Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP sen.: W may raise taxes to save Soc Sec

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:12 PM
Original message
GOP sen.: W may raise taxes to save Soc Sec
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/280784p-240475c.html

President Bush is so worried about Social Security, he'd back raising taxes and cutting benefits to ensure the program's solvency, a leading Republican said yesterday.

Nothing is off the bargaining table, promised Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa).

"The answer is yes," Grassley replied on NBC's "Meet the Press," on whether Bush would sign a reform bill that upped taxes and cut benefits if it included private investment accounts. "And not only that, but, listen, the alternative of doing nothing is also a benefit cut."

Bush knows that "personal accounts will not solve the problem," Grassley said, adding that "there are 100 moving parts" to Social Security reform.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. But not increase them for the upper echelon
because all that money they save trickles down to build new plants in Asia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. On what is left of the middle class, the poor don't have anything and
the neocons believe that god has blessed and entitled the rich,
so they are exempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here we go again.
Raising SS taxes on the middle classes while cutting income and inheritance taxes for the wealthy. Reagan redux.

Yeah freepers, you're dumbshits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is so much worse than Reagan....
If * raises taxes, will there be a shit storm of outrage?
Probably not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Well, Reagan cut the top income bracket in half
and doubled the SS tax, so it was pretty bad. Of course, pulling this ruse on the sheeple for a SECOND time IS fairly atonishing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. No! because Rove has convinced the dumb ass republicans that
the rich deserve their tax cuts like everyone else. and
they are too STUPID to realize the proportional effects
the tax is having. I have talked to so many bushbots
that say what is wrong with the wealthy getting huge tax cuts,
they are people too. Yea, people that look down their long snouts
at you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. that's what my husband the freeper tells me
the rich deserve it. we don't.

and will he vote for arnie who is fixing to cut my retirement even as we speak? yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodictators Donating Member (977 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. Rich CEOs are the ones who want to destroy Social Security
Why do you think corporations are putting up $200 million+ to privatize SS with "personal accounts?"

What the hell is the National Association of Manufacturers doing in the SS debate?

Of course, if they kill SS they can pocket the FICA tax, which is really paid by the employees.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. No
They're bullshitting Grassley. They'd rather pull their own arms out of their sockets than raise taxes.

The next four years depend entirely on the moderate Republicans-- whether they get tired of being gamed by the real criminals. Grassley is one to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. They'll raise the payroll tax in a NY minute.
The republicans don't give a rat's ass about people making under $90K a year. If they think they can get reelected (or close enough for vote theft) they'll do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. My suggestion - shift the tax 30K
Make the first 30K of SS taxable income SS tax free, then tax it from 30K to say 200K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. We don't have a Social Security problem.
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 02:43 PM by sadiesworld
We have a debt problem. Dems just need to stand pat on refusing to make the income tax cuts (for the wealthy) permanent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Agreed
What I don't understand why it's not patently obvious to the citizenry that Bush's tax cuts that were sold as "essential for stimulating the economy" (or similar spin) were a complete disaster for the US Budget.

So using Bush's own logic (We should get rid of Programs that don't work) - the tax cuts should be rescinded.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Hell yeah. And as for standing pat, I'll quote James Wolcott here:
Dems should resist the temptation to be statesmenlike and bail out Bush should he stumble, the way they shamefully rescued Reagan in his second term.

Bipartisanship has gotten Democrats nowhere for four years, has earned them nothing more than a fine spittle of contempt falling like a constant drizzle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
41. Dems went along with Reagan's payroll tax hike..
because it was supposed to be a long term fix for Social Security. Look where that got us.

Like Bush said, we won't get fooled again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. That would be just wrong for the neocons. If god liked the poor
he would have made them wealthy like fearless lost leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush is "so worried about Social Security" because it appears deep-sixing
it isn't going to be as easy as he thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikido15 Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. He didn't count on the alternative media...
making so much noise the MSM had to pick it up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. hah. i've been suspecting this all along... he wanted to raise taxes and
so he invented an excuse... he is breaking social security so he can "fix" it by raising taxes. and whose taxes will he raise? the poor and middle class. watch him do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just keep you eye on the prize ther George. Gotta end Social Security
and will make any compromise to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. raiding trust fund to pay for wealth tax cuts... raising taxes for workers
F--- you Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. PAY MORE GET LESS!
POS REPUKES! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. I hope he does raise taxes....
...that would mean his party will get creamed in '06. It would be the core issue that could allow us to regain the House (which, of course, puts us on the course to impeachment...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yinkaafrica Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. No, they will still win
Wait and see. There is no cause and effect.
Expect the pukes to be in power permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I disagree---this is what helped bring down Poppy...
...and it'll damage the pukes far worse than anything else could. Raising taxes is sacrilege in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Absotively. And we can afford to offer a progressive alternative that'll
get shot down by the reThugs.

I've been thinking--it's the cautious optimist in me--that W's already ruing the day that he opened his fat trap about privatizing SS relatively late in the campaign, and then going forward with it once re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #22
43. A bit pessimistic, aren't you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. right. another tax increase FOR THE POOR!!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. you could see this coming a mile away.... this was the plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yinkaafrica Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. yep
heaven help us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. "Read my lips!"
rotflmao!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. yeah just like what * said about Social Security during the election
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 04:13 PM by CountAllVotes
He said he wouldn't mess with Social Security there it and the 1st day of January, first item on the agenda.

You cannot believe a thing * says I am convinced.

If he raises taxes, he needs to not renew those tax cuts for the rich as well! They should also have to pay their fair share and the income level "cap" must be raised!

Of course considering we have a war without end, I think we rather screwed anyway no matter what any of these power hungry greed mongers do. :(

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LinuxInsurgent Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. now wouldn't that be sweet irony
"read my lips..no new taxes"...part deux..

hahahahahah...welcome to the world of rational economics, Bush. Government policies cost money...and taxes ARE a rational necessity...provided the tax dollars are not squandered on warfare and other stupidities.

If we didn't focus our money on warfare and preparing for war...we could have QUITE the social welfare system and money to balance our budget.

How is that countries in Europe do much better with less of a budget?

Only one explanation...we are wasteful and inefficient..and prioritize war and death over domestic concerns.

When we cross that barrier...the USA will be a much better place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. LOL - bush is "worried" about Social Security
what a load of horse shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. there's a bargaining table?
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 09:48 PM by cosmicdot
Grassley with daily talking points in hand ... surprised he gives his lips time off from being planted to relay them ... another corporate america darling (being polite) ... these liars need to be replaced ...

Grassley is, also, author of the 2001 Bankruptcy Bill which is being dusted off ... http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:SN00420:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3113390

and, the author of the Senate-passed Class Action S.5 bill
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN5:

The top industries supporting Chuck Grassley are:

1 Health Professionals $400,399
2 Insurance $384,919
3 Lawyers/Law Firms $302,640
4 Pharmaceuticals/Health Products $259,865
5 Lobbyists $256,190
6 Securities & Investment $248,350
7 Retired $215,545
8 Electric Utilities $189,299
9 Real Estate $140,200
10 Commercial Banks $134,450
11 Agricultural Services/Products $121,477
12 Health Services/HMOs $115,981
13 Business Services $104,132
14 Hospitals/Nursing Homes $100,248
15 Misc Finance $96,732
16 Misc Manufacturing & Distributing $96,125
17 Crop Production & Basic Processing $95,675
18 Retail Sales $90,750
19 Oil & Gas $90,300
20 TV/Movies/Music $84,072

Top Contributors
1 DCI Group $49,800 DCI Group is a full-service public and government affairs firm comprised of more than 150 veterans of federal and state politics and public policy. We offer a full suite of public affairs services, including:
Corporate Grassroots Campaigns
Federal and State Lobbying
Corporate Outsourcing

2 Amgen Inc $39,799
3 Wells Fargo $35,350
4 Verizon Communications $30,000
5 FPL Group $28,250
6 Prudential Financial $24,000
7 Edward D Jones & Co $22,500
8 Xcel Energy $21,500
9 Level 3 Communications $21,050
10 Wellpoint Health Networks $21,000
11 Professional Employer Organization $20,250
12 Piper Rudnick LLP $19,999
13 American International Group $19,750
13 Invacare Corp $19,750
15 Alliant Energy $17,600
16 Lincare Holdings $17,000
16 Mutual of Omaha $17,000
18 Deere & Co $16,500
19 Bear Stearns $16,000
19 Microsoft Corp $16,000

2003-2004 PAC Contributions: $2,251,133 (92% comes from Business)
Based on data released by the FEC on Wednesday, December 15, 2004.

Agribusiness
$255,276

Crop Production & Basic Processing
$48,500

Tobacco
$18,500

Altria Group
$6,000

RJ Reynolds Tobacco
$6,000

RJ Reynolds Tobacco
$3,500

US Smokeless Tobacco
$3,000



Dairy
$21,999

Poultry & Eggs
$8,000

Livestock
$9,500

Agricultural Services/Products
$88,777

Food Processing & Sales
$45,000

Forestry & Forest Products
$15,000

Communic/Electronics
$141,320

Printing & Publishing
$18,500

TV/Movies/Music
$43,000

Telephone Utilities
$18,000

Telecom Services & Equipment
$20,999

Electronics Mfg & Services
$8,000

Computers/Internet
$32,821

Construction
$99,400

General Contractors
$27,500

Home Builders
$19,400

Special Trade Contractors
$11,000

Construction Services
$15,000

Building Materials & Equipment
$26,500

Defense
$32,500

Defense Aerospace
$22,500

Defense Electronics
$3,000

Misc Defense
$7,000

Energy/Nat Resource
$172,949

Oil & Gas
$52,500

American Gas Assn
$1,000

Anadarko Petroleum
$1,000

BP America
$3,000

Burlington Resources
$1,000

ChevronTexaco
$1,000

ConocoPhillips
$1,000

El Paso Corp
$7,000

Exxon Mobil
$5,000

Frontier Oil
$1,000

Halliburton Co
$3,000

Independent Petroleum Assn of America
$1,000

Interstate Natural Gas Assn of America
$1,000

Kerr-McGee Corp
$2,000

Koch Industries
$3,500

Marathon Oil
$3,000

McDermott International
$1,000

National Assn of Truck Stop Operators
$3,000

National Propane Gas Assn
$2,000

Occidental Petroleum
$7,000

Petroleum Marketers Assn
$2,000

Shell Oil
$1,000

Society of Indep Gasoline Marketers
$1,000

Valero Energy
$1,000

Mining
$7,500

Misc Energy
$7,000

Electric Utilities
$99,949

Waste Management
$5,000

Fisheries & Wildlife
$1,000

Finance/Insur/RealEst
$370,183

Commercial Banks
$37,500

Savings & Loans
$7,000

Credit Unions
$6,500

Finance/Credit Companies
$18,500

Securities & Investment
$64,500

Insurance
$159,434

Real Estate
$29,000

Accountants
$34,999

Misc Finance
$12,750

Health
$459,451

Health Professionals
$254,645

Hospitals/Nursing Homes
$48,258

Health Services/HMOs
$67,982

Pharmaceuticals/Health Products
$88,566

Lawyers & Lobbyists
$96,003

Transportation
$135,329

Misc Business
$266,543

Labor
$57,500

Ideology/Single-Issue
$152,479

Other
$8,200

Unknown
$4,000



Personal Finances
http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2003/N00001758_2003.pdf

source: opensecrets.org
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.asp?CID=N00001758&cycle=2004



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
33. Raise taxes to pay Wall Street's commissions.
PLEASE PLEASE PRETTY PLEASE let him try it!! PLEASE!! PLEASE!!!

He really wants to fuck the Puke Party into oblivion! Not only does he want to destroy the THIRD RAIL, he wants to raise taxes to do it.

That would be sooooooooooo sweet. I hope he tries it. I really do.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
35. Raise our taxes, cut our benefits and give our money to the stock brokers
Hey is that another trifecta?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Taxes for the Wealthy making over $300 per yr.?
It is pointless according to the Silverspoon Sociopath.

"I'll give you one other thought. Let me just leave you with one other thought about taxing the rich. You know how that works. A lot of the rich are able to get accountants, so they don't -- they're able to dodge. You've seen it before. We're going to tax the rich, and then they figure out how not to get taxed. So guess who ends up paying? You do. And we're not going to let him do it to us. We're not going to let him wreck that economy by running up our taxes. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
37. The second prong of the attack against the American middle class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colorado Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
38. Things are getting beyond terrible to the point where they
are funny.

Thank heavens for DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
39. Nothing is off of the bargaining table except rationality
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 01:08 AM by depakid
and honesty.

Bush and the Republicans are just as determined to (at least) carve out a nice chunk of social security to give to Wall Street as they were to carve out a chunk of medicare and throw it to the pharmaceutical industry.

The media will continue to LIE about it- playing to people's (especially young, ignorant people's) greed, while whistling all the way to the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
40. It's a ploy...or atleast a way out for * to explain to the rich why he's
raising taxes on them.....

I don't trust any of these press announcements from these people...there is ALWAYS a hidden agenda.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. I'm thinking a "valued added tax" which hurts the poor & middle income
more on a percentage basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Your right - Far more likely * would tax the Poor & Middle Class...
How foolish and misguided for me to actually think he'd hurt his rich "base"....

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
42. He's issuing an ultimatum.
"Support my privatization scheme or else I'n going to raise your taxes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. drats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC