Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drudge: 'SHE HAS BEEN UNDER COVER FOR THREE DECADES'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:09 PM
Original message
Drudge: 'SHE HAS BEEN UNDER COVER FOR THREE DECADES'
http://www.drudgereport.com/matt.htm

A former counter-terrorism official at the CIA and the State Department claimed Tuesday night that outted CIA agent "Valerie Plame" was under cover for three decades and was not a "CIA analyst" as columnist Bob Novak has suggested.

Larry Johnson made the charge on PBS's NEWSHOUR.

"I worked with this woman. She started training with me. She has been under cover for three decades. She is not as Bob Novak suggested a "CIA analyst." Given that, i was a CIA analyst for 4 years. I was under cover. I could not divulge to my family outside of my wife that I worked for the CIA unti I left the Intelligence Agency on Sept. 30, 1989. At that point I could admit it. The fact that she was under cover for three decades and that has been divulged is outrageous. She was put undercover for certain reasons. One, she works in an area where people she works with overseas could be compromised...

"For these journalists to argue that this is no big deal... and if I hear another Republican operative suggesting that, well, this was just an analyst. Fine. Let them go undercover. Let's put them go overseas. Let's out them and see how they like it...

"I say this as a registered Republican. I am on record giving contributions to the George Bush campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let us start a list of all the media figures who called Plame an analyst.
Larry Johnson's statements about Plame leave me speechless.

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Hannity, Limbaugh, Brit Hume, Shep Smith etc etc
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
40. nachman...
does he count as a "journalist"? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. uh-oh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. This looks Huge! Like cia blood is thicker than repugnant water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I saw that segment on PBS
This guy is the real deal. The fact that he is admittedly Repug, but is speaking his disgust so vocally is really telling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I saw him too. It was so obvious as how utterly disgusted this
man was. <and embarrassed to be a Republican>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
47. I watched also and agreed with your feelings
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Do you suppose....
he was handpicked by the CIA to go on PBS BECAUSE he's a republican?? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. Heheh
that's the kind of slippery stuff I expect from the CIA :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. I also saw it
He was totally irate and unwilling to allow anyone to spin the sheer criminal mendacity behind what was done. It was a very, very damning segment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Best_man23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
43. There is an old saying around CIA
You "never" leave the Company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #43
51. I imagine
given the intensity of the work in the CIA, that they are much like other professions with a brotherhood or sisterhood, police, nurses, etc. This saying or motto makes sense. I keep wondering how this sits with Poppy bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. 30 Years!
Good grief that is a very long time. If this is
true the harm that has been done from her disclosure
is staggering. Surely people will be made accountable
for this truely "EVIL" deed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. See Will Pitt's article ("Most Insidious of Traitors") about her work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
46. Ass-kicking article by Will!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Well it can't be quite 30 years unless she was a 10 yr old CIA agent
Another article says she's 40. Maybe Johnson meant part of 2 decades and 1 whole decade. Like started sometime in the 80's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
38. Jinx, we had the same "what's wrong with the numbers?" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
45. would a CIA agent tell you her real age?
:-)

This is a terrible thing. I really hope that somebody goes to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Glad to see drudge is staying 'fair and balanced.'
Did you see his pic of Arnold with the link/cutline "The Home Stretch?" Nice one, Sludge. And silly me, I thought the recall election was next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is starting to get ugly for the repukes and bush*
what will the repuke pundits do now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. 2 words.........Clintons Penis
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmecahors Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. I don't think that line works any more . . .
From what I can tell, people all over the world are nostalgic for the days when Clinton's Penis ran the White House. This current crop of dicks is really fucking up the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Three decades undercover, blown as a petty political ploy.
Dubya's gang of thugs continues to smash America's resources into pieces. Better a bull in a china shop than a Dubya in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why the hell can't anyone seem to spell "outed" properly?
Edited on Tue Sep-30-03 11:17 PM by Spider Jerusalem
Even people who should know get it wrong. Some things irritate me way more than they ought to, and this is one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. it's not 'tham'
it's them.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Damn typos...
one of these days I'll learn to type properly. (But...typos are the only reason I make spelling errors, and it happens rarely. This was taken as-is from Drudge's site...and you'd think after David Brock's book he'd be able to spell "outed" properly...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not to be too contrary
But Valerie Plame is reported to be 40 years old, so if she's been undercover for three decades, she started pretty damn young!

From the WP expose on Wilson:
"As the world now knows, Wilson is married to Valerie Wilson, nee Plame. She is his third wife. She is 40, slim, blonde and the mother of their 3-year-old twins. In the photos in his office, she has the looks of a film star."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25492-2003Sep30.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. not true
that might mean she was in the CIA from 89-01, spanning 3 decades, 80's, 90's, and the millenium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. and that is exactly what this guy was saying
He was in the training classes with her -- where they didn't even reveal their names, just last initials, Larry J -- and he started his work in the '80s.

Listen to the RealAudio link below and there will be NO DOUBT in your mind about the veracity of this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. What's not true?
That she is 40 years old? That's according to the article interviewing her husband. If her tenure included the exact years of 1989 to 2003, then she started undercover work at age 25, which is certainly possible, and worked undercover for 12-14 years, which isn't over 30 years as implied, but is perhaps technically spanning "3 decades". Regardless, it doesn't make any comment I said or quoted "not true". My point was that the statement "3 decades" implies that she has been undercover for at least 30 years, when in fact she probably has been doing so for about half that time at most. It doesn't matter one whit in the substance of the story, I am just pointing this out for accuracy sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treepig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #24
50. why not just say she's been under cover for two millennia
which is technically accurate, and be done with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
48. Bingo. He didn't say 30 years.
My step dad has four decades in local government, yet he's only 56, did he start when he was 16?

Noooooo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Beat me to it
I guess it must be true about women not lying about their age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stupdworld Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Looking very suspect from here
how can we exactly be sure what her position is in the cia? are we allowed to announce that she is a "secret agent" or something?
if you get enough circumstantial evidence, hearsay, etc you can definintely pour gas on the grill, but what will be the match to prove it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. The memo that was circulated to the White House staff said
that she was an undercover agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Listen to the real audio, it really drives the emotion home.
He's not a happy camper about the whole "just an analyst" rhetoric.

http://audio.pbs.org:8080/ramgen/newshour/expansion/2003/09/30/ts.rm?altplay=ts.rm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. Had a thought (hah! see, it happens sometimes!)
Congress should tie a demand for an independent investigation into TraitorGate to the very first penny of the $87 billion Herr Chimp has requested.

After all, this is connected - the money is allegedly for Iraq, which needs to be rebuilt after BushCo illegally invaded that country based on lies, one of which was the Niger "yellow cake" hoax, which of course led us to where we are today.

You want any more money, motherfuckers, then you pay the piper and hand over the political sniper. Word.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. Rule one in Washington - Don't make the spooks mad!
Between trying to lay the faulty intelligence on the CIA for the Iraq war, Cheney's visits and now this -- I'd say the Bushits have crossed the rubicon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. Memory Lane: an event in Poppy's presidency
Anyone remember this: Richard Nixon was extremely concerned about the struggles Russia was going through after the fall of the Soviet Union. He raised the issue that it was critical to help, and that it was likely that impoverished scientists and military would be tempted to sell WMDs to terrorists. He wrote an open letter to Poppy Bush, and had it published in Time. He criticized Poppy for his lack of initiative at this important juncture of history, and warned it could have repercussions for decades.

Plame would have been operating during Poppy's adminstration.

I wonder if, like her husband, she was finding things that smirky and Darth Cheney did not want her to find, or else was not telling them what they wanted to hear. Might be another motive to end her career and compromise all her work and contacts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bucknaked Donating Member (818 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. I love it when they go off on something they know nothing about...
Rush and the others going off about how "she's just an analyst..." so all-of-the-sudden, of course, they're all experts on CIA policy and laws pertaining to national security.

This is what I love about the right's obsession with liberal celebrities, and their assertion that they should just "Shut up!" since they "...don't know dick about anything but acting/singing." Now here, we have Limbaugh going on about something he obviously knows nothing about, making an ass of himself while basking in his own ignorance yet... that's fine! Sheesh!

C'mon, there must be a few "seminar callers" ( :eyes: ) here, on DU. Hope one of them gets on and causes him to loose it again (when one gets past his screeners, it almost makes him worth listening to).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
41. Rush .......going off about how "she's just an analyst
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 05:02 AM by SoCalDem
anal(c)yst...no wonder he got confused :eyes: :evilgrin:..Poor RUSH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #41
56. LOL!
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. CIA does full court press
they are going to avenge the rat-fucking of one of their own by showing Rove and Bush what rat-fucking is about in the major leagues. Rove is going to need so serious analgesics. And then he is going to prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hail to the thief Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
33. This Larry Johnson Guy is great
I'm listening to the audio of Newshour now as I had missed it last night. This guy is pissed off! you can clearly hear the emotion in his voice, I can only imagine how he must of looked like on tv. Man we need a little bit (actually alot of bit) of this guy's fire on the left. The fact that he's a Republican and he's saying all this is great. Not everything should be politicized, wrong is wrong. Herr Rove should roast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. CNNI has been quoting Novak himself as calling her an 'operative'
from the start.

I know he's just trying to muddy up the issue for his readers to cover his sorry butt. However, his use of the word "operative" is already out there on CNNI, using Novak's own writing, in quotes. He knew Palme was a spy, and he probably knew she was a career spy.

Novak is a traitor to our country. Blaming this on partisan politics only helps him to dig his hole deeper. It's hard to believe this guy has received so much media exposure over so many years.

Why doesn't he spend the remainder of his shortened "journalistic" career outing Cheney? At least he'd be doing a service to the country rather than sticking a knife into its national security.

As I've said to many of my friends, the rightwing whackos are the meanest, most unpatriotic people you could ever hope to meet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
36. Twisted Logic

Tonight I heard over and over from Republicans that the Justice Department career people were completely competent to handle this. The kept saying "alleged" before everything - the operative, the white house leaker, etc. I was angry that the questions on cable were focused on whether the democrats are playing politics - we want an independent investigator now, but didn't want one for Clinton - double standard....


No one made my point, which is this -

Wilson says he believes the outing was done primarily not to hurt him/his wife but rather to stop others (I assume CIA) from questioning/coming forward/speaking out. Okay, motive is to chill dissent.

So now we are to believe that a poor career Justice department lawyer with a spouse and children to feed at home will be courageous enough to investigate this and stand up to the likes of the republican party, the bush administration and the conservative media? Right.

That is why an independent prosecutor is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
37. Great Article!
:bounce: Its so funny to watch the Republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlb Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
39. Anyone else amused how a DRUDGE link is cheered now ?
Is Drudge forgiven now that he is pushing a story critical of Bush, or will it be back to business as usual the next time he runs something unflattering to a democrat ?

Myself I am from the "don't shoot the messenger" school. I always found it tiresome wading through dozens of posts damning Drudge as a republican lackey in any thread involving one of his links, and few if any posts at all discussing, confirming or disproving his story.

If you recall he hit the DUI story hard before the 2000 election too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R Hickey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. Drudge Grudge?
OK, Drudge gets my grudging admiration, this time...and I like his hat, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BloodyWilliam Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. Drudge is like a blind ninja.
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 07:31 AM by BloodyWilliam
He doesn't always hit the mark with his shuriken, but he knows how to throw.

As a journalist I think he's a right-leaning schmuck who's waaaaay too fast on the trigger to have any credibility, but that said he has been more active in scoop-hunting than anyone in the mainstream media. And whether or not we like what happened to Clinton, he is the man who broke the story.

On EDIT: BloodyWilliam, master of the crappy analogy. :hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
49. Novak's column in todays Post lies again: Wilson contributed to Gore
In fact as someone posted here:


 On CNBC Capitol Report they just pushed Wilson on the $1000 Kerry
donation
and he came back with, 'No, it was $2000, in two $1000 payments'; then
he went on to say that what Ed Gillespie also knew but didn't tell
anybody, was that Wilson also donated $2000 to Bush/Cheney in 2000! But
that he would not be supporting aWol this time because of their war and
peace blunder!"
Which is significant, in light of the facr that he insists "that's what prompted him to figure out why was he chosen for the mission"
Good research, Nofacts!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
52. That's a huge social network then
three decades worth of spookery blown. Code RED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
53. Hot damn, the media whores are finally being
exposed. Rush..you reading this,asshole?

Treason IS a big deal!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
54. "The CIA is hanging tough. They want blood" says anonymous admin official
...

The CIA "is hanging tough. They want blood," said an administration official speaking on the condition of anonymity.

By week's end, this official predicted, the White House will have identified and fired the offending individual to limit political damage.

(more)

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1001leakanalysis.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. Open season on Rove!
Jolly-doubleplusgood!
This could blossom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. "week's end"
This coming Friday's late evening data dump will be verrrry interestink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. I would be ecstatic if Rove or someone was ousted, BUT I have
to believe that the WHorehouse and Repugs not wanting a special investigation only means one thing.

Someone (maybe several people) will go down for this, BUT it will only be puppets not puppeteers(sp?).

I want to have faith in Wilson as he seems one smart cookie and has kept the info pretty close to the chest, but knowing these slimballs and how they do biz...I believe they will hand over peeps who will not affect this admin one way or the other.

More pawns thrown to the press, not the players. Let's hope my feelings are 100% inaccurate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC