Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Evidence of Smallpox Found in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 01:41 PM
Original message
No Evidence of Smallpox Found in Iraq
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=6&u=/ap/20030918/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_smallpox_1

Top American scientists assigned to the weapons hunt in Iraq found no evidence Saddam Hussein's regime was making or stockpiling smallpox, The Associated Press has learned from senior military officers involved in the search.

Smallpox fears were part of the case the Bush administration used to build support for invading Iraq — and they were raised again as recently as last weekend by Vice President Dick Cheney.

But a three-month search by "Team Pox" turned up only signs to the contrary: disabled equipment that had been rendered harmless by U.N. inspectors, Iraqi scientists deemed credible who gave no indication they had worked with smallpox and a laboratory thought to be back in use that was covered in cobwebs.

Fears that smallpox could be used as a weapon led the Bush administration to launch a vaccination campaign for some 500,000 U.S. military personnel after the Sept. 11 attacks, and to order enough vaccine to inoculate the entire U.S. population if necessary. President Bush also was vaccinated against the disease, which kills about a third of its victims.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lemme guess...
more "credible information from the INC....Chalabi should be in jail!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Vaccinations killed how many Americans?
Accessory to murder, I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. But we do know that Russia had many tons of smallpox weapons; ...
and they're not accounted for. I wouldn't destroy the stocks of vaccine just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a surprise!
Why, it almost seems like Saddam didn't have any WMDs, doesn't it? LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. And Cheney raised the accusations again,
as recently as last weekend? See Dick? See Dick Get Flushed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. When it Rains it Pours
Lies and incompetence; the gift that keeps on giving...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. So, the immenient threat they posed, and the reason we had to invade
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 02:55 PM by havocmom
was that they might throw sand at us?

OK, memo to the shrubster: We want you before Congress. You have some 'splainin to do!

edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. A light just went on in my head
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 03:06 PM by jamesinca
<SNIP>

Smallpox fears were part of the case the Bush administration used to build support for invading Iraq — and they were raised again as recently as last weekend by Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites).

<SNIP>

"From the onset the evidence was strictly circumstantial," said Jonathan Tucker, a former U.N. inspector and the author of a recent book on smallpox. "There was a lot of smoke but not much fire there."


<SNIP>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is my lightbulb of the day: "From the onset the evidence was strictly circumstancial"

But that was reason enough to go to war, circumstancial evidence. It was enough to scare the populace of the U.S. into believing that war was needed. It was reason enough to start a vaccination program of the military and first responders. It was a good enough reason to "believe" it was true. Lately there has been a lot of discussion about this administration claiming Iraq was involved in 9/11, and links to al-Queda. The WH has been saying that they never said 9/11 and Hussein. I think it is owed to the people entombed in the WTC and those whose blood has been spilled in Iraq to say that they mislead America on purpose with circumstantial evidence. Even if they never directly said it, they let us "believe". After all it was a good enough reason to go to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feminazi Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Team Pox sounds like a good name for this
entire administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. So it leaves one to ask
What intelligence was right/not spun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC