http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-3209688,00.htmlArnold Decried for Developer's Donation
Tuesday September 30, 2003 2:31 PM
By TOM CHORNEAU Associated Press Writer
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) - Environmentalists are criticizing Arnold Schwarzenegger for accepting a $100,000 campaign donation from a Montana-based development company with a history of environmental complaints. The Republican actor has touted his support of environmental causes in the race to replace Gov. Gray Davis if he is recalled Oct. 7. Friday's donation from Yellowstone Development LLC went to Schwarzenegger's pro-recall campaign committee, which is not subject to the same campaign finance restrictions as his fund to seek the governor's office. The company, owned by Tim Blixseth of Rancho Mirage, is facing fines and other sanctions from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality stemming from complaints that the company illegally dumped sediment into tributaries of the Gallatin River and filled nearby wetlands without permits. <snip>
"If Schwarzenegger is governor, would he be able to say no to the Tim Blixseths of the world?'' said Carl Zichella, regional staff director of the California Sierra Club. ``This is the kind of thing that makes us worry about the leadership Schwarzenegger would provide."Zichella also said the contribution violates Schwarzenegger's promise not to accept special-interest money.
John Arrigo, an administrator for the Montana Department of Environmental Quality's enforcement division, said individual violations by the company were minor, but ``when you put them all together it's pretty significant. We're were talking hundreds of acres.'' <snip>
When Schwarzenegger entered the race he said he did not need to take money from anyone, but he subsequently accepted checks from people and businesses with interests in Sacramento. Seeking to clarify his position, he said he never meant to say he wouldn't take money from anyone. His campaign did acknowledge returning a check from one group, a deputy sheriffs association, because it was a union.