Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force instructor enters plea (relationship w/ student)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 02:17 AM
Original message
Air Force instructor enters plea (relationship w/ student)
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D88452N80.html


Sheppard Air Force Base instructor pleaded guilty Monday to charges accusing her of having an unprofessional personal and sexual relationship with a student last summer. Staff Sgt. Jennifer Jones received a reprimand, was ordered to forfeit $500 for two months and was reduced in rank to senior airman.

"I have to work very hard to overcome the mistake that I made," Jones said in a story in Tuesday's editions of the Wichita Falls Times Record News.

The relationship occurred while Jones was an instructor with the 383rd Training Squadron. Jones also was charged with breaking a no-contact order by seeing the man again.

Lt. Col. Donnie Bethel, Jones' chief defense counsel, asked the military judge to dismiss the charges based on selective prosecution. He pointed to the case of former Judge Advocate General Maj. Gen. Thomas Fiscus, a two-star general, who was dismissed in September at the outset of an internal investigation that concluded he had engaged in "unprofessional relationships" with female subordinates.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Charon Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Major General Fiscus
I believe MG Fiscus was required to retire as a Colonel. The "demotion" cost him about several hundered thousand dollars in retirment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not enough. That bastard
SHOULD have been court-martialed. At the VERY least, he should have been forced to retire as a Lt Col, not a full Col, costing him even MORE money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. $900,000 to be exact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Re: selective prosecution
Please bear in mind that my military experience was 25 years ago, but during training, instructors having relationships with trainees, while forbidden by regulations, was so common that no one even bothered to try and investigate. The general method used was "meet me at <supply name of off-base establishment> and we'll go from there" so that it was officially something that took place off base and out of uniform, so "how could they have known that the person they were having the relations with was a soldier/subordinate/trainee?"

I'd be very surprised if the same types of methods weren't still in use. Based on that, I would have to agree with her attorney that it was selective prosecution, unless SSgt. Jones was caught either in uniform, on base or in flagrant violation of the regulations (e.g. - passing an obviously unqualified trainee because of the relationship).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC