMELAND SECURITY

"It's been three years since the attacks of September 11th. Our hopes and prayers will always be with the 9/11 families, who strengthen our resolve to win the war on terror. The pain and horror of that day will never be forgotten by any of us. Yet the gaps in our security exposed by those attacks remain."

"We can and we must keep the world's most gruesome weapons out of the world's most dangerous hands. Nothing is more important to our national security, and indeed to the safety of the world. For three years, the President has failed to put together a comprehensive plan to protect America from terrorism."

PELOSI ON VETERANS

"For those returning from military service today - our newest veterans - Democrats are calling for a G.I. Bill of Rights for the 21st Century, to guarantee access to education, health care and the opportunity for good jobs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great response on SS. When was the last time the Dems held the
repubs accountable for anything?

Iraq - when was the last time the Dems held the repubs accountable for anything?

Homeland Security - more of the same lies for war. But finally said something nasty about *.

Vererans - what good jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reid called for 40,000 more troops yesterday
i wonder if he'll include that statement in the SOTU response ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. As has Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. not hiding ....
nope ... don't think they're hiding that at all ...

i just don't like the policy ...

looks like the PNAC crowd is pushing hard for an increase in troop strength too ... strange bedfellows, eh ??

of course, 40,000 more troops probably are necessary if the plan is to keep sending them into countries we don't like even though we weren't attacked ... must be lots of those we haven't "visited" yet ... that's not what's being advocated here, i hope ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. the 40,000 troops are meant to replace
the National Guard and reserve troops, who were never meant to be used the way the Bush administration is using them.

Many of these people are first responders and are needed in their local communities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. appreciate that, PaulK
of course, an alternative approach would be to reduce the overseas use of the American military where they don't belong in the first place ...

it's hard to avoid thinking that more troops = more war ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. I can already hear the GOP response to this, if they acknowledge it at all
When she says:

"We can and we must keep the world's most gruesome weapons out of the world's most dangerous hands"...

...that pretty much opens up a wide window of opportunity for the Bush administration to "thank her for her concern" and pat themselves on the back for everything they've done in the "War On Terror"...

...to point once again to the non-existent WMDs, also known as "the world's most gruesome weapons," and how the SWIFT and DECISIVE actions of President Bush kept those weapons "out of the world's most dangerous hands," also known as Saddam Hussein...

I'd like to say that I feel encouraged and energized by this preview of Pelosi's comments. However, it sounds like more lukewarm water to me.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Osama Bin laden ought to be mentioned.
'It's wonderful that the first round of elections in Iraq has taken place with a measure of success, but how does this help bring Osam Bin Laden, the mastermind of 911, the man who claims responsibility for the death of 3000 Americans, any closer to justice?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You're right.
He should be mentioned every chance we get. His name isn't dropped nearly enough.

Homeland Security failure #1 Osama bin Laden.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Reid on "Bipartisanship."

Why does our Democratic Leadership always sound like it's apologizing for not going along with Bush in everything he wants. According to the LAT's the GOP want's to rule forever. They want to take our voters and cut off our funding. What kind of bipartisanship is that? They've declared war on US and it's no time to still be making overtures to them. Especially given the personal attacks Barbara Boxer and others have had to take from the Repug Attack Dogs on the Senate floor over the Ohio Vote and Rice's nomination. The time for Bipartisanship was long gone when the Election in 2000 was stolen. No more of this whiney stuff.

I wish them well on this counter to Bush, tonight. I won't be watching to see how it does, but it's good to see some clips.



REID ON BIPARTISANSHIP

"I want you to know that when we believe the President is on the right track, we won't let partisan interests get in the way of what's good for the country. We will be first in line to work with him. But when he gets off track, we will be there to hold him accountable."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. I liked Reid's response to SS and bipartisanship
His use of calling Bush's plan "roulette" is a very good metaphor.

Pelosi's responses were OK, but she needs some imagination and some creative metaphors to use. Reid has a decent grasp of metaphors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Related Pelosi letter received yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. A few thoughts on this
REID ON BIPARTISANSHIP

"I want you to know that when we believe the President is on the right track, we won't let partisan interests get in the way of what's good for the country. We will be first in line to work with him. But when he gets off track, we will be there to hold him accountable."

I will assume they plan on being VERY busy then.


REID ON SOCIAL SECURITY

"But maybe most of all, the Bush plan isn't really Social Security reform. It's more like Social Security roulette. Democrats are all for giving Americans more of a say and more choices when it comes to their retirement savings. But that doesn't mean taking Social Security's guarantee and gambling with it. And that's coming from a Senator who represents Las Vegas."

Good to hear. This issue seems to be one the party agrees on.


PELOSI ON HOMELAND SECURITY

"We can and we must keep the world's most gruesome weapons out of the world's most dangerous hands. Nothing is more important to our national security, and indeed to the safety of the world. For three years, the President has failed to put together a comprehensive plan to protect America from terrorism."

I'd really like a better definition of "the world's most dangerous hands." It's too broad of a statement. We need to redefine this Axis of Evil (and while we're at it rename it). There's room here for the Dem's to take this issue from the Republicans if it's worked correctly. Bush already failed to prove Iraq fit his profile (no WMD, bio or chem weapons). Use that as a starting point and expand.

Good work pointing out how he's done nothing to protect America from terrorism. Keep pounding that one in. Point out his failures (which are legion) and 2006 will be a good year.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's not a "plan to privatize" - it's a scheme to pirate.
Adopting the language of fraud is just more fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. I want to hear the words: "WHERE'S OSAMA?!?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. * didn't mention OBL once in his State of Delusion Speech...
War on Terror my ass...they don't care about getting Osama bin Laden...they care about their next conquest in the Middle East - and he mentioned them by name when he referenced Damascus and Tehran....

:hi: Swamp Rodent....longtime no see....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Oi Pachamama!
Busy with Mardi Gras, school, performing music (música Brasileira)... man, my linguistics class is HARD, but a lot of fun. I'm also teaching myself IPA (International Phonetic Alphabet) so I can better learn any language... including English.:D

Whatcha up to? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Been busy with the kids....
...and in a perpetual state of nauseau over what is going on in our country and the world....

We are also in the process of buying property in Canada....we really think things are that serious.... :cry:

Have missed being on DU and seeing you (ofcourse) and your always entertaining posts.... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. "guaranteed benefit cut of forty percent or more."
Beautifulicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. the brave Iraqis 'voted' to END the OCCUPATION when will we?
i wish they would mention the fact that social security is an INSURANCE, NOT an 'investment'

and they are too weak on Iraq - 14 permanent bases, TORTURE

also how can we consider ourselves to be winning when we are LOSING more rights at home?

and be BOLD we're are the ALTERNATIVES?

NATIONAL HEALTH CARE - TAX THE RICH - SUNSET PATRIOT ACT

that'll keep'em busy, and if they don't pass, we'll accept a little less... this time :evilgrin:

thanks for sharing :toast:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YESSSSSSSS!
Dangerous! Immoral! Gambling! Wrong! Failure! THOSE are the kinds of words I want to hear from the Dems from now on!

A towel and a cigarette, please...

:smoke:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC