Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN live: Pittman convicted of murdering grandparents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:30 PM
Original message
CNN live: Pittman convicted of murdering grandparents
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 12:32 PM by Dookus
This was the kid who was 12 years old, on Zoloft, and murdered his grandparents.

He faces 30 years to life in prison. He is now 15.

I don't understand how he could be treated as an adult - it makes no sense to me. And by all accounts, prior to this acct, he had no behavioral problems. The jury didn't believe the Zoloft defense, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn it all...
I wanted him to be found innocent. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well that was unlikely
but there were other options that took into account his possible mental state.

But i still think it's insane to try him as an adult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. We will be facing the consequences of this
sooner or later as a society... we will

But the prison industry NEEDS these kids... it is called job security.

By the way, you still have a stomach for CNN?

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a shame
Our country has NO compassion! Anyone who knows or has experienced bi-polar disorder KNOWS that if you give an antidepressant to someone with this dx they have a really good chance of shooting up right past "normal" into mania.

And the explanation of, "reason of insanity" bugs the heck out of me also. If the person knows the difference from right or wrong even if it is only in the eyes of the law?" Geeze, who doesn't THAT include? The only ones I can think of are persons who's psychosis include believing the world will be happy that they killed "whomever".

You can't judge psychosis by what crazy beliefs it contains. And that thing about, "Well he could be really crazy because he covered up the crime". Bull! A person who believes he is Jesus often does not tell everyone because he KNOWS that most people will not believe him. So he has a cognizance that the world is not on his plane but he still truly believes in who he is.

I realize I am ranting and my words may be twisted and I don't feel like going over every single sentence with a fine toothed comb. That's because I just wake up in a real fog and have some sort of dyslexia going on. And just I am quite certain that, given a jury of my "peers" they would find that excuse inadequate!!!!!!!!!

At least I can use the spell checker.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The reality is that antidepressants sometimes release suppressed impulses
I have seen this in kids on antidepressants, who are normally shy and cautious, but then become unable to control impulsive behavior while on meds. It doesn't always happen, but certainly this is a line of defense for a 12 year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. bumpersticker justice
doesn't impress me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's just sick. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. well
i see our visitor has been given the granite tribute already. Good job, Mods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
egoprofit Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. don't mean to sound stupid but what is "eom"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. it means
"end of message", used at the end of a subject line that has text following it. Same for "n/t" which means "no text"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twaddler01 Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
77. wow
I learned something today :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #77
87. lol
well if you read my post literally, I misinformed you. I meant, of course, to write that it's used at the end of a subject line that has NO text following it. I is a dunce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. AP Link here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youspeakmylanguage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. There is an explanation...
...this is South Carolina.

A state which, by almost any definition, is a bastion of ignorance and lunacy. Unfortunately, I work there, although I take pride in living across the border in NC.

What I really don't understand is why special judicial distinctions for juveniles are even part of our laws if they are never enforced. If children that murder will always be tried as adults, why even offer the option?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yinkaafrica Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Booooo!
He will spend one year in juvenile and
then be placed in adult population.
With no counseling. Fuck this shit.
He was TWELVE YEARS OLD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yup, it's pretty sick.
Sending him into a life of violence, fear, violent sexual abuse, and living in total hell over something he did when he was 12 years old.

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. And his grandparents,
one of whom he shot straight in the face, are dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thank you for clarification
most of us where unaware of what "killing" or "murder' meant. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Just a reminder of what the little
bastard did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. We were already aware
in fact, that's why we're discussing it. If he hadn't killed them, this wouldn't be in the news.

Oh, I get it... you're one of those people who thinks there's no discussion to be had about juvenile crimes, sentencing, drug-induced psychoses, or anything other than "the victims are dead".

You're free to start a thread saying "the victims are dead" and see what kind of valuable discussion you get started. The rest of us will discuss some of the more subtle aspects of the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. What drug induced-psychoses?
The one the jury members who actually heard the case rejected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. We get it
you're happy "the little bastard" will be thrown into the garbage disposal that is our prison system.

I am not.

It's barbaric to treat a 12 year old as an adult, regardless of his mental problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I said I don't agree that
he should be locked up with adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
76. What's your opinion on what should be done then? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #76
81. Lock him up in Juvi,
get him the help he needs, get him an education, and re-evaluate on his 21st birthday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #81
117. THAT, unlike what the jury decided, sounds reasonable.
Therefore, we can bash this jury's judgment to hell and back. But hey, we both live in democracies. We can bash sliced bread if we want... can't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #117
119. Not without knowing the facts, we can't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #119
120. Who died and made you Speech Police? Good grief.
When I believe someone screwed up I'll say "XYZ screwed up." Sometimes only a very limited amount of information is needed to reach such conclusion. Feel free to disagree with my assessment all you want, but don't tell me I "can't" say something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. Good point
BTW don't tell me I can't tell you you can't... :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. Perhaps you should educate yourself instead of expecting to be
spoon fed information. Oh wait, I forgot you don't want any inconvenient information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Sorry!
Did not realize you wre on the jury. My mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. You sound just like a "Compassionate Conservative"
Or Hypocritical Egotist. Or a Pro-life Death Penalty lover.

May I suggest you examine your beliefs and your attitudes. Just give it a try. You might just find a snake hiding somewhere in the recesses of your mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. Amazing how you jump to conclusions.
The fact that I feel this boy SHOULD be punished for the cold-blooded murder of his Grandparents now makes me a "Pro-life Death Penalty lover" does it? Amazing. I wonder how you derive the one from the other, could you explain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. Easy - the hypocrisy of Pro-Lifers who believe in the Death Penalty
I consider them Pro-Birthers because they obviously believe that once a person is born, 12 people who agree can justify killing them.

In other words, they deserve to live only if they behave. That is not pro-life any way you want to twist it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. How did you get to
pro-life out of this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. I just have an inkling that you are a Pro-lifer because you
seem to have no compassion for this child. I see it all the time with <Many> Pro-lifers. Biggest hypocrites I've ever had the displeasure of meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. You have an inkling...
probably the same type you had to conclude this child was incompetent without hearing the evidence. I see now--conclusions without any facts. Good job!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
egoprofit Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. whos to say he wouldn't kill again...
if he was found innocent? would that slap on the wrist make him a stable productive member of society?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yinkaafrica Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. His greatest crime may have been bad luck
At any rate he needs therapy in an openly locked facility. Never said he should be set free, but twenty years in a cage with hardened
men is wrong. TWELVE years old.
(Anyway, his grand parents are in heaven now, right?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Agree with you there
I don't condone locking him up with adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #30
132. he will not be locked up with adults
He will be in a juvenile facility until he is 21--with other juveniles. I disagree that he should be in juve...those kids who are in juve are in for trespass and burglary and should not be housed with murderers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
egoprofit Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
52. i agree he should go to juvie instead.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
egoprofit Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
53. grandparents in heaven? who knows??? does it matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. there were options besides
simply guilty and not guilty.

He needs help, not 30 years in prison. Nobody is served by this sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
47. And if his grandparents molested him the jury would cringe because
he's just a kid but if he shoots his grandparents the jury finds that he is an adult. What fucking idiocy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #47
59. What an great comparison!
"And if his grandparents molested him the jury would cringe because
he's just a kid but if he shoots his grandparents the jury finds that he is an adult. What fucking idiocy."


You have just made one of the best comparisons I have heard in a long time. It is so true and so tragic.

:cry:




I wish we could send this thread to the prosecutor's office. They should be locked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
61. If the governor has a heart and a brain and courage, he'll commute this
before this boy gets to the adult population.

This is so fucking sad! :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youspeakmylanguage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #61
73. You obviously don't know the SC governor...
Gov. Mark Stanford, Republican, is a close personal friend of Rush Limbaugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. The death of Civilized Society
Examples are all around us, their way is an Abandonment Society, a barbaric society. There is no way a 12 year old kid should ever be tried as an adult, the fact that he was even on Zoloft is proof the kid had very serious problems.

http://www.lightupthedarkness.org/blog/default.asp?view=plink&id=371
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
130. I agree. This is heartbreaking and horrific. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Pittman shot his grandparents while they were asleep
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 01:31 PM by rocknation
then took money, guns, the family dog, and a truck before setting the house on fire and making up a story about a black assailant. That's far too much malice, premedidation, and consciousness of guilt to consider any kind of drug defense.

But the judge has the discretion to give him a sentence that in more in line with a juvenile's. Despite what he's done, I hope he gets a sentence that will give him the incentive to straighten up.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. None of what you listed
precludes mental illness, perhaps drug-induced psychosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. And you know he was mentally-ill, how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. the evidence presented at trial
suggest he was less than fully-healthy regarding his mental state.

But even if he was fully in control of his faculties, I don't believe 12 year olds should be treated as adults in the justice system. it's barbaric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Twleve people who heard the evidence
disagree with you. But I suppose you know more than they do about his mental state; after all, they were just the jurors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Perhaps
the problem is with the law, not the jurors.

But it's also quite common for jurors not to understand mental illness.

But nonetheless, the problem is the law that allows a 12 year old to be tried as an adult, and receive adult sentences.

It's barbaric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. So you understand
what you did not even hear, better than the twelve who heard it and came to a different conclusion. I see...

Barbaric? Perhaps; but shooting your grandfather in the mouth as he probably pleaded for his life is barbaric as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Look....
I'm glad you're able to take some joy in this. The majority of us think your view of this is callous and mean. C'est la morte.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. No joy at all on my part
I feel for the kid. Shoudn't have shot his grandparents though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. yes, you've said
but we're discussing something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #38
62. oh please..what do you expect from 12 people who are too stupid to get out
of jury duty.

The jury were idiots as was the prosecutor. There is plenty of MEDICAL evidence neurologically that the brain development of a 12 year old is nowhere near the brain development of an adult. That alone should be admissible to preclude this punishment but unfortunately a civil case requires more substantial scientific probablity than a criminal case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Glad to know you think
we have a system of "trail by the stupid."

many people GLADLY perform their civic duty and serve on juries when called. I guess I know where you stand when asked to serve.

BTW, this WAS a criminal case...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. I know it's a criminal case and have worked as a jury consultant
most people who CAN serve are not rocket scientists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. MOST people are not rocket scientists
Many bright people serve on juries. Are you saying that we have "trial by morons?" Are you advocating that we go to something like a three judge system instead of a jury of our peers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. No..it's the public's right to be stupid..the south has repeatedly proven
that ..I am simply saying that using "12 people thought otherwise" has jackshit to do with whether justice was accomplished in this case. Many people have been convicted by 12 people only to eventually be found factually innocent.
What the jury thought about what they saw has no bearing on whether the outcome was just.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. "it's the public's right to be stupid.
..the south has repeatedly proven."

Gee. You're not judge mental, prejudiced, or close-minded at all. Sure you're a progressive?

Goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #72
78. Same to you :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. LOL
:thumbsup: , NSMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
121. Don't ya know that they give Zoloft to everyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
45. Read my post #4 on psychosis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youspeakmylanguage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
57. That is a MO among white SC residents...
...if you committ a heinous crime, blame it on a black assailant.

Anyone remember Susan Smith?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SW FL Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. He Got 30 years for each offense
to be served concurrently. So sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. yes, it is
this serves nobody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Zoloft responsible, no question ---nt---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Seems 12 people
who HEARD the case disagreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yinkaafrica Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Courts are often wrong, the 'better' attorney often wins the day
Remember Ellis Unit One?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. And they are more often right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
54. Really? And what is your source for that amazing information
when it comes to juveniles? And really, what does it matter when the courts are sending a child to jail for 30 years.

We are the only "civilized" (I say that word very lightly) society that would treat a 12 year old like this.

We are the only ones who would murder in the name of justice also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. It's amazing
information that juries are more often right than wrong??? If you think that is not true than there is no further point debating with you, because next you'll ask for proof that water is wet.

BTW, Japan has a death penalty as does China and South Korea. Are you saying they are uncivilized, too? Is the presence or absence of the death penalty the only thing that makes a country civilized/uncivilized.

Before you ask, I am against the death penalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #60
116. US leads the pack in EXECUTING JUVENILLE OFFENDERS
Demand an End to Child Executions

Since 2000, only five countries are known to have executed juvenile offenders: China, Democratic Republic of Congo, Iran, Pakistan, and the USA. 13 of these 21 executions have been in the USA. On January 21, 2004, Amnesty International launched its Stop Child Executions campaigning action to end this "shameful practice" once and for all. Take action! »

http://www.amnestyusa.org/abolish/index.do


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #116
118. I'm against all executions
not just some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #118
124. As usual, your posts are full of BOGUS information--do some research
so you don't appear to be so pathetically uninformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #124
128. What was bogus?
Can you point to anything that was wrong? Or is it just stuff you "disagree" with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youspeakmylanguage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
50. You're turning into a skipping record...
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 02:50 PM by youspeakmylanguage
We know how you feel, guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
63. again.. 12 people who were too stupid to get out of jury duty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #63
75. I'm sorry, but that's a cop out.
Unless you are arguing for getting rid of the jury system altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #75
83. No I am simply saying basing the argument that justice was accomplished
since a jury said so is a slippery slope since there are plenty of examples throughtout the history of trial by juries to argue against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. So you'll never say that a jury's decision led to justice?
Even if you agree with the jury's decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #84
88. No you are putting words in my mouth. Best to only surmise what YOU would
say.
Sometimes I trust juries. I don't trust any jury that would convict a 12 year old child as an adult since that same jury would feel he were a child if he were molested. I believe the conviction defies logic.

Anything else you wish to assume about what I would think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. Is it safe to say you trust juries when you agree with them,
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 04:10 PM by DistantWind88
but not when you don't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. Again..were all those white juries that acquitted white men for the murder
of blacks in the 50's and 60's arbiters of justice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #91
93. Some of the white men MAY have
been innocent. Most assuredly, some of the guilty were allowed to go free,

Like I've asked you before, what do you want? To do away with the jury system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. No. I simply wouldn't use as the crux of my argument the fact that
12 people agreed. Sometimes 12 people are wrong. You are the one arguing that as though it means substantial justice occurred in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #94
96. And more often than not, they are RIGHT
Here's what it comes down to: unless you have the same evidence, facts, and knowledge that the jury does, you CAN'T yet say that they are wrong, can you? My point is the JURY is better able to judge this case than YOU are ATT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #96
97. And I disagree..you have no idea whether they slept through the whole
or didn't have cream in their coffee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #97
101. At least they were THERE
you were not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #101
110. So you are saying if they slept through the trial and did not pay
attention substantial justice was accomplished? I am beginning to feel the way about you that I feel about that jury...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. Do you have any evidence they slept through
the trial??? What's with your hypothetical? As far as I know they paid rapt attention. Do you have proof otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #112
113. Neither one of us do..that's why I wouldn't place any stock in their
decision. For all you know, they just wanted to hurry up and go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #113
115. So. Again.
You saying we should do away with the jury system?

I think we'd have heard if the jury slept through this trial, don't you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #115
126. How many times do I have to say NO! And no I don't believe
we'd have heard it. Any other triangulation? Or are we done for the day. I provided my issue and my reasoning...I got it...you don't agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #96
99. OK, that settles it then. OJ didn't kill anybody and I can't say otherwise
Glad we cleared THAT up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #99
108. You can say what you want
I believe OJ was guilty as well, BUT I did not hear all the evidence in the case...did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. So you're saying that
justice is not possible under the jury system???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. Nope. Read my other post.
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 04:14 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
BTW...are YOU saying that all those white men acquitted for lynching blacks in the 60's by all white juries were just decisions?

BTW.. I am assuming you think justice was accomplished in the OJ Simpson case as well, correct? After all, 12 people found him innocent..right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. No, I'm not
Sometimes juries are corrupt. Are you saying this one was?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #92
95. No I am saying they were stupid...didn't I already infer as much?
Yes..I believe that 12 people who would consider punishing a child as an adult are STUPID and reactionary..I am not just saying it..I am asserting it to be true...if that same jury had this same child in front of them and he had been molested, they would all quiver because he was just a child. Does the actions of a person or their biological and neural development determine whether they are an adult or a child?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #95
98. Amazing how
you can conclude twelve people you never met, using evidence you never heard, reached a conclusion you don't agree with (without you knowing all the facts)are therefore stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #98
100. I gave you the facts I used as a litmus test which is more than you offer
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 04:25 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
in defense of your position. Yes..12 people who would find a 12 year old to be an adult are FUCKING STOOOOOPID. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #100
109. They found him to be GUILTY
They didn't find him to be an adult. Pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #109
111. No...they found him to be guilty under the laws that TRIED him as an adult
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #111
114. They found him guilty of the crime of which he was accused
PERIOD. They had no determination as to his status as an "adult." That was requested by the prosecution nd allowed by the court. The jury has nothing to do with making those types of determinations. Are you sure you served as jury consultant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #114
127. They knew what the ramifications of finding him guilty
who are you to question my qualifications. Frankly you have posted so many conservative opinions on this board I have a few questions about you too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #127
129. It's conservative to
feel that even 12-year olds should be punished for murdering someone? Other than that, what "conservative" opinions have I posted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #95
123. Most mental midgets are hypocrites, look at Douche Limpballs, Oooo
all druggies should go to jail except me. Lets convict some more twelve year olds except if they work at Abu Ghraib and then they are just havin some fun. Oh that's right, adults were the ones doing it, never mind that they were ordered by * to do it.
(sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
79. And that is a good thing or a bad thing? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underthedome Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
49.  Why even have a trial then? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
67. Health Canada
has warnings of Zoloft increasing the risk of self-harm or harm to others, especially in the early weeks. There was no question that he had the signs of agitation it can cause and he had only been on it a few weeks.

Unfortunately the FDA only notes risk of self harm. Guess Canadians have different blood chemistry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Bloode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
58. Well.....
From where i stand, he deserves punishment, and a nice long one at that. I do feel 2 30yr consecutive sentences was a bit much. I see 10yrs as a good sentence. At least he would not be and old man upon release. 10yrs takes into consideration his age, and the drug factors.

The way it work in S.C. penal system, up to the age of turning 16 you are a juvenile. After that you go to prison. This is not adult prison. It is young adult prison for ages 16-19/20, after which you go on to adult prison 21 and up. So he is not going to be thrown in with the old wolves.

So yes i think he deserves to be punished, i do believe sentencing should have considered such mitigating factors and his age, mental state etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
71. First, it's immoral to convict a 12-year-old as an adult.
Second, what this kid's defense attorneys did was nothing short of malpractice. The kid's defense was simply incompetent from the word go, and now he's the one who must pay for it.

Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
80. I hate punishism. It is a sick, dangerous, infectious, evil ideology. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. Good Grief N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
85. Disgusting.
Not that this would happen of course, but the drug company and the shrink need to be held accountable, not this kid. The kid was only 12 when his mind was fried on Zoloft. Twelve! Zoloft a dangerous drug, given to him by his parents who thought they were doing the right thing, by doing as the shrink said to do!!

This is an outrage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
102. Teen Gets 30 Years in Zoloft Murder Case
Teen Gets 30 Years in Zoloft Murder Case

1 hour, 1 minute ago Top Stories - AP


By BRUCE SMITH, Associated Press Writer

CHARLESTON, S.C. - A 15-year-old boy who claimed the antidepressant Zoloft drove him to kill his grandparents was found guilty of murder Tuesday and sentenced to 30 years in prison.

Christopher Pittman hung his head as the verdict was read after about six hours of deliberations. He spoke briefly to the court before the sentence was handed down.

"I know it's in the hands of God. Whatever he decides is what it's going to be," Pittman said quietly.

The trial was the first case involving a youngster who says an antidepressant caused him to kill, Pittman's lawyer said. It came at a time of heightened scrutiny over the use of antidepressants among children.

<snip>

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=3&u=/ap/20050215/ap_on_re_us/zoloft_trial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #102
103. First, it's immoral to convict a 12-year-old as an adult.
Second, what this kid's defense attorneys did was nothing short of malpractice. The kid's defense was simply incompetent from the word go, and now he's the one who must pay for it.

Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #102
104. dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #102
105. unless the child/teen/young adul/ and finally adult receives lots of
psychiatric treatment during those 30 years in jail ... possibilities are that he may come out and repeat his offense... He would only be 42 years old and so .... unprepared to meet/face society ... it is tragic but blaming the medication for his crime is no defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #105
107. What you put in, is what you'll get out...
and in his young life there doesn't appear to have been much good going in. This boys life is a very sad commentary on how sick our society is. I hope he finds some peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #102
106. "12-year-old Pittman knew exactly what he was doing..."
How f*ck'n pathetic. 30 years in prison to a kid--now that's compassionate conservatism in action. It comes as no surprise that the US of A is the leading executioner of juvenille offenders. :puke: :puke: :puke:

From AI:

<clip>

...Virtually every industrialized nation in the world—even those that still practice the death penalty—treats children differently from adults. Children cannot vote or buy alcohol, for example, because they are correctly regarded as less fully developed and hence less responsible for their actions than adults. The same rationale for placing those limits on children, however, is utterly ignored when it comes to holding them responsible for crimes and sentencing them to death. The Court must correct this inconsistency and end this outdated, almost singular practice, once and for all."

http://www.amnestyusa.org/abolish/document.do?id=C020235668D5789385256F2E00518BF2



Demand an End to Child Executions
Since 2000, only five countries are known to have executed juvenile offenders: China, Democratic Republic of Congo, Iran, Pakistan, and the USA. 13 of these 21 executions have been in the USA. On January 21, 2004, Amnesty International launched its Stop Child Executions campaigning action to end this "shameful practice" once and for all. Take action! »

http://www.amnestyusa.org/abolish/index.do






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
125. From someone who watched and followed this case
I have to say that I thought he should have been found guilty by reason of insanity.

Translation - The Zoloft and his mind didn't work together and it brought out demons that were already there. It is a trajedy that he killed his grandparents, but there it little that can be done about that. He desperately needs help and to be taught how to control what he has on the inside.

Where this opinion comes out of (My *** / JK) In college I minored in Psychology and also have suffered from Seasonal affective disorder which was misdiagnosed as depression with a resultant perscription of Zoloft.

Drugs don't create what isn't already there. - No matter how much I've heard this argued, drugs don't create the monsters, they just let them out of their cages. - Zoloft is no exception, while it can be reasonably argued that these demons were brought out on these happy pills that crack heads use when they can't score crack, they did exist. After that consideration, the level of trauma that being a participant in that kind of event would leave more than enough trauma to justify multiple years of carefully directed therapy.

Now, Zoloft is a NASTY NASTY drug that should be removed from the market, not expanded into more of the marketplace. It causes wierd thought connections, at 19 years of age I had difficulty handling it. To compare it to the 'adult' drugs of alcohol, tobacco, marijuana and LSD I consider it to be on a level equal to someone stupid enough to drink alcohol while tripping on LSD. Zoloft impairs your judgement and alters her perception of the world around you, everything is happy, every thought is... good. You lose some of your judgement because everything is happy and good, no matter how bad it is and you know it. At that time any suggestion made to me seemed like a good idea.

Once I was off that nasty crap I went through severe mood swings, weight gain of 40 pounds and took about 6 months to adjust back to reality.

The worst part of the experience was that when I was perscribed the drug I specifically asked about side affects and was told by the psychiatrist that there were none. So far as I know, that is illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
131. They'll have to come up with something better than this if they want us to
ignore Gannon-Plame, IranSyria, Inc., and a newly Shiite Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC