Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Concerns at A.C.L.U. Over Document Shredding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 11:02 AM
Original message
NYT: Concerns at A.C.L.U. Over Document Shredding
Edited on Sun Jun-05-05 11:54 AM by DeepModem Mom
Concerns at A.C.L.U. Over Document Shredding
By STEPHANIE STROM
Published: June 5, 2005


The American Civil Liberties Union has been shredding some documents over the repeated objections of its records manager and in conflict with its longstanding policies on the preservation and disposal of records.

The matter has fueled a dispute at the organization over internal operations, one of several such debates over the last couple of years, and has reignited questions over whether the A.C.L.U.'s own practices are consistent with its public positions.

The organization has generally advocated for strong policies on record retention and benefited from them, most recently obtaining and publicizing documents from the government about prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

The debate over the use of shredders is reminiscent of one late last year over the organization's efforts to collect a wide variety of data on its donors, even as it criticizes corporations and government agencies for accumulating personal data as a violation of privacy rights.

Janet Linde, who oversaw the A.C.L.U.'s archives for over a decade until she resigned last month, raised concerns in e-mail messages and memorandums for over two years that officials' use of shredders in their offices made a mockery of the organization's policy to supervise document destruction and created potential legal risks....


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/05/national/05aclu.html


IMPORTANT EDIT: I thought this story appeared on page-one today. It did not. Sorry, my bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. OOps!! No story here, Supremes done ruled that shredding
anything anytime is A-Ok, in fact, it's what your MOM would want you to do!! Now Arthur Andersen are heroes and obedient children, instead of slimy, soul-stealing slugs from the Twilight Zone! (apologies to all real slugs, those who are slimy, and soul-stealers, as well as the actual Twilight Zone!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's not what the unanimous decision found of course.
It found that the instructions to the jury were vague (which they were). It did NOT find that shredding of documents was okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting to note that within one day we're seeing articles
Edited on Sun Jun-05-05 11:12 AM by Judi Lynn
attempting to discredit both Amnesty International and the ACLU, immediately after they have published information on the Bush administration's mistreatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and at Guantanamo Bay (soon to be realeased photos of Abu Ghraib, and the Koran defilement by guards).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep, that was my immediate reaction as well....
it is so obvious I don't think it works anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. THIS IS ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE NYT!!!!
NO WORD OF THE DSM! No word of Arther Anderson, No word of Iraq, but the ACLU possibly doing something bad is front page news, FUCK THOSE MOTHER FUCKERS!

If you had any doubt that the NYT's is one of our media enemies, you are living in fantasy land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. SO SORRY -- This story was not on page one. My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. My thoughts, exactly.
The alternative could be a massive infiltration of the ACLU, itself, with the sleepers now awakening. (Shudder) I prefer the planted fairy tales solution - it fits the m.o. of the ruling (w)unta, and the infiltration notion is not easy to contemplate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yep, not easy to contemplate, but stranger things have surely happened!
That thought occurred to me, too.

Of course you remember the organized program to start feeding young right-wing ideologues into journalism, law, education, etc. started a couple of decades ago, when most people had no idea it was going on at all.

Look how far we've come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. This doesnt sound right to me.
Is there any evidence that anything has been shredded that shouldnt have been?

Not every piece of paper that gets produced in an office needs to be archived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I shred EVERYTHING that has our name/address or personal info
especially when I planned to toss it..It's not safe to throw stuff out that can identify you..

Can you imagine the storge difficulties of large organizations that NEVER threw any paper away??

Not every document is the Dead Sea Scrolls:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I should hope the ACLU shred some things!!
Like any record of my donations that have my credit card number and expiration date on them.

All organizations should shred some things past a point. The ACLU is a private organization
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC