Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More in Congress want Iraq exit strategy, Unease grows as war backing fall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 08:14 AM
Original message
More in Congress want Iraq exit strategy, Unease grows as war backing fall
WASHINGTON -- Faced with plummeting public support for the war in Iraq, a growing number of members of Congress from both parties are reevaluating the reasons for the invasion and demanding the Bush administration produce a plan for withdrawing US troops.

A bipartisan group of House members is drafting a resolution that calls on the administration to present a strategy for getting the United States out of Iraq, reflecting an increasing restlessness about the war in a chamber that 2 1/2 years ago voted overwhelmingly to support the use of force in Iraq.
...
Representative Walter Jones of North Carolina, a conservative Republican who voted to authorize force, said his district is growing weary of a war that has cost the lives of more than 1,600 US troops and left more than 12,000 wounded.
...
Jones said he felt misled by the administration on the reasons for the war because no weapons of mass destruction have been found. ''If I knew what I knew today, I would not have voted for the resolution," Jones said.

Representative Marty Meehan, a Lowell Democrat who also voted for the war resolution, said he and some Democratic colleagues are working with five to 10 House Republicans on a resolution calling for an exit strategy to ease the United States out of Iraq. He said he hoped to get the support of 25 or more Republicans, despite the fact that only six voted against the war resolution.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/06/11/more_in_congress_want_iraq_exit_strategy/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Music to my ears that can't happen soon enough!
Now, if they'd all just link the DSM in there somewhere; I know of the perfect scapegoats.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renaissanceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. That's just what I was going to say.
If only Kerry had said this during the debates: "Knowing what I know now, I wouldn't have authorized the war. I believed the president, and he lied to me."


http://www.cafepress.com/liberalissues/472476
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRK7376 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's about time
COngress gets their head out of their butts and start coming up with an exit strategy. The way I see it after 8 years of the shrub dictatorship we will have been at war for 7 of those years....Is that a whiff of Vietnam I smell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. "reevaluating the reasons for the invasion "
hummm... reevaluating the lies? which one? and could it be possible that after reevaluating the lies they will still support the invasion? Who knows with this bunch of clowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Jesus Freakin CHRIST!
Never mind that anyone with ANY sense KNEW that Iraq was absolutely NO threat to the United States.

Never mind that the death toll approaches 1700 and there's NO telling what bu$hler's little war is costing the economy.

But let the 06 mid-term elections get close and SUDDENLY Congre$$ starts doing its JOB?!?!?

:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. John Kennith Galbraith once said something to the effect
that while political courage is lauded in speeches and civics one must never under estimate the salutary effects of political cowardice - fear of losing their seat has made many an elected official act for the common good despite his own deep personal convictions otherwise.

Or as Mel Brooks said in Blazing Saddles: "Holy smokes - we have to protect our phony baloney jobs gentlemen!"

These are small and petty men - and Personally I don't care what the hell makes them put pressure on * to get out of Iraq - I don't care how the hell we get out - all I know is we have to get out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
44. yes, they're doing the right thing...after exhausting all the alternatives
But, I, as you, will take whatever is necessary to stop this madness. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Castilleja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. You said it!
They are somehow just a little late to the party there.... I guess they can take off their blindfolds and earplugs now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. The question, Walter Jones, is WHY you didn't know. I knew. Many people
knew. Why didn't you, you lazy partisan hack.

Here's an exit strategy...Send some planes and helicopters over today and pick up EVERY American in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It wasn't just GOPer Jones that voted to use force, it was also a bunch...
...of Dems who were afraid to say "no" back when the vote was taken. Why didn't they know there were no WMDs? Because they didn't get the National Intelligence estimate summary that stated that that there were deep reservations about the presence of WMDs in Iraq. All Congress got was all of the preliminary information that portrayed Iraq as armed to the teeth with WMDs of all types.

IMHO, it's going to take more than a few Congresspeople presenting a resolution to force the NeoCon Junta to change course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. It was never intel: It was public opinion. Now that the polls are tanking
the legislators are making excuses for following the polls. They never gave a shit either way, or had the character to ask the questions at the time. They follow public opinion, and the truth be damned.

This is proof we're making a difference. Our protests and action groups, especially Move ON and Common Cause, which are not really allied to either party have effected public opinion, finally, and we're getting our "representatives" to listen.

The blogs and emails and petitions and fund raisers are making a difference. This puts PNAC on notice that they can't do this again in Iran or Syria or china or anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. it was MANUFACTURED CONSENT
by our leaders... same as it ever was, but your right, we are having an impact, by simply spreading the word but that is no guarantee when your dealing with FASCIST and make NO mistake that is what they ARE.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. Somebody better Stand up for our soldiers !
Goddamn Congress went along with this fucking trumped-up bloodbath and now they only react because they are worried about votes. Goddamn traitors all of them. I will not cast a vote for any politician that voted for this fucking war. I voted for Kerry to get Bush out but I held my nose.

WHO IS THINKING ABOUT OUR SOLDIERS?!? They don't want to be there and they are dying because of A PACK OF LIES !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheozone Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I couldn't agree with you more, I feel exactly the same! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. Bingo n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. WE of the peace movement need to stand up -- and need a strategy!
The answer is, as always, that you can NEVER leave ANYTHING of importance up to the politicians. Democracy works only when the PEOPLE are mobilized. Now, a majority seems to be tiring of the war, but the peace MOVEMENT is still on the margins.

Elsewhere under this news item's larger thread I discuss PEACE MOVEMENT STRATEGY. Those interested can email me or send a DU message, or start a thread I suppose, discussing it (I've tried a few times and will try again).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
38. Point of order
All the soldiers volunteered for this shit. For whatever reason they signed on the dotted line. The Iraqis didn't. They woke up in terror some night with bombs falling on their heads. I think losing sight of that fact is a mistake.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. I didn't lose sight of Jack Shit.
You lost sight of the fact that the vast majority of our troops on active duty/reserves didn't sign up under Bush or since the Iraq war started. And because I am pissed at the treatment of the military doesn't mean I don't give a shit about the Iraqis.

I suppose you think all the troops that volunteered since Bush are complicit in the crimes of the administration. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, August 7, 1964
Joint Resolution of Congress H.J. RES 1145 August 7, 1964

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

That the Congress approves and supports the determination of the President, as Commander in Chief, to take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression.

Section 2. The United States regards as vital to its national interest and to world peace the maintenance of international peace and security in southeast Asia. Consonant with the Constitution of the United States and the Charter of the United Nations and in accordance with its obligations under the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty, the United States is, therefore, prepared, as the President determines, to take all necessary steps, including the use of armed force, to assist any member or protocol state of the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty requesting assistance in defense of its freedom.

Section 3. This resolution shall expire when the President shall determine that the peace and security of the area is reasonably assured by international conditions created by action of the United Nations or otherwise, except that it may be terminated earlier by concurrent resolution of the Congress.

Repealed, June 24, 1970

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's CYA time
A lot of these guys have to run next year against pictures of local kids in coffins. This might be the tipping point, when the sane GOP finally revolts against the nutcases and warmongers who have taken over their party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. We're Winning!
When Republicans like Jones "fess up" its a victory for peace.

I'm still waiting for my Sen. "DiFi" of CA to say:
"If I knew what I knew today, I would not have voted for the resolution"

I know that the people at the DU deserve some credit for the turnaround we're seeing.

Despite cancellation of the news and the media's focus on the Micheal Jackson trial, run-away bride and a host of other meaningless events, somehow the truth is coming through.

The Dems need to seize on Bush's incompetence for '06 and propose an exit strategy that can be endorsed by all of the Party's constiuents.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. I am Still waiting
for kerry to say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. Finally .....Wake the sleeping giant...
And get all the senators together......Prepare to Impeach BUSH FOR PURE LIES AND SPREADING OF HATE!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ah, so the horrendous slaughter of innocent people doesn't motivate them
but the unease of their consituencies does? Walter Jones says his district is "growing weary" of the "war." Nice, Walter. Wouldn't want your voters to be bored.

This isn't nearly good enough. Impeachment and imprisonment should be our goal. If they just back out now because they are bored, without punishing the guilty, then no message is sent.

I'll take withdrawal however we can get it, but I won't let up on calling for prosecution. The murderers should by held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Just to clarify
"weary" means "not wanting to experience any more of.." "Tired, exhausted", not "bored". I think it's safe to say that we're all weary of the GOP, BushCo, and bloodshed at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. It's still too weak
It doesn't mean outraged, horrified, sickened to the core of their souls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I'm sure the newpaper reporter
doesn't speak for every soul in the district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildcat78 Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Imprisonement is too nice!
Bush and Cheny should be tried for treason, found guilty and placed in front of firing squad. That would be my only satisifaction.

DeWine is up for reelection in '06 and he couldn't give a damn about what we think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. Walter Jones (R: Hack) sounds sanier than John Kerry
Jones said he felt misled by the administration on the reasons for the war because no weapons of mass destruction have been found. ''If I knew what I knew today, I would not have voted for the resolution," Jones said.

I recall Kerry saying the opposite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I was thinking the same thing
Does Kerry really believe in this war, or is it just a matter of not wanting to say "I was wrong" or "I was mislead"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. stop BASHING
:evilgrin:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. Impeachment, not an exit stragety is urgent
After buchco is gone the troops can be called home.

No to war in Iran !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. Words I think might have made a big difference
if uttered by Kerry before the election:

''If I knew what I knew today, I would not have voted for the resolution," Jones said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Kerry
Would have won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. Well I still think
he did. But that would have made it more of a sure thing, certainly.

I think he got nervous about being seen as changing his mind after all the stupid "flip flop" stuff. Not saying he blew it on that one was a big mistake, in my humble opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. Proposed Peace MOVEMENT strategy to go along with such measures
The peace movement is definitely not as strong as the popular support for peace now would sustain. And that is something that the peace movement activists need to rectify in three concrete strategic ways:

First, and most important, there needs to be some kind of mass-based peace organization to reach out to a much higher degree to the mainstream, the people who have NEVER been to a peace rally regarding the Persian Gulf. For that, only one type of organization can really do the trick fast -- to reach the vaguely antiwar but non-political/barely political mass, you need an organization that canvasses door-to-door for donations and members the way Greenpeace and PIRG do. But they can't just be 'managed' organizations of the type critiqued by Theda Skocpol in DIMINISHED DEMOCRACY. This organization, as ACORN and some other groups do in many urban neighborhoods, must also ORGANIZE members into active chapters, asking each when they become a member if they are willing to be contacted to be organized or whether they only want a subscription.
This kind of coupling of canvassing/mail order (where they don't canvass yet) with chapter organizing (not limited to urban neighborhoods) can bring hundreds of thousands of ACTIVE NEW people from places where the peace movement is now weak into the movement.
EVERY member of Congress should have some members of this group ("PeaceAmerica" or something like that) to pester them. This group, not only opposing the Iraq War but certain other basic issues of militarism (like Star Wars and bunker buster bombs) could develop a mass base in the millions, and could easily finance itself with the canvass money after a minimal initial money investment; indeed, it could be a framework for a sustained movement against militarism and interventionism at the grass roots, something this country really lacks.

There is much more to be said about how issues of demands and militancy should be handled, but that is just an opening idea. Anyone interested can email me.

Second, and also crucial, is to insist at the UN, that the General Assembly, where the US does not have veto power, hold one of its "special sessions" on the war in Iraq. There have been at least a half-dozen over the last 30+ years that I have been involved in politics, and more before that. Then ALL countries would have one vote, and it would be possible to hear from and even establish rudimentary negotiations with some organization POLITICALLY representing the resistance in Iraq. It is important to bring these issues out of the arena of terrorism and repression and into the arena of political demands and political power. (Noam Chomsky has noted many times how the US, being weak in the latter and strong in the realm of force PREFERS the arena of force deciding matters.)

Third, as for Congress, we need a core of really strong pro-peace members of Congress, especially in the House, ones who would oppose the war in Kosovo as well as Iraq, (separating the liberals from the progressives) to form a Peace Caucus. This caucus would be in a position to work with the peace MOVEMENT, and bring its demands to a broader range in Congress. Only this way will there be a SUSTAINED pressure for peace in Congress, linked to a well-organized national peace movement of the kind still lacking today. Then this caucus could work within broader arenae like the proposal mentioned in the BOSTON GLOBE piece today, and keep the fires burning perennially, instead of an item here or there, that doesn't really succeed in cracking the VERY powerful walls of the imperialist state. And that is what we have -- whether you like the buzzword or not -- it's imperialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. They need to develop a strategy:
first demand an exit strategy, then

vote to impeach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
35. I think the only way chimpo will be brought down is if
rethuglicans start abandoning ship en masse.
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
36. Why didn't they oppose it to begin with?
Edited on Sat Jun-11-05 09:57 PM by burrowowl
I don't have their resources to research Bu$h's claims, but knowledge, common sense, paltry research capacity, I figured it out: aluminum tubes BS, bio-warfare truck, over 20,000 sorties many dropping bombs since the end of Gulf War I, etc.
They remind me of an Air Force General at a conference in Mexico over International Air Traffic Control Procedures. The a$$hole didn't know New Mexico was a state? Where in the hell did he think a hugh chunk of the Nukes are stored and where the damn bomb was deveoloped. This was during the SAC era. I'll bet they are just as ignorant now!
The KKKrass ignorance, be it Repukes or Dimbulbs just irks the hell out of me. But I guess better late than never, to show their attonement they should start setting up BU$H AND HIS WHOLE ADMINISTRATION IMPEACHMENT PROCEDURES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
37. Will the good news never end today?!
I am so charged - I wish I could be in DC the 16th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
39. And how many of these smelly congressturds . . .
. . who wanted to support our glorious chimp-master in 2003 happen to be up for re-election in 2006?

Just asking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
42. Today is not soon enough for me and those soldiers I am sure
We must keep the pressure up so they do not back down from this withdraw of our soldiers.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
43. wow
Representative Walter Jones of North Carolina, a conservative Republican who voted to authorize force, said his district is growing weary of a war that has cost the lives of more than 1,600 US troops and left more than 12,000 wounded.
...
Jones said he felt misled by the administration on the reasons for the war because no weapons of mass destruction have been found. ''If I knew what I knew today, I would not have voted for the resolution," Jones said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Wow, that's better than what John Kerry said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC