One of the hallmarks of a White House under siege is the absence of good answers to important questions. Where, for example, are the weapons of mass destruction upon which President Bush built his case for war against Iraq? Why were 35 million Americans living in poverty last year -- about 1.4 million more than the year before? Why, in the same period, did the number of people without health insurance rise by 2.4 million to reach 44 million? What exactly is the plan for confronting the massive federal budget deficit? Where is Saddam Hussein? Where is Osama bin Laden?
And who in the administration might have blown the cover of a CIA agent after her husband publicly criticized Bush? And why should the public trust Attorney General John Ashcroft, a Bush appointee, to conduct an impartial criminal inquiry into the CIA matter? When Ashcroft was asked that at a news conference last week, he stomped out of the room. Absent clear answers, it appears the weight of the questions themselves is becoming increasingly hard for some to bear.
"If there isn't a good answer given, then there isn't a good answer to give," said Larry Sabato, director of the nonpartisan Center for Politics at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. "It means the White House is in tough shape," Sabato said. "It is not just backed into one corner. They're backed into several corners, and they're going to have to figure a way out of all these corners if Bush is going to recover and win the next election."
The third year of presidencies is historically difficult. Promises and rhetoric begin to wear thin, replaced by the hard realities of what can be the most difficult job in the world. If mistakes, or enemies, have been made, all are amplified by the onset of the long campaign season.
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/1003/05bush.html