http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=8736802NEW YORK (Reuters) - Gold's lengthy coupling to the dollar will end as supply/demand dynamics change and other currencies may come to the fore, Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX.TO: Quote, Profile, Research) CEO Greg Wilkins said at the Reuters Mining Summit on Wednesday.
"There will be a decoupling in the next 5 to 10 years," said Wilkins at the summit, held at the Reuters office in New York.
Gold is priced in dollars on international bullion markets, and the precious metal has a tight inverse price correlation with the U.S. currency, he said.
snip>
The euro's influence could also wane if there were changes in China's foreign exchange policy and a revaluation of the yuan, he said. A stronger euro versus the dollar makes dollar-priced gold cheaper for non-U.S. investors.
snip>
"If China, Japan and the other Asian countries become a basket of currencies then it could become more important than the euro," said Wilkins of the world's No. 3 gold producer.
snip>
Gold prices may be about to benefit from both volatility in and a lack of confidence in several of the world's major currencies, with gold's price in euros a key indicator, said analysts on Tuesday.
more...
Trade Deficit – Be careful what you wish for(Bit of marketing for their fund, but raises some interesting points)
http://www.merkfund.com/merk-perspective/insights/2005-06-09.htmlThis Friday on June 10th, the April trade balance will be released. Expectations are for US$58 billion, up from $55 billion in March. In March, the trade deficit had “unexpectedly” narrowed, mostly due to a slowdown of US economic activity.
As the currency markets anticipate Friday’s report, let us keep a few things in mind. First, $58 billion is a very large number; annualized, the U.S. is anticipated to import $700 billion more worth of goods and services than it exports. For the U.S. dollar to remain stable, the trading partners will have to accumulate U.S. dollars at a rate of close to $2 billion a day. For the dollar to fall, foreign trading partners don’t need to stop buying U.S. dollars, they merely need to buy less, for example by diversifying to other hard currencies.
When a slight narrowing of the trade deficit was released last month, the U.S. dollar received short-term relief (the turmoil with the European constitution also helped the dollar short-term). While many of us are fixated with a trade deficit that few economists believe is sustainable, a lower trade deficit is not automatically good news.
The balance of trade is affected by economic activity domestically and abroad. To correct the global imbalances, increased consumption outside of the U.S. or a higher savings rate inside the U.S. would be helpful. However, Europe remains stagnant, and Asia is expected to slow its rapid growth. Conversely, we do not expect U.S. real incomes to rise sharply, as the global imbalances make this exercise an uphill struggle. Global overproduction (through Asian currency subsidy and U.S. fiscal and monetary policies) leads to high raw material costs; a flood of cheap Asian goods combined with a highly indebted U.S. consumer provide for little pricing power. The result is accelerated outsourcing, not exactly the recipe for real income growth as the U.S. labor force is the one being outsourced.
This leaves an economic slowdown in the U.S. as a path to reduce the trade balance. While this “consumers voting with their feet” scenario may be unavoidable sooner or later, it is certainly not a scenario for anyone to look forward to. It would mean that the economy is slowing down, leaving consumers with a lot of debt, and the housing market in danger territory. Consumers may then opt to cash in any “liquid” assets, most notably their stock holdings to reduce their debt. Asian central banks would have less of a need to purchase U.S. dollars, making the dollar more vulnerable.
snip>
Unless the structural imbalances are addressed in a serious manner, with a policy shift that encourages savings, the pressure on the dollar is unlikely to disappear.
In the current environment, policy makers choose between driving the imbalances to further extremes (the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD, is warning of a $900 billion trade deficit next year), OR a recession. more...