Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Partial Bith Abortion Banned by House of Rep.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
L.A.dweller Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:49 PM
Original message
Partial Bith Abortion Banned by House of Rep.
WASHINGTON - The House voted Thursday to ban a type of abortion that for years has been at the center of the debate over a woman's reproductive rights. President Bush (news - web sites) has promised to sign the bill into law and opponents say they will immediately challenge it in court.

The bill, passed 281-142, could be taken up by the Senate as early as Friday. Bush's signature would make it the first federal law since Roe v. Wade (news - web sites) in 1973 to restrict a specific abortion procedure.

The drive to stop partial birth abortion "will finally become law and the performance of this barbaric procedure will finally come to an end," said House Judiciary Committee (news - web sites) Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis.

(snip)
"This will be an important step toward building a culture of life in America," said White House press secretary Scott McClellan, who praised the House and urged the Senate "to move quickly on this important piece of legislation as well."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1896&ncid=1896&e=2&u=/nm/20031002/us_nm/congress_abortion_dc_3

See the Roll Call on the bill :http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031002/ap_on_go_co/house_rollcall_abortion_1

I am proud of all the CA rep's that voted no on the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I knew my Dem Congressman would support this
He disappoints me when he votes this way (Michaud). His anti-abortion views make him a target. It's why I didn't support him in the primary last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is just the beginning
Roe v. Wade is next. The day after George gets Re-selected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L.A.dweller Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If voters (esp. women) only knew what is planned for the future
this man would not get re-elected. Hell, they would want him out ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nope
Next will be parental notification.

It will be another attempt at a wedge issue just like partial birth abortion.

And just like partial birth abortion, many Democrats will vote for it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The reason is
Many Dems are not overly extreme on these topics. Most of us support freedom of choice, but all freedoms have their limits. Partial birth and parental notification both strike a chord with many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calm_blue_ocean Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good Point
For all of you people who like the Roe v Wade decision, a portion of the majority opinion that is relevant to the partial birth abortion situation:

"With respect to the State's important and legitimate interest in potential life, the 'compelling' point is at viability. This is so because the fetus then presumably has the capability of meaningful life outside the mother's womb. State regulation protective of fetal life after viability thus has both logical and biological justifications. If the State is interested in protecting fetal life after viability, it may go so far as to proscribe abortion during that period, except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother."

Uphold Roe v Wade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. If you give the govt. the right to tell you "You Can't..."
You'll give them the right to tell you, "You must..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calm_blue_ocean Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Does this saying apply to traditionally prohibited activities?
Like murder, kidnapping, rape, etc.

Should the government stop prohibiting these actions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. of course
Gephardt missed the vote. While Kucinich voted NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC