Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carrier Jets Not Bombing Iraq Lately

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:53 PM
Original message
Carrier Jets Not Bombing Iraq Lately
BY ADNAN MALIK, Associated Press Writer
17 minutes ago



ABOARD THE USS CARL VINSON - Dozens of fighter jets have been roaring off the deck of this aircraft carrier to patrol Iraq for four weeks now but haven't dropped a single bomb — a clear sign of success, the ship's commander said Wednesday.

The last time the planes bombed a target in support of the U.S.-led multinational force and Iraqi troops was May 8 when fighters dropped six precision bombs during a battle with insurgents, said Capt. Kevin M. Donegan.

"If airplanes come back with all their bombs on, that's a good thing because that means the soldiers (on the ground) did not need help and that things are under control," Donegan said.

~snip~
more: http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050609/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_u_s__navy_1

What planet is this guy on? Tell that to the men and women on the ground getting killed daily. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. No need blow up shit if it is already blown up. Do they think we are
idiots?

Between the insurgents and the shit we already blew up nothing is left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are we saving the bombs for late this month
or early next? (Due to the delay in the Bolton nomination)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. $1 million + a day to operate a carrier...
Very expensive toys.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. PS - and the next two carriers are named?
USS Ronald Reagan & USS George H W Bush! Gag me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. FIVE American soldiers died in the last 24 HOURS!
FUCKERS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geo55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hmmm....gotta save them bombs for a "fresh" target ,
Iran comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. 500lbs bombs v. suicide car bombs?
what are they thinking they can do? kill the person holding the detonator from 35,000 feet? Morans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NinetySix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. What are the planes supposed to do,
drop a quarter-million-dollar precision guided bomb on a guy planting an IED on a roadside in the middle of the night? Yeah, let's do that -- remember how defense spending supposedly bankrupted the Soviet Union?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
artr2 Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Aircraft maintenance & Down time
As a former naval aircraft maintenance technician, those aircraft cost so much per hour to fly. if they are not flying so much it saves wear & tear on the aircraft and it doesn't use up so much fuel. Even a Pentagon awash in cash has to save somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. 42,000 such sorties during the illegal no-fly-zone period.
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 10:23 PM by oblivious
But with targets hit. Imagine how many bombs and missiles have fallen on that poor country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. That would be because the tanker situation is
getting very bad.

The Navy lost it's airborne tankers recently, and has to depend on the USAF now.

This limits the time and distance Navy/Marine Corps jets travel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. guess we've done our job . . . nothing left to bomb . . .
we've literally destroyed the country (to save it, don'tcha know), and left huge areas uninhabitable due to depleted uranium contamination . . . we should be s-o-o-o-o-o proud of ourselves! . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. They've received an update from HQ ...
"Slow down a bit guys, Halliburton can't keep up with you"

It must be getting to the point where the only targets big enough
for the fly-boys to hit from 10,000 feet are newly built (albeit shoddy
and incredibly over-priced) droppings from the "humanitarian effort".
All of the old stuff (power stations, water-processing plants, sewage
farms) has been bombed to gravel over the last 15 years ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. No it means that the fighting is either so close one of those bombs
would either kill everyone involved - bad - or blow up another aspirin factory by accident - bad.

They're simply too big to use in urban warfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. What "urban warfare", I thought thought the LIAR sent the troops for oil
Silly me, that's the last time I try to follow the money :shrug:

Exxon Mobil reaps record profits
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1134616.stm

Revealed: how oil giant influenced Bush (Exxon)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1531884

The Going to War File
http://www.iraqwar.org/how-and-why-the-war-file.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. The Air Force is doing it
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 28, 2005 - A U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon provided close air support to ground troops fighting to recover two slain helicopter crewmen in the vicinity of Baquba, Iraq, on May 26, officials said.

The ground troops had to battle terrorist insurgents while performing search-and-recovery operations. The F-16 reportedly suppressed enemy small-arms fire by dropping a laser-guided "guided bomb unit-12" bomb.

An Air Force joint tactical attack controller was embedded with the Army ground units. This enabled the ground units to communicate with the F-16, ultimately directing the pilot to the impact point of the bomb, officials said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. I honestly didn't know we were still routinely bombing IraqNam
How in the hell does air defense help any in a guerilla war?

Guess it just goes to show that we truly didn't learn one goddamned thing in Viet Nam, we are simply repeating patterns of failure over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
17. Seems like carrier ops are dangerous enough ..
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 09:05 AM by DemoTex
I'd be as nervous as a cat scratching shit on a sidewalk if I had to recover 70 bomb-laden fighter jets a day. Are they really landing back on the carrier with bombs on the racks? Or are they dropping them in the desert or open water?

One little slip (blown tire, landing gear collapse) and you have another USS Forrestal (July 29, 1967 Gulf of Tonkin) tragedy.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Remember, aviators wanted and planned this war
This is why ground pounders should have felt insulted when President Bush 'celebrated' "Mission Accomplished" on a carrier deck.

Someone needs to tell the Vinson's skipper that nearly ninety US military personnel were killed in Iraq in May. Eight this week alone.

You just can't trust aviators who never get their nails dirty on issues like this.

But note that Bush, Rumsfeld and Meyers were all aviators and don't have a clue about how ground wars are fought and ignored the protests of the army hierarchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Welcome to DU Mookie! Good point.
It is kind of like allowing a pilot to rise to president or CEO of an airline. It seldom works (Frank Borman at Eastern Air Lines comes to mind).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
21. They are saving their bombs for Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
22. 'We've got a hidden roadside IED, come bomb it..."
What a fucking pinhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
23. Last week in LBN we read about "fireballs" torching Iraqi fields and trees
We came to agreement that these are flares being fired from choppers to confuse heat-seeking SAMs. From this we inferred that the insurgency has many more SAMs than we're being told, and that air missions are much more dangerous.

If this reasoning holds up, perhaps it's become too dangerous to fly sorties.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. Maybe they are probing Iranian air defenses
And this article is just propaganda cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC