Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill for universal health system OK'd (in CA)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:47 AM
Original message
Bill for universal health system OK'd (in CA)
Bill for universal health system OK'd

SACRAMENTO – The state Senate approved a bill yesterday to create a universal health care system overseen by an elected commissioner, although many details have to be worked out.

Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, urged senators to send her measure to the Assembly so negotiations could continue, with no funding plan likely to be added until next year. Senators agreed on a 24-14 vote.

Seven million Californians have no health insurance, and an additional 4 million had none at some point in the past two years, Kuehl said. She said an additional 4 million people are underinsured.

(snip)

Sen. Dave Cox, R-Fair Oaks, said the plan could cost $8 billion and predicted it would result in rationing of health care services. The Senate approved a less-ambitious version of Kuehl's bill in 2003 but it died in the Assembly.

Associated Press

From http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050601/news_1n1region.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Holy crap! Taxing the rich? Universal health care?
Any moment, Bush will be forced to declare war on California...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. time to move to Californiaaaaaaa!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. many states have bandaid programs-all with administrative waste--a NEW
approach--needs to be taken to patch up all the patches and bandaids.
Time to the Congress to do their job---put its citizens first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Right on... if you can afford it
I heard the median home price in CA hit 500K. That's nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amy6627 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. It's pronounced Cal-e-forn-ya! You girlie man!
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. drats--i just do not have Arnies dialect--oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. LOL
So true, so true... :)

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. no doubt he would be silly enough to put his nose into the rift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Repug Sen. using 'rationing' as a scare tactic again.


Sen. Dave Cox, R-Fair Oaks, said the plan could cost $8 billion and predicted it would result in rationing of health care services. The Senate approved a less-ambitious version of Kuehl's bill in 2003 but it died in the Assembly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Ha! We already 'ration health care'!
How many people can't go to the doctor when they're sick because they can't afford it? What is that if not rationing?

*Not arguing w/ you...just adding to your point! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. No kidding, We've been rationing healthcare for years now
The entire HMO system is based on rationing and going through a gate keeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Universal healthcare would attract new businesses to California
since this plan could cut firms operating expenses. This would put pressure on firms in other parts of the country to cut health care cost and/ or implement a similar healthcare measure in their states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh no! not health care rationing!
Sen. Cox, look around. Most employer-sponsored plans have a heavy rationing component. They call it 'cost management.'
This is the most tired argument of those against universal health plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. They also have large "bureaucracies".
Another old saw. Cuz it's far better to work with a corporate bureaucracy, than a government bureaucracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Health care is already rationed!
7 million people in California don't have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogue emissary Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Democrats in every so called blue state . . .
should push for some form of universal health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. exactly
As daleo notes, that is exactly how it worked in Canada -- one province first, followed by others, followed by a coherent national set of rules.

(Also, hospital insurance came first, followed by health care insurance. Dental care and drugs have been included in some provinces, but not all, and it's high time.)

In this among many ways, I would really love to see progressive people and organizations acting more locally in the US. Starting small and growing is really a lot more realistic than always pinning one's hopes on that one big jackpot in the White House.

Maine voted to adopt a universal single-public-payer health insurance scheme a couple of years ago. As far as I can ever tell, not much progress has been made since then. From 2002:
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2002/september/single_payer_moves_a.php
... 2003:
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2003/may/support_continues_fo.php

That site (Physicians for a National Health Health Program) has loads of info and ideas.

http://www.pnhp.org/facts/q_a_by_dr_john_geyman_president_2005.php

10. What if states move ahead with single-payer universal coverage before NHI?

As Thomas Bodenheimer observed 10 years ago, some states may develop single-payer systems of universal coverage as demonstration projects before NHI is initiated. That may well occur, since considerable momentum in that direction has been developing in California, Oregon, Vermont, Massachusetts, Maine, and some other states. A state enacting single-payer universal coverage would likely establish a new non-profit foundation, funded by the state, to pay for all medically necessary services, including emergency care, dental, vision, mental health, long-term care, and alternative medicine. Such a plan would be financed with federal funds already allocated to the state’s public programs (Medicare, Medicaid, S-CHIP, current government expenditures for employee health benefits), as well as by additional income and payroll taxes. Universal coverage would be provided to the state’s population without any exclusions for pre-existing conditions. In the longer term, all payments would be through an NHI trust fund, with a shift to funding by a progressive, income tax and employer payroll taxes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
15. "Rationed" health care is better than no health care. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
17. This is really good news.
Feeling better about CA Dems right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. This is how universal health care came into being in Canada
First one province (Saskatchewan) managed the trick. That caused pressure on other provinces, until finally the federal government stepped in to broker a national policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
19. Well done California
I hope it's a beacon of light onto other states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. it's cheaper that way to boot
the bigger the pool the CHEAPER it is.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC