Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Telecom companies fighting competition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:06 PM
Original message
Telecom companies fighting competition
Telecom companies fighting competition
2/27/2005, 1:47 p.m. ET
By MARC LEVY
The Associated Press

KUTZTOWN, Pa. (AP) — Two years ago, this small college town thought it was blazing a trail for other Pennsylvania communities when it built a publicly owned fiber-optic network to deliver cut-rate Internet, telephone and cable TV service.

Then, in late 2004, Pennsylvania lawmakers bowed to the wishes of Verizon Communications Inc. and the state's other local phone providers, passing a bill that gives the companies the power to squelch any new forays into telecommunications by municipal governments.

The legislation, prompted by the companies' worries that other towns would follow Kutztown's example, marked the industry's latest victory in a series of similar clashes across the country.
(snip)

But telephone and cable TV companies have responded by flexing political and financial muscle at the state level, arguing that government has no business getting into their business.
(snip/...)

http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/business/index.ssf?/base/business-35/1109530115110680.xml&storylist=mibusiness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. With, boosh makes the world go woosh, in power, this should be
trivial to stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Welcome to the global-corporate-controlled local government. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. ohilly is ignoring this...
installing a city wide wifi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Democrats COULD Use This Case As A Posterchild. Will They?
at some point, corporations must be disciplined and their behavior regulated... just like teenagers.

And giving them limits is no more "Anti-Business" then giving curfews to your kids is Anti-Child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. PBS's "Now" had a good piece on this
cities that offered very cheap wireless broadband service to its citizens, coming up against the telecom lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. NOW on PBS covered this story this week
and the whole story was infuriating.

Municipalities can't start their own service even if they're not served at all by one of the big telecom giants. They're fighting any public effort tooth and nail, even when they have no intention of ever providing the service, themselves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is nothing new
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 02:32 PM by Gman
In the early 1990's, City Public Service, the electric company in San Antonio planned to put in fiber optics to each house and business to read the meters. The eventual plan was to provide telephone and cable TV service with the excess capacity. SBC (then, Southwestern Bell) lobbied City Council to win the city's prohibition against CPS doing this. The argument was the same. Government has no business competing in telecommunications and especially so in the city that SW Bell had recently moved its corporate offices to from St. Louis.. CWA's position was the city was taking union jobs away. This was the earliest occurence of this I know of.

As a side note, SW Bell mobilized the business community against the mayor and he lost his reelection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC