Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At Home, a Hard Sell On Social Security (Wash. Post A 01)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 01:20 AM
Original message
At Home, a Hard Sell On Social Security (Wash. Post A 01)
Wisconsin Republican Touts Bush's Plan

By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 22, 2005; Page A01

STURTEVANT, Wis., Feb. 21 -- Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) spent his holiday discovering that President Bush's idea of adding personal accounts to Social Security can be as hard to sell back home as it is in Washington.

Ryan, who will help write the legislation as a member of the Ways and Means subcommittee on Social Security and is a longtime proponent of changing the popular government retirement program, is pushing the White House idea to farmers and factory workers throughout his district in the southeastern corner of the dairy state, with 35 "listening sessions" in 12 days.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) talks about Social Security in Sturtevant, Wis. Ryan is traveling his district to promote the White House idea of personal accounts.

Beginning his seven-stop day in the corn-growing town of Darien at breakfast time Monday, Ryan drew five people -- with an average age of 69 -- for a PowerPoint presentation in which he outlined what he called the "ugly options" of tax increases and benefit cuts if Social Security is not changed. He touted individual stock and bond accounts as a way younger workers can more than double their future benefits and put up a photograph of Albert Einstein along with his quote about the powerful force of compound interest.

But Jim Kieselburg, 66, a retired printing manager who now sells appliances part time, said he is worried about a market crash. "Worst-case scenario -- if everything goes flop?" Kieselburg asked.

a lot more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42455-2005Feb21.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Plus the invetment brokers take
and Bush's limit of profitability. Anything over 3% will revert to Wall Street. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Notice that the corporate media is using "personal accounts"
Edited on Tue Feb-22-05 01:59 AM by TahitiNut
The GOPhascists did a marketing study and found that "personal account" sells more than "private account" - a shift of 17%.

See http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=170x3782

(God, people can be stupid!) :eyes:

Right now, GoogleNews "private accounts" yields 8,820 results, while GoogleNews "personal accounts" yields 6,910 results. Watch this change in coming days!

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22personal+accounts%22&btnG=Search+News
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22private+accounts%22&btnG=Search+News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Right on cue, in the first paragraph.
I prefer "piratization" personally. :)

I tried googling "Saving Social Security", their all-encompassing lie line for this fiasco...

'Results 1 - 10 of about 2,580,000 for saving social security. (0.34 seconds)'

I'm surprised that phrase didn't make it into this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's how the GOP controls the language - with corporate media complicity
When language itself, which we'd suppose is media turf, is under GOPhascist partisan control then we're clearly under assault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. He's a 'gas pedal' guy, huh -- well, take your gas guzzling SUV
and your schemes to bilk as much money as you can out of the treasury and into the pockets of your fat cat friends and go drive over the nearest cliff.

Effing repukes think everybody's as stupid as they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. I am hopeful the American Public see thru * attempt to steal from us
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I hope so as well.....
This needs to crash and burn big time.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Whole lot of toutin' goin' on
I wonder if Ryan mentioned that guaranteed benefits will be cut even if Social Security is changed. The difference is that if Bush has his way, it will happen a lot sooner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. sometimes you can't lacquer up a pile of s**t enough to make the sale.
no matter how shiny, some things are just plain disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC