Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: A Promise Unfulfilled: Iraq's Oil Output Is Lagging

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:55 PM
Original message
NYT: A Promise Unfulfilled: Iraq's Oil Output Is Lagging
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/02/international/middleeast/02ministry.html?pagewanted=print&position=

With vast reservoirs of oil and the potential to rival Saudi Arabia as a megaproducer, Iraq has long tantalized the world's energy industry, as well as economists and political leaders worried about the impact of high oil prices.

But the new Iraqi government's glaring failure last week to agree on an oil minister and the sectarian bargaining over this crucial appointment, as well as the unabated insurgency, have been new reminders of the political faults that keep the country's petroleum promise unrealized.

"Unfortunately, oil in Iraq is being politicized more and more," Issam al-Chalabi, who was Iraq's oil minister in the late 1980's, told a conference of scholars and oil-company executives in Washington in late April. "This is dangerous."

Mr. Chalabi, now a consultant based in Jordan and Baghdad, is not related to Ahmad Chalabi, the former exile who, in the latest of his political ups and downs, has been appointed interim oil minister.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...Just wondering about that last line...
How does the NYT define 'related'? I mean, Iraq runs on the basis of clans that go back generations and generations, right? ... Well, not like it's important...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. But, But, But
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I really wonder about that...
I remember an article published about 1 year ago regarding the viability of the oil reserves, stating along the lines that even if the oil fields are put completely on line, that the amount of oil that will be extracted will be minimal, do to the fact that during the time of the sanctions, spare parts and machinery weren't able to be bought. Resulting in a cobbled together oil system. Because of this, the procedures used to extract the oil were substandard, thus "muddying" the oil field. So any real usable oil from those field had been greatly reduced to as little as 15%.
I wish I could find that article. It was part of a larger one talking about how the oil produced in Iraq was going to help pay for reconstruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Unfortunately, oil in Iraq is being politicized more and more..."
This whole boondoggle was political! From Bush's lies, to the Halliburton "no-bid" contracts, from the half-assed Iraqi elections, to the plastic turkey, from the construction of 14 US military bases to the staging of Iraq as a jumping off point for invasions of Syria and/or Iran and all points in between, this whole mess has been one huge clusterfolly!

So why shouldn't the oil be "politicized" as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gdub Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's a curve ball
Has anyone considered whether the Bush administration actually wants to keep Iraqi oil off the market? I am becoming more and more convinced that US government policy currently favors high oil prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You may have a point !!
Fewer oil barrels on the market mean higher gasoline prices, which mean higher profits for Big Oil.

In October 1986, Cheney said "let us rid ourselves of the fiction that low oil prices are somehow good for the United States."

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=28462

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gdub Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks, that's excellent. Here is some more information on this...


Re: I am interested in anyone with support for Peak Oil as a hox

Various places on the Internet make put forth the proposition that Peak Oil is junk science, going so far as to decribe it as a hoax. Further still, some say the purpose of the Peak Oil hoax is to drive up current oil prices by creating a perception of scarcity.

Supporting arguments posit the goals of a Peak Oil hoax as:

1) sabotaging the Chinese economy
2) created windfall profits for Western oil companies to fund the next generation of exploration and development investment
3) propping up the US dollar through artificial inflation of "petrodollar" demand and IMF loan reliance by importing nations

Going further, the Peak Oil as a hoax theory points to the entire abiotic/biotic debate, which suggests that hydrocarbons are not, in fact, *renewable* resources and that the Russians have successfully developed technology to exploit it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. The whole point was to keep the oil FROM the market.
It's working great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC