Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leaders to Bush Admin.: U.S. Must Reaffirm Historic Women's Human Rights A

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 12:35 AM
Original message
Leaders to Bush Admin.: U.S. Must Reaffirm Historic Women's Human Rights A
Another U.S. Withdrawal at the United Nations? Leaders to Bush Admin.: U.S. Must Reaffirm Historic Women's Human Rights Agreement

WASHINGTON, Feb. 25 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Leaders from human rights and women's development organizations are sounding the alarm about the possible U.S. withdrawal from a historic women's human rights agreement currently under review at the United Nations (news - web sites).

Governments are gathering in New York City over the next two weeks to revisit women's progress since the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women met in Beijing in 1995. The U.S. was a leading architect of the Beijing Platform for Action, where 189 countries committed to advancing universal education for girls, ending violence against women, and ensuring access to lifesaving reproductive health care, among other critical issues.

Late yesterday, in quiet negotiations out of the public eye, the Bush administration signaled to other nations that it would not unequivocally reaffirm the commitments made by the United States to the world's women a decade ago.

"I am extremely concerned that the U.S. will withdraw its support for women's human rights on the world's stage," said June Zeitlin, executive director of the Women's Environment and Development Organization. "This is in stark contrast to our government's rhetoric supporting women's rights in Afghanistan (news - web sites) and Iraq (news - web sites), and would be a terrible step backward."
more....
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=669&ncid=669&e=18&u=/usnw/20050225/pl_usnw/another_u_s__withdrawal_at_the_united_nations__leaders_to_bush_admin___u_s__must_reaffirm_historic_women_s_human_rights_agreeme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. There's some agreement or treaty or something - and this may be it -
where everyone has signed it except the US, Saudia Arabia, Iran and a few more countries that don't like women's right.

Anyone suprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. of course * doesn't want to reaffirm it
Empowering women is the exact opposite of what that little fucking facist desires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. So, now, how does withdrawing from this treaty affect Laura Bush's
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 12:56 AM by Gloria
PR campaign involving women in Afghanistan?? HUH??????????????????


Also heard over the BBC that the US won't be signing on to
a treaty dealing with MERCURY. Australia tagging along.

These people sicken me...cancel "me"...they sicken the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mutus_frutex Donating Member (469 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is anyone surprised?
Coming from a country that hasn't ratified the equal rights amendment in more than 80 years??

This is something that pisses me off enormously..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe THIS will get some more people angry enough to see this
idiot for what he really is...and vote against his minions in the '06 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kimber Scott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wal-Mart just HAS to have a contract for burkas. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. LOL!
It wouldn't surprise me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Does anyone else remember...
...the "divestment" movement prompted by apartheid in South Africa?

Why don't we start a "disinvestment" movement aimed at countries where women are treated worse than farm animals?

Get colleges, retirement funds, etc., to divest themselves of all stock in companies doing business in Saudi Arabia and other countries that brutalize women and deny them their human rights?

It took more than twenty years for the movement to gather sufficient momentum to really have an impact in the case of South Africa. So let's get started ASAP.

irritatedly,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. But, but.....W stands for Women.........
Not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. Republicans hate women's right and their groups, not suprised at all
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. The hallmark of the bush administration has been his hatred of women
I posted this a few days ago . . .

DELUSIONAL (1000+ posts) Sun Feb-20-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. The hallmark of the bush administration has been his hatred of women



He signed the gag order as one of his first order of business after being sworn in.

There is such an obvious bush hatred and fear of women -- which is probably one of the reasons he has taken up with the Fundies -- because they share his contempt for women.

Then Karl Rove was supposedly beaten up by a <gasp> girl and that's why he is so mean today. He, like a serial killer, is trying to kill and re-kill the object of his hatred.

Women who can be man-like are welcomed into the bush administration. These women are used a window dressing to cover up the contempt that the bushies have for women.

This gang knows that the abortion issue is meaningless -- because women WILL get abortions -- this has been going on for thousands and thousands of years. But this issue is being used against the women's movement -- and remember Ass-crotch tried to shut down the women's movement because they dared to boycott Missouri.

bush has a wife -- because she is window dressing and thankfully she gave birth to twins (unfortunately they were female twins).

I remember when I took Abnormal Psy -- years ago. My professor was one of the founders of Sports Psychology. He explained that homosexuality was not abnormal but simply part of the complexity of human beings. However, it was a topic he was supposed to cover under the title of "Abnormal Psy" -- but he taught it as normal non-pathological behavior. He said that a large percentage of professional sports players were homosexual -- but that most of these men were married -- they had arrangements and understandings with their wives. Flashy -- trophy wives were needed as part of their image. Not all Pro-Sports players with trophy wives are gay -- but some are -- he told us. He also said that this sort of arrangement was found in politics -- anywhere a man needed to be married to present a "wholesome" front to the public.

Someone in the bushie gang is Gannon's sugar daddy. And what I got from the Gannon website was a hatred of women. I very much doubt that Gannon would be dressing up in women's dresses like J. Edgar Hoover did. My guess is that these men hate women -- because they exist because of women.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1602600#1611775
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. I don't think thy really hate women...
It's just that they don't view us as anything more significant than breeding stock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Fundies hate women
They aren't any different than the Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. bushistas will announce
that the accord has something to do with funding abortion and the fundies will clap and cheer, and ignore that the accord advances the rights of women in general.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Might as well withdraw from it
If the country won't honor its provisions- and it isn't- then it's better to simply say so.

It does more harm, IMHO to render these agreements meaningless by virtue of a government's actions than sign on to something with no intention whatsoever of following through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. Republicans hate women
They are pro-repression, pro-rape, pro-forced childbearing, anti-equal pay for equal work, anti-education, and pro-female slavery. And not just for women in third world countries. For US here in this country, too.

Increased violence against women is inevitable under this regime.

Everything they do proves this. We need to start calling it what it is.

LOOK at their poster girl, the pathetic starved parody of a woman, Ann Coulter. Watch her desperately trying to earn the approval of the Republican men. The Republicans would have us all on our knees if they could.

We MUST speak this truth and keep on speaking it until women listen. 54% of voters in the presidential election of 2004 were women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. Dirty Bastards
XXX&&$%FR#@XXXSSEE#$$$%%%^^ is the best thing I can say about this. Burkas must be next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parsifal_e Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't see the logic in this .....
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 12:30 PM by parsifal_e
what will they lose by saying "yes"

Is there a financial obligation involved ?
cheap bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC