|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:21 AM Original message |
NYT: Hybrid-Car Tinkerers Scoff at No-Plug-In Rule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
short bus president (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. "neoconservatives who support greater fuel efficiency" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It's good for American power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChoralScholar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 02:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
46. but electricity is not all that friendly either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trogdor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 03:22 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. Still better than gasoline. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms_Mary (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 01:30 PM Response to Reply #51 |
85. But the consumer then has to pay additionally for that power whereas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostinacause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 08:23 PM Response to Reply #85 |
103. GAS?!?!?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms_Mary (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 11:03 AM Response to Reply #103 |
111. You've lost me. I think you mistook my meaning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrongbadTehAwesome (623 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 02:20 PM Response to Reply #111 |
120. lostinacause means that if you weren't paying for the electricity, you'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostinacause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 12:34 AM Response to Reply #111 |
129. What the post above me said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms_Mary (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 11:38 AM Response to Reply #129 |
134. That really doesn't have anything to do with what I was talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostinacause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. Hybrids have run off of their batteries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms_Mary (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 02:16 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. Right. I wasn't disputing how hybrids work, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostinacause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 07:22 PM Response to Reply #136 |
140. The Prius is a nice looking car. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms_Mary (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 08:48 AM Response to Reply #140 |
145. I'm planning on purchasing one in a couple of years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostinacause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-05 09:41 AM Response to Reply #145 |
149. I, like everyone else who work in my bussiness, need big trucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms_Mary (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-05 09:45 AM Response to Reply #149 |
150. I hear you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:51 AM Response to Reply #2 |
74. A lot of electricity is made from oil or coal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Neocons with nuclear interests very much support hydrogen economy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Forget hydrogen - just use nuclear for electricity and use batteries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. And where will we efficiently store the nuclear waste? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:54 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. We will efficiently re-use the waste, in other nuclear reactors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
megatherium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I'm all in favor of waste reprocessing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Massacure (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Breeder Reactors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Roosevelt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. Or use solar towers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. 25,000 acres each, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Roosevelt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:32 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. Just pointing them out as an option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
delete_bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #28 |
49. 25,000 acres is not a lot of space, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 02:19 PM Response to Reply #49 |
119. Those would absolutely suck here in the Midwest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 03:30 PM Response to Reply #28 |
93. dual use of land possible, nuke land problem greater |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 02:16 PM Response to Reply #93 |
117. That's why I said I'd prefer conventional wind turbines over this thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 04:34 PM Response to Reply #28 |
125. It looks like you could put a PILE of these things on 25,000 acres |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LdyGuique (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 01:23 PM Response to Reply #19 |
83. I hadn't read about this before -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doubleplusgood (810 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
25. 1958 Ford Nucleon, nuclear-powered concept car |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. this is making a comeback google halfnium reactor car |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:54 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Batteries are toxic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 08:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
67. Eentually we'll run into problems with nuclear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 02:21 PM Response to Reply #67 |
121. That's using only uranium, and not reprocessing it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
currents (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 11:03 AM Response to Reply #5 |
133. Hell No, Batteries are crap H2 is the way to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Yes, hydrogen cars are the answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZR2 (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 04:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
96. hydrogen power is NOT the answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:48 PM Response to Reply #96 |
104. I know hydrogen power is not the answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfkrfk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 08:38 AM Response to Reply #8 |
110. electricity is needed to make hydrogen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
420inTN (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:53 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. probably meant "neoconservationists"? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
megatherium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. The neocons call themselves "geo-greens". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 08:33 PM Response to Reply #14 |
66. It's their Plan B, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selteri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. I think they typed the wrong word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
26. they have started to write about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trogdor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 03:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
50. All three of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kimber Scott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 10:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
70. Exactly what I thought. Doesn't Neocon = Oilman = 4 years of rising gas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #1 |
76. Plug-ins may actually reduce total energy efficiency: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
124. Let's Really Sum it Up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gristy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
3. I wonder what percent of Americans don't know where we get the hydrogen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. If we get it from coal, we're being idiotic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hershman (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:50 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. you could use hydropower as long as the rivers don't dry up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
megatherium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. There isn't enough hydro capacity for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 04:18 PM Response to Reply #13 |
55. ocean hydro |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
megatherium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 01:09 PM Response to Reply #55 |
80. Have they built these yet? The page you link to was written in 2002. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 07:42 PM Response to Reply #80 |
101. you tell me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
megatherium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 07:53 AM Response to Reply #101 |
109. my question was prompted by the article, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 12:19 PM Response to Reply #109 |
114. companies holding back to get last possible profit from oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtTheEndOfTheDay (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Yes, or you could simply generate electricity and skip the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. French came up with an even simpler alternative--compressed air car |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Probably better than hydrogen power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #35 |
54. You're kidding--why nuke? We could replace with wind and solar and.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 07:26 PM Response to Reply #54 |
64. I can't believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 08:23 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Michael Parenti wrote about something similar with flour mills |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 12:08 PM Response to Reply #65 |
78. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
megatherium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 01:13 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. The catch with deregulation is that if energy supplies get kind of tight, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 02:36 PM Response to Reply #81 |
90. I might be wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
megatherium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #54 |
79. 100 square miles of PV panels would only provide 25 gigawatts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 02:57 PM Response to Reply #79 |
92. $100 billion, huh?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 01:52 PM Response to Reply #54 |
88. alternatives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
megatherium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #88 |
94. If we choose none of these, the default will end up being coal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 06:18 PM Response to Reply #94 |
100. gammaray |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
86. coal problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d.l.Green (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 04:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
95. I remember reading about this last year that some Russian mafioso guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
12. Much of the electricity to charge the batteries will come from off-peak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Generating Capacity... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:34 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. It is very difficult and inefficient to "turn down" and "turn up" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. I don't know the specifics... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:44 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. That's an interesting point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femme.democratique (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
18. Cold fusion - hydrogen fuel skeptics, read this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. A google search for Blacklight Power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femme.democratique (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Well considering that many of these same researchers refuse to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. What other credible scientists have reproduced his work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femme.democratique (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. You didn't read the links I provided. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 01:23 PM Response to Reply #41 |
82. Not credible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 01:27 PM Response to Reply #39 |
84. Credible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
20. My son is experimenting with -- I guess it's bio-diesel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 12:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. People are doing that all over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BiggJawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
36. Unfortunately, it's not sustainable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace_prevails (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. We should look to Brasil's energy efforts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 07:14 PM Response to Reply #38 |
61. Thanks for posting, peace_prevails -- and welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 07:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
63. Maybe not as a unique energy source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 08:55 PM Response to Reply #36 |
68. Hmm... good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 08:59 PM Response to Reply #36 |
69. Let the die off begin.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BiggJawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:50 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Yeah, gonna get pretty stinky in the cities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms_Mary (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
87. Possum and crawdad caught my eye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BiggJawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:55 PM Response to Reply #87 |
105. I'm a Hoosier. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms_Mary (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 11:08 AM Response to Reply #105 |
112. Eh, you get a free pass for saying "crawdaddies" LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trekbiker (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 03:39 PM Response to Reply #105 |
122. eat Possum??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BiggJawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 10:48 PM Response to Reply #122 |
127. Greasy, beady-eyed, 472-toothed nasty-assed over-grown rat.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChoralScholar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 02:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
48. Ah yes... Greasel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. You have an odd craving when near those vehicles, though! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 07:21 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. There's a car in Arcata CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
34. I actually had a car salesman tell me that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durablend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 05:07 PM Response to Reply #34 |
57. Did he suggest to buy an Excursion in the meantime? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nevernose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 11:56 PM Response to Reply #34 |
72. Consumer Reports said the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
42. What "rule?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 02:11 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Does the "rule" refer to the impossibility of plugging in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:00 AM Response to Reply #42 |
75. Yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 12:45 PM Response to Reply #75 |
116. Perhaps a simple transformer. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadisonProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
44. If we could only harness the lowly fart... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 02:37 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. we have. we have farms operating entirely off the waste generated by cows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadisonProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:55 PM Response to Reply #45 |
107. aCTUALLY i THAS THINKING MY OWN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
47. You can NOT stop the gearheads! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr.Green93 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
52. Maybe we need to rethink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 03:55 PM Response to Reply #52 |
123. You forgot your sarcasm tag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
53. A REAL alternative: hemp fuel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d.l.Green (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 04:42 PM Response to Reply #53 |
97. Exactly, now there's a sustainable source! Inventor of the diesel engine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 02:18 PM Response to Reply #97 |
118. Indeed. But I think they will be forced to legalize it someday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
56. I own a Toyota Prius and would kill to put solar panels on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 05:12 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Yep. Since the sunroof... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoodwinked (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 12:03 PM Response to Reply #56 |
77. The Prius |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bigmack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #56 |
89. How about .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Technowitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 02:40 PM Response to Reply #56 |
91. That would be a *GREAT* idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-02-05 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
60. So, if Toyota doesn't want to build them with the option, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 09:33 AM Response to Reply #60 |
73. I would build a solar charging station on my house to plug mine in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d.l.Green (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 05:08 PM Response to Reply #73 |
98. I was going to do that but my local solar power company said that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d.l.Green (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 05:44 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Diesel invented his engine using renewable resources... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyskye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #60 |
113. Like these folks have done... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateboomer (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
102. The main thread of this discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 06:22 AM Response to Reply #102 |
108. We don't need alternative energyt. The Rapture is coming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 12:20 PM Response to Reply #108 |
115. Can we harness energy of Christians floating up to heaven? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-03-05 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
106. self delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill_Henebrie (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
126. Energy Crisis is a Hoax... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-05 11:25 PM Response to Reply #126 |
128. What nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill_Henebrie (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 01:22 AM Response to Reply #128 |
130. Voodoo Science? They said that about the "Wright Brothers" also, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 02:15 AM Response to Reply #130 |
131. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill_Henebrie (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 10:29 AM Response to Reply #131 |
132. "If you can imagine it, it's imaginable." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 02:21 PM Response to Reply #132 |
137. DePalma the fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill_Henebrie (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 05:19 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. Depalma was not a Fraud... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 06:21 PM Response to Reply #138 |
139. Evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill_Henebrie (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 10:25 PM Response to Reply #139 |
141. Free Energy..Lentz's Theory.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill_Henebrie (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 10:34 PM Response to Reply #141 |
142. Ohh, I almost forgot "Lentz's Law" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 11:28 PM Response to Reply #142 |
144. Lenz's Law... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-05 11:15 PM Response to Reply #141 |
143. Tewari - another one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill_Henebrie (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 11:23 AM Response to Reply #143 |
146. No, I was was not fooled and neither is our government.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 12:39 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. No Tewari at IAEC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill_Henebrie (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 02:42 PM Response to Reply #147 |
148. Tewari Resume.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC