WASHINGTON — A nuclear threat is a nuclear threat. Except when it’s not, according to the White House.
Why does North Korea seem to get a pass and not Iraq, which was invaded because of weapons of mass destruction that could not be found? And what about Iran, which got two days of saber-rattling this week about its suspected nuclear ambitions?
One reason for the different standards: North Korea is in a real position to carry out its threats and trigger a new Korean War. Also, the United States already is stretched thin in Iraq and Afghanistan.
“North Korea is quite capable of responding to any kind of military action that we take with a devastating attack, an artillery and missile barrage on the South that would inflict millions of deaths and casualties,” said Michele A. Flournoy, who was a Pentagon strategist in the Clinton administration.
more....
http://www.qctimes.com/internal.php?story_id=1045299&t=Nation+%2F+World&c=26,1045299