Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russia, Iran To Discuss International And Regional Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:55 AM
Original message
Russia, Iran To Discuss International And Regional Security
http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&msg_id=5421851&startrow=1&date=2005-02-17&do_alert=0


MOSCOW, February 17 (RIA Novosti) - Secretary of the Russian Security Council Igor Ivanov and Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Iran Hasan Rowhani will discuss outstanding issues of international and regional security and a wide range of bilateral questions in the Kremlin today. The meeting will be held behind closed doors, repots the press service of the Russian Security Council.

Iranian diplomatic sources say that Mr. Rowhani will use the visit to discuss the Iranian nuclear programs, the promotion of relations in the peaceful uses of nuclear power, and new American threats to Iran with Igor Ivanov and other ranking officials of Russia. snip

One of the highlights of the talks will be the signing of documents on the terms of Russian nuclear fuel deliveries to Bushehr and subsequent utilization of fuel wastes, which are to be signed in Tehran in late February.

"The parties may also discuss the recent US threats to Iran and exchange opinions on this issue," said the source. Other possible issues on the agenda are the situation in Afghanistan and Iraq, Russia-Iran military-technical cooperation, and the status of the Caspian Sea.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. This next escalation is shaping up to be a big 'un, huh?
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Unlike Iraq, Iran has allies.
Unlike Iraq, bush won't be able to threaten & bribe any feeble little "coalition" against Iran.

The US sure is THREATENING a lot of nations, even INVADING and OCCUPYING nations that had NOT THREATENED anyone. It's so way beyond time the US learns what happens to nations that go around THREATENING others.

Let's not wait so long this time, ok world?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LinuxInsurgent Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Iran
went to tell his story to the local bodyguard-for-a-price...

Russia: "Don't you worry Iran...we got your back".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Okay
And Russia wants to arm Syria as well, correct? I just wonder what China plans to do as they were actually named in PNAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. China and Russia are engaged in mutual military maneuvers
They have agreed to a military partnership and are actively working their military into one cohesive unit. The US is not really the biggest dog on the block, just thinks it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Wow!
Thanks for telling me that. I'm trying to prepare for what appears to be happening. I wish our media did a better job of informing us. IMO, this sort of thing warrants more attention than Michael Jackson and Kobe Bryant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Russia Defies U.S. Pressure on International Arms Sales
http://www.mosnews.com/news/2005/02/10/armstrade.shtml

The head of Russia’s state arms exporting firm Rosoboronexport has said that Moscow will not restrict sales of other weapons to countries that are out of favor with the United States.

The Associated Press news agency quoted Sergei Chemezov, the head of Rosoboronexport, as saying that Moscow will only sign a deal with the United States to tighten control over portable anti-aircraft missiles.

Russian officials have said the deal will be signed by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov and U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during the Feb. 24 summit between presidents Vladimir Putin and George W. Bush in Bratislava, the Slovak capital.

Chemezov said that his company was strictly observing international law while selling weapons abroad, but warned that it wouldn’t obey U.S. recommendations.

“If the United States makes its own decisions, it has no effect on us: we proceed from international law,” he said at a news conference.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue to the bone Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. And the chimp looked into his eyes and saw his soul.....
.....yeah, right. Idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. This may not be "a good thing" but at least Russia's involvement
in security of Iran and arming Syria MAY just put the brakes on any near future Neo-Con invasion plans of either country.

We can hope, cant we? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Let us not forget the Russia/Iran Sunburn Missile purchase...
~snip~
The Sunburn missile has never seen use in combat but has been extensively field-tested by the Russians which probably explains why its fearsome capabilities are not more widely recognized. The Russians have been known to leak, via double agents, incorrect technical data to the US Defense Intelligence Agency. Other cruise missiles <>have<> been used, of course, on several occasions, and with devastating results. During the Falklands War, French-made Exocet missiles, fired from Argentine fighters, sunk the HMS Sheffield and another ship. And, in 1987, during the Iran-Iraq war, the USS Stark was nearly cut in half by a pair of Exocets while on patrol in the Persian Gulf. On that occasion US Aegis radar picked up the incoming Iraqi fighter (a French-made Mirage), and tracked its approach to within 50 miles. The radar also “saw” the Iraqi plane turn about and return to its base. But radar never detected the pilot launch his weapons. The sea-skimming Exocets came smoking in under radar and were only sighted by human eyes moments before they ripped into the Stark, crippling the ship and killing 37 US sailors.

Not only is the Sunburn much larger and faster, it has far greater range and a superior guidance system. Those who have witnessed its performance trials invariably come away stunned. According to one report, when the Iranian Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani visited Moscow in October 2001 he requested a test firing of the Sunburn, which the Russians were only too happy to arrange. So impressed was Ali Shamkhani that he placed an initial order for six of the missiles.

The Sunburn can deliver a 200-kiloton nuclear payload, or: a 750-pound conventional warhead, within a range of 100 miles, more than twice the range of the Exocet. The Sunburn combines a Mach 2.1 speed (two times the speed of sound) with a flight pattern that hugs the deck and includes “violent end maneuvers” to elude enemy defenses. The missile was specifically designed to defeat the US Aegis radar defense system. Should a US Navy Phalanx point defense somehow manage to detect an incoming Sunburn missile, the system has only seconds to calculate a fire solution –– not enough time to take out the intruding missile. The US Phalanx defense employs a six-barreled gun that fires 3,000 depleted-uranium rounds a minute, but the gun must have precise coordinates to destroy an intruder “just in time.”

The Sunburn’s combined supersonic speed and payload size produce tremendous kinetic energy on impact, with devastating consequences for ship and crew. A single one of these missiles can sink a large warship, yet costs considerably less than a fighter jet. Although the Navy has been phasing out the older Phalanx defense system, its replacement, known as the Rolling Action Missile (RAM) has never been tested against the weapon it seems destined to one day face in combat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. I bet *bush never saw THIS while gazing into Pootie-Poot's eyes
I'm sorry, but this is just too inevitable- a moran could have figured out it was coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Unfortunately, Bush doesn't quite measure up
to the status of a moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. So, Iraq now has an elected government
that's aligned with Iran. Iran and Syria are forging mutual security ties with each other, and Iran and Russia are working on bilateral cooperation.

That's some pretty impressive work that Bush has managed to accomplish in the Middle East, I must say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC