Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Australia 'stands with' Iran against UN nuclear plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:39 PM
Original message
Australia 'stands with' Iran against UN nuclear plan
A plan by the United Nations atomic watchdog, aimed partly at helping to persuade Iran to forsake its nuclear ambitions, is opposed not only by Tehran but a group of countries including Australia, Canada, Japan and Brazil, diplomats say.

They also say even the United States, which accuses Iran of trying to make an atomic bomb under the guise of a civilian nuclear program, has reservations about the proposed five-year moratorium on new nuclear production facilities.Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the Vienna-based UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), proposed the plan last year, hoping a global moratorium would give the world time to patch up loopholes in the nuclear non-proliferation regime.

UN diplomats say the scheme also offered Iran a way of saving face while acceding to a European Union demand that it scrap its uranium enrichment program. Countries like Australia and Canada, which have ample uranium but do not enrich it, have reservations about closing doors on their own future nuclear fuel options, diplomats said. "The idea is that it would be easier for Iran to give up enrichment as part of an international movement," a diplomat involved in EU discussions with Iran on its atomic fuel program told Reuters, on the condition of anonymity.

While the EU supports the moratorium, Iran has some powerful allies against it, including Japan, Argentina, Brazil and Pakistan, diplomats from several IAEA member countries said. "Some countries are worried that the moratorium would eventually become compulsory, especially countries that would be affected by it, they don't want to limit their options for the future," a diplomat close to the IAEA said.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200502/s1309124.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Smart thinking on their part for sure
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Bombing starts in June regardless
According to Scott Ridder. He said, the other day, his sources say, * "signed off on the plan" in Mid October 2004:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GHOSTDANCER Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Australia's Government has been drinking the Koolaid for awhile now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. this is why it's oppposed
"reservations about the proposed five-year moratorium on new nuclear production facilities"

nobody wants their nuclear abilities curtailed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Two reasons I cans imagine for Canada's reluctance:
1) Not wanting to be limited in our own nuclear future, other than the NPT. Probably a relatively harmless scenario.

2) The proposed U.N. initiative would make it more difficult for Bush to concoct a need to invade/attack. A bad scenario IMO, as it would imply we are secretly in cahoots with Bush's plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. If there was any country I would trust with the bomb it'd be Canada.
Edited on Tue Feb-22-05 11:26 PM by Skink
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Aren't the first three countries our allies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's the part that's so cool about this.
Hey Canada, Bring 'em on.

What do I care, I live almost 1000 Miles from Canada.

Hell, How many troops do you think it would take to defend the U.S./Canada Border?:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC