Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Wants $86B More for Iraq, Afgan Costs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:25 AM
Original message
Bush Wants $86B More for Iraq, Afgan Costs

***************** I say NO MORE damn MONEY*******************

Bush Wants $86B More for Iraq, Afgan Costs



White House - AP

WASHINGTON - President Bush (news - web sites) was poised to officially ask Congress Monday for an estimated $82 billion in additional funds to cover the costs of continuing military operations in Iraq (news - web sites) and Afghanistan (news - web sites).



The White House was to send the supplemental budget request to Capitol Hill late Monday, White House press secretary Scott McClellan told reporters.

Last Monday, Bush submitted an overall $2.5 trillion budget for Fiscal 2006. That document called for restraining spending across a wide swath of government programs from popular farm subsidies to poor people's health programs. Spending on the military, the biggest part of discretionary spending, would rise by 4.8 percent in 2006 to $419.3 billion.

But this figure does not include the estimated $82 billion that the administration wants to pay for the ongoing military expenses in Iraq and the Middle East.
more...........................................

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&ncid=703&e=4&u=/ap/20050214/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_iraq_afghanistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
renaissanceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course we should give our troops
whatever they need. But we need accountability along with it. Is all this money going directly to the troops' needs? How about some sort of exit strategy to go along with it?

http://www.cafepress.com/liberalissues.16781662
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. "Accountability???"
"Accountability" is for Democrats, not the Party of God...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
46. The only money I want to see spent is
for the transport vehicles to bring out troops home. As for the rest of the money we have promised--remember all the money that at one time was marked for "reconstruction"--I say we give it to them as compensation for the mess we made. Give 'em food, material, money, whatever then need to get back on their feet, but get the military out of there. (what happened to "mission accomplished?"). If they need people to help, invite private contractors to go and help "rebuild" all they want to. If they want to risk life and limb for a quick fortune, let 'em.

quag·mire ('kwag-"mIr, 'kwäg-"mIr): noun. 1. soft miry land that shakes or yields under the foot, 2. a difficult, precarious, or entrapping position : PREDICAMENT

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renaissanceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 10:32 AM by renaissanceguy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. first find the other $9 Billion you lost .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. They should take a look in a couple of
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 11:38 AM by cal04
bank accounts
I bet we could find some others with cash deposits and not contractors.

The following is the statement of Franklin K. Willis, a senior official in L. Paul Bremer’s Coalition Provisional Authority government in Iraq and senior official at the State and Transportation departments in the 1980s under President Ronald Reagan. Willis will testify during Democrats’ Senate Policy Committee hearings today that Iraqi contractors were paid with bags of cash.
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/index.php?p=72
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. $9 BILLION apparently misappropriated by crony corporations!!!
There appears to be evidence of fraud, blackmail, death threats, obstruction of justice, misappropriation, conspiracy to cover-up, and on and on and on!!!

The level of criminal corruptin is simply stunning!!!

And the damned Bush administration and Republicans ARE LETTING THESE CRONIES RIP OFF THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER!!!

I am so disgusted by so much EVIL-DOINGS!!! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kris10ep Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #28
50. Bush spent your Social Security
on his war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. And on tax cuts for the Greed Piggies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush Sending $81 Billion Package to Congress
Reuters
Mon Feb 14, 2005 09:48 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush planned to send to the U.S. Congress on Monday an $81 billion package to fund U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, an administration official said.
The package includes $600 million to help Asian nations hit by the Dec. 26 tsunami.

The administration official said Bush will send the $81 billion request to Capitol Hill later in the day.

The request will push funding for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan to a record $105 billion for fiscal year 2005 alone.
http://olympics.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=7621532
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Play money not on the budget doesn't count
and we would like to thank the bank of China for financing the war that would pay for itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. They should send it right back!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. spend, spend, spend. and he promised us the OIL would pay for
Operation Iraqi Liberation.

plegh. <wipes mouth>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. All of the oil money must have gone to pay for the flowers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Plus 600 million for Tsunami relief
so if you vote "no" on this, you must hate helping tsunami victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. BUSH WANTS. BUSH WANTS. BUSH WANTS!!!! bush: a bottomless glass wanting
his never ending booze...whether the booze be money, oil, munitions, young american lives to kill young iraqi lives, bush wants. bush wants. bush wants. IT IS TIME FOR SOMEONE, ANYONE, TO SAY, NO. YOU CAN'T HAVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. How much does this make now?
And how much more is it than was initially projected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. I wrote to my senators regarding this obscene proposal
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 11:14 AM by CountAllVotes
and I sent the very same letter without any changes to several Republican senators as well. I suggest that others that might find the time for this urgent issue to do the same!

Below is a link to all of the senators' names, addresses, and phone numbers:

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Write or call your senators now (and other senators also) and let them know what you think about more funding for a war without end! Hurry! Time is of the essence!!!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. They could have an easy 9 billion if they could figure out where it went..
They've "lost" $9 billion in Iraq. Rumsfeld says the Dept of Defense can't account for about $1.5 trillion. I think if they can't account for it then we shouldn't be giving them money in a suplementary spending bill because there's no congressional oversight on the suplementary spending bills. And if they can't oversee their own spending then someone has to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamsta1 Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. What gets me is
the fact that * always leaves the costs of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan out of the budget, but we've been there for how long now? Does he still not know how much this is costing us? Has he divorced himself from reality??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. take it from the "Red State" welfare fund ....
Georgie ... here's the secret; THEY'LL STILL VOTE FOR YOUR GOP BUDDIES NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU PUNISH THEM!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. Fuck him - no more money.
You lost the war 'cause it cost too much. Go to hell Satan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
18. Suppla-Mental Illness
Put it in the budget, you fraud. You know damn well you're going to spend every penny of that and more, so what's with the flimsy argument that "you just can't tell" that Rummy keeps bleating? Admit the well-over-a-half-trillion deficit for this year and be a grown-up about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. junior wants more money and we can't even see the dead bodies
coming home.

Fuck you junior! Bring the troops home alive and end this goddamn bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purrfessor Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. Military budget increase is 27%, not 4.8% with this additional money
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porkrind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
21. Tax and Spend Republicans
This is obscene! He's a fiscal junkie, and he is spending us to ruin. Wake the f**k up, conservative idiots of America! He's driving us over a cliff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
53. No, Spend and Spend.
The repugs don't even have enough personal responsibilty to accept raising taxes to cover their out of control spending. They are like a bunch of 14 year olds with daddy's credit card. I, for one, have about had it with their teen angst...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
54. Borrow & Spend
Or Credit Card Republicans
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff in Cincinnati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. They've spent $300 billion in response to 9/11
I did some searching and found that the consensus is that the cost of the WTC attacks (we're talking insurance liability here) was about $40 billion. So we've spent eight times the amount of the actual damage done to us, and we're no closer to apprehending Osama bin Laden than we were on September 12, 2001. Who voted for this pinhead?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Actually, most of that money was wasted building a theocrisy is Iraq
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 01:37 PM by Mr_Spock
What a fuggin' loser this shrub character is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalCompassionate Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. Osama who???
You must mean Saddam bin laden.

Until the sheeple wake up, if ever, we will be at war somewhere in order to feed the great military industrial beast, even if we have to starve the social safety net programs social security/medicare/medicaid beast.

Which is exactly the intent of the neocon bastards. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff in Cincinnati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. Osama bin Forgotten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hahahahahahahahahah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. HR 418 will be attached to this....
The dems cannot vote on this bill!! In fact, they should walk out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. You mean the bill that allows the HS Sec. suspend ALL LAWS!!!
That's the "Real ID Act",...right?

They are attaching that thing to the budget?

EWWWW,...they ARE EVIL,....those Republicans ARE EVIL!!!

They LIE to the American people, and CHEAT the American people, and STEAL over TWO TRILLION via taxpayer funded DoD and at least NINE BILLION of taxpayer funded war in Iraq!!!

They are preying off our people!!! DAMN THOSE REPUBLICAN PREDATORS!!! DAMN THEM!!!

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. YES
That is why I have screaming bloody hell none stop over this. When I wrote the story the Gannon thing ate it up. People need to WALE Up!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
25. any ideas how
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 12:20 PM by bluedog
our Democratic Senators are going to respond to this?

Remember what the Republicans and the "Media" did to Kerry about the other $87 Billion..........lets get some ideas here to write to these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. I bet you wondered just how big $87 billion is ...
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 01:08 PM by GregW
This kinds puts it in perspective ...

http://www.crunchweb.net/87billion/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cadence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. Just thinking about the difference
all of that money would make in the lives of the children in America makes me sick. Instead they would rather throw money at killing. Sounds Pro-Life to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. Bush Wants $82B More for Iraq, Afghan Costs

By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - President Bush (news - web sites) on Monday urged Congress to approve quickly his request for $82 billion to cover the costs of military operations in Iraq (news - web sites) and Afghanistan (news - web sites) and a myriad of other internationally related expenses, such as training Iraqi security forces, aiding tsunami victims and helping military forces in other nations.


"The majority of this request will ensure that our troops continue to get what they need to protect themselves and complete their mission,'" Bush said in a statement released before the White House officially sent the supplemental budget request to Capitol Hill.


"It also provides for the continued pursuit of al-Qaida and other terrorist elements in Afghanistan and elsewhere," the president said. "I urge the Congress to move quickly so our troops and diplomats have the tools they need to succeed."


Included in the request is $74.9 billion for the Defense Department. About $5 billion is for reorganizing Army divisions and brigades and $5.7 billion for training and equipping Iraqi military and police, according to a federal official familiar with the request.


The remaining money in the supplemental request includes:

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&u=/ap/20050214/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_iraq_afghanistan&printer=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Damien Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. wow
somehow this doesn't appear in his budget...gee -- I wonder why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Yep, they're not like us
dirty "tax and spend lib'ruls."

They just spend...so Joe Millionaire gets his tax cut now, but I'll be working off his goddamn debt when I'm 60.

My future's so bright, I gotta wear shades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. On the Senate floor
some should ask how much of this money he intends to "lose".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. What exactly does the other $450 billion the DOD gets every year
pay for? And where is Missile Defense in all this? DOD or another off budget item?

These people can sure spend money. How come this accounting won't work for me and my checking account???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalCompassionate Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. the other 450 billion
goes to exploring other death delivering and/or profit options, either in the form of the never-will-work-but-$$$for-McDonnald-Douglas-GE missle defense or for special ops weapon buying from other countries to give to "insurgents and/or freedom fighters" .
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
38. Hands Off Our Money, @$$hole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
39. Strange that the gop doesn't question any of this.
It seems that identifying total blunders has become a partisan activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
41. 911 the tap into the American money river
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 07:58 PM by teryang
...which flows directly into the bush dynasty base, the defense contractors.

He couldn't do shit in the oil business but he hit a gusher here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
43. Dems should say, "The money's not there right now; tax the rich."
Tax the rich for it. Don't add more to the exponentially exploding national debt. Tax the rich. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 08:03 AM
Original message
I bet it pisses off the dictator no END that he has to ASK FOR IT
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
45. I bet it pisses off the dictator no END that he has to ASK FOR IT
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
47. I say we 86 the Bush Administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_to_war_economy Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
48. (pic)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
49. "Of course the people don't want war...."
The looting of the US Treasury and dismantling of social programs to keep us picking the bones. These folks in the White House are the most criminally insane and vicious bastards this country has ever had to endure.

"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -- Herman Goering, one of Hitler's top Nazis, at the Nuremberg trials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
52. In 2002, US military spending was 47% of the world's spending ...
This is when the US miliary budget was a mere $400 billion. It has been increased by more than 25% since then - such a short time ago.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsThePeopleStupid Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. thank you for your wonderful graphs
and I have read that (since then) U.S. military spending is more than *all other nations combined*. Amazing.

However, this is becoming another third rail. I never hear elected Dems saying a thing about it.

The Pentagon has not been able to pass an audit for years (see Chuck Spinney). I wish our representatives in congress would at least start demanding that the Pentagon account for all this money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
55. We just borrow more from China...
saw this opinion piece today:

Shooting Up With George
http://www.newsforreal.com/
Stephen Pizzo

Thanks to a new federal law credit rating agencies must provide consumers with a free credit report once a year. Might I suggest that President Bush avail himself of this freebie right now and see how the credit markets feel about America’s credit worthiness?

For those of you, who like Bush, slept through Econ 101, here’s how the lending business operates: the higher the risk lenders perceive in a borrower’s financial future, the higher the rate of interest they charge. It’s Rule One of economics – the higher the risk, the higher the rate of return, and visa versa. It’s what makes capitalism, capitalism.

If Bush pulled a free credit report for his US of A this morning here’s what he would discover:


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Interest rates on short-term Treasury bills rose in Monday's auction to the highest levels in more than three years. The Treasury Department auctioned $20 billion in three-month bills at a discount rate of 2.540 percent, up from 2.480 percent last week. Another $17 billion in six-month bills was auctioned at a discount rate of 2.760 percent, up from 2.710 percent…. the highest since they averaged 2.560 percent on Sept. 17, 2001. The six-month rate was the highest since 3.120 percent on Sept. 10, 2001.


Clearly those with the money to lend do not agree with Dick Cheney’s view that, “deficits don’t matter.” They may not matter to him or Bush since they will be long out of office when the loans they are taking out now to cover tax cuts, deficits and war come due. But the lenders – who these days is largely China – care a lot.

What they see when John Snow comes around, like he did this week, shaking his tin cup, is a nation living far beyond its means, and not about to change. So, they hike the interest they demand on the money we borrow to mitigate the risk of default.

Of course default is unlikely since the US can always print more money, spark inflation and devalue the dollar allowing us to screw our lenders by repaying old obligations with dirt-cheap dollars. But even former commies like the Chinese understand that and, by charging higher rates they mitigate against that as well.

Then there is the final reason rates go up for debt-junkie nations. It’s the same reason a heroin addict’s supplier starts the user out with free and then cheap fixes until he is good and hooked. After that the price charged is determined by degree of need – “So, just how much do you need a fix today, son?”

China and other nations that buy US bonds, (which you can accurately see as our communal credit card debt.) are only too aware of the Bush administration’s drunken-sailor-on-leave spending habits. They watched as he turned a projected $5 trillion budget surplus when they took office into a $4 trillion budget deficit. Most of that money went to buying votes from the rich with tax cuts and the elderly with drug benefits and two foreign wars. Eeeeeeeeeha!

So, it has come this. “Well, George, how much do you need a fix today,” asks our inscrutable Chinese lenders as they gauge the amount of sweat on his brow, the trembling hands, rambling references to God and democracy, incomprehensible mumbles about gays and marriage, and occasional outbursts about how he needs the money to help old people invest their retirement savings wisely.

And the interest rate on our national credit debt goes up.

Today’s news of higher rates on the bonds that fund the Bush deficits is just the beginning folks. This week Bush goes to Congress for another $82 billion to fund the war in Iraq. That’s $107 billion so far this year and it’s only Feb. Estimates are that little extravagance will cost us at least $400 billion.

Let’s be clear. He is not asking Congress for the $82 billion, because there is no $82 billion in the Treasury to give him. He is asking that Congress allow him to borrow another $82 billion for the war.
And, if Congress agrees, as it will, he will be sending poor old Treasury Secretary Snow back to China with his tin cup to borrow the money.

Am I crazy or is that crazy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC