I could hardly believe my eyes when I read the following passage:
"The Syrian president is a member of the Alawite religious sect, feared throughout medieval Europe as the Assassins. When its leader wanted an opponent killed, he handed a follower a dagger and his wishes were carried out. Many Lebanese believe that Mr Hariri's death was commissioned in similar fashion by Syria's Mukhabarat intelligence service."
Hariri's killers 'recruited from Syrian-linked group in Iraq'
By Damien McElroy in Beirut
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/02/20/wleb20.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/02/20/ixworld.htmlAlawites have nothing to do with the Assassins, and as far as I know they even come from different branches of Shia Islam. How is it possible that a Western journalist based in Beirut is not able to get even the most basic facts about Islam right?
Of course, he tries to spin it that the Syrian government was behind the attack, although this was not what Mezher said:
"Although no firm ties with the Syrian regime have been established, his comments suggest strong circumstantial evidence of a connection."
However, later in the article McElroy is forced to acknowledge that the Syria based group has in fact links to al-Qaeda:
"Abu Adas, 23, a Palestinian Lebanese believed to have fled the country, attended two Beirut mosques known to be recruiting grounds for the Ansar al-Islam group, linked to the Jordanian extremist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Investigators suspect that the mosques have ties to Sheikh Abderrazak, a Damascus cleric who has helped fighters travel through Syria to Iraq. The Beirut attack bore similarities to suicide bombings carried out in Iraq by al-Zarqawi, who has increasingly strong ties to al-Qaeda."