Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force Said to Waste $1M on Equipment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 05:55 PM
Original message
Air Force Said to Waste $1M on Equipment
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 05:57 PM by Rose Siding
SALT LAKE CITY -- A Defense Department report says the Air Force wasted $1 million on unreliable hand-held chemical agent detectors that could have put at risk any airmen who depended on the equipment, a newspaper reported Sunday.

Air Force officials may have violated federal laws and military rules when they bought 100 commercial versions of the detectors and supplied them to commanders in the Middle East while knowing that the manufacturer's tests showed the detectors did not work well in hot areas or under battle conditions, the Deseret Morning News reported.

Moreover, officials did not wait for other necessary tests, including some at Utah's Dugway Proving Ground, according to a Defense Department Inspector General report the newspaper obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.

The Pentagon has ordered the Air Force to stop using the 100 detectors that were purchased and to send them to military testers who are working to improve them.

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-air-force-waste,0,1274383.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines

here's the Deseret article
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,600115016,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only wasted $1M? That's a rounding error.
Either that or they're cutting down on waste. This should have more zeros.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rumsfeld, he's our boy...can't be trusted. So we had to pay his friend
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 06:07 PM by higher class
or someone's friend, but can't use them?

Here is an topic for investigation - were any soldiers killed or were there casualties from this 'toy'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chicken Feed. The Pentagon has misplaced One Trillion Dollars. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. and, this malappropriation benefitted British Aerospace?
at our risk?

assuming so, and assuming that the Buy American Act was either met under this procurement/contract award or else Republican DoD-Rumsfeld-Bu$h-Cheney used one of the loose waivers/loopholes which have somehow come about to circumvent the Act ... if so, was it done in order to give Poodle Blair some kick back as part of the White House-No. 10 Downing war-for-oil-and-profits wheeling-and-dealing ...

the Buy American Act was enacted in 1933 ... another New Deal law benefitting American workers the Republicans obviously hate ...

~snip~

"...BAE Systems can always rely on Tony Blair."

"Ever since Blair arrived in government in 1997 it has been apparent that he has supported BAE Systems against all comers and all rational argument. He pushed through controversial sales to Zimbabwe and Tanzania and lobbied, amongst others, the South Korean and South African Presidents on behalf of BAE Systems."

"Striking confirmation of the relationship was provided by Robin Cook in his book 'The Point of Departure'. He states 'In my time I came to learn that the Chairman of British Aerospace appeared to have the key to the garden door to Number 10. Certainly I never once knew Number 10 to come up with any decision that would be incommoding to British Aerospace'."

~snip~


http://www.caat.org.uk/information/publications/companies/baes.php

From a floor speech given by Senator Russ Feingold on the Buy American Act, on July 29, 2003. He talks about the purpose of the Act, and the waivers which he hopes to end.

~snip~

"Much of this can be blamed on flawed trade agreements that the United States has entered into in recent years. The trade policy of this country over the past several years has been appalling. The trade agreements into which we have entered have contributed to the loss of key employers, ravaging entire communities. But despite that clear evidence, we continue to see trade agreements being reached that will only aggravate this problem."

~snip~

"Some argue that the Buy American Act has outlived its usefulness in today's global economy. I argue that it is as relevant today as it was when it was enacted in 1933. The passage of 70 years has not diminished the importance of this Act for American manufacturing companies or for those who are employed in this crucial sector of our economy. In fact, a strong argument can be made that this Act is even more necessary today than it was 70 years ago. With American jobs heading overseas at an alarming rate, the Government should be doing all it can to make sure that U.S. taxpayer dollars are spent to support American jobs."

~snip~

"The legislation that I introduce today, the Buy American Improvement Act, would strengthen the existing Act by tightening existing waivers and would require that information be provided to Congress and to the American people about how often the provisions of this Act are waived by Federal departments and agencies."

http://feingold.senate.gov/speeches/03/07/2003820902.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree with Feingold.
I wish more people did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Only 1M...they should be commended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. When a welfare agency wastes $100,000 conservatives blow their cork
we could cut the military budget by 50% and still have the most powerful, well funded military in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. 1 million is like a drop in a bucket
What...no one remembers the 100 dollar hammers under Reagan's terms? How quickly people forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC