Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SEVERAL SENATORS MENTIONED AS POSSIBLE SUPREME COURT NOMINEES

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:04 AM
Original message
SEVERAL SENATORS MENTIONED AS POSSIBLE SUPREME COURT NOMINEES
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 12:04 AM by sabra
<<SNIP>>
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?BRD=1994&dept_id=226374&newsid=14680832&PAG=461&rfi=9

SEVERAL SENATORS MENTIONED AS
POSSIBLE SUPREME COURT NOMINEES


ASSOCIATED PRESS June 11, 2005

WASHINGTON (AP) - If there is a Supreme Court vacancy this summer, President Bush may look no farther than the Capitol for a member of Congress who can be confirmed quickly. Past presidents have done it, more than two dozen times.


While admittedly long shots, GOP Sens. Jon Kyl of Arizona and John Cornyn of Texas are being talked up by some conservatives as possible nominees for the high court.

Seen as most likely to step down is Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who at 80 is fighting cancer. Retirement also might be attractive option for Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, 75, and John Paul Stevens, 85.

Kyl is a stalwart pro-business conservative and a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Cornyn is a former Texas Supreme Court justice and state attorney general. Both men have been at the forefront in fighting Democratic filibusters against Bush's federal appeals court nominees.

<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
minnesotaDFLer Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. we need more info
voting records and stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renegade000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. i would rather not
have a politician as a supreme court justice...regardless of ideological leanings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. What about our old "pal" John Ashcroft? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Looks like "We, the People" is about to become "We Inc."
May God's most blessed hedge funds have mercy on us.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. How ironic to consider John Cornyn.
This is the guy who said he "could understand" some people taking out their (violent) frustrations on judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. Well,then it will be alright for someone to go after HIM
if he makes it to the supreme court.After all....he approves violence against judges. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Pure Vomit
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Cornyn is the idiot who said that violence against judges is justified in
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 12:33 AM by BrklynLiberal
some cases.

Senator Links Violence to 'Political' Decisions
'Unaccountable' Judiciary Raises Ire

By Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, April 5, 2005; Page A07


Sen. John Cornyn said yesterday that recent examples of courthouse violence may be linked to public anger over judges who make politically charged decisions without being held accountable.

In a Senate floor speech in which he sharply criticized a recent Supreme Court ruling on the death penalty, Cornyn (R-Tex.) -- a former Texas Supreme Court justice and member of the Judiciary Committee -- said Americans are growing increasingly frustrated by what he describes as activist jurists.

"It causes a lot of people, including me, great distress to see judges use the authority that they have been given to make raw political or ideological decisions," he said. Sometimes, he said, "the Supreme Court has taken on this role as a policymaker rather than an enforcer of political decisions made by elected representatives of the people."

<snip>

more....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26236-2005Apr4.html


If anyone deserves a filibuster, that moron does!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. Is this toon more like Kyl ... or more like Cornyn?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. Be *very* afraid
The name I've heard bumbling around the Net for Chief Justice is a bit scary.

Ted Olson--Intelligent. Highly ideological. Evangelical. Fascistic.
If it's him we have to keep him off the court.

Thinking about him I can still see the face of that mealy-mouthed wife of his on CNN, MS-NBC, and all the other networks smiling while she spewed her dispicable lies. Well, she was on the 757 that crashed into the Pentagon. But remember Ted Olson when he argued for Bush in Bush v. Gore in front of SCOTUS. He is currently solicitor general at Justice and a prime candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Ted Olson is worse than Scalia.
And between Kyl and Cornyn, I can't say which would be worst. They're both equally despicable, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Bolton without the 'stache.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Oh god, flee if Cornyn gets it. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. Cornyn is an Ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. Doesnt matter who it is... HE WILL BE TERRIBLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourStarDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. A senator as pick is a clever move--who would filibuster it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Exactly, the Senate is less likely to fight one of their own!!
Typical sneaky Bush to pick a Senator. But losing Rehnquist to a conservative is not as bad as losing O'Connor or Stevens to a conservative. Then we will have real trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. There won't be a big fight against Renquist's replacement
because he is one of "theirs." If Stevens (seen as a liberal justice) or O'Conner (seen as a moderate) retires, there will be a fight over the replacement because that would "tip the balance" of the court.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. Typical political ploy
but usually they prefer a non name recognition judge. The GOP Senators come on board once several names are actually suggested like this and they have to face they DON'T want one of their own up there but a more circumspect tool. If not me, then no one quells the secret wishes of those with the power to vote.

Of course don't look to the Senate to play hardball with this president who might appoint the Bob Jones legal counsel to Chief Justice out of spite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. Frist in '06
He stands a far better chance of being appointed to something than winning a national election, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat@14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. Despite Conyers voting record in the Senate
I think he may be more dangerous in the Supreme Court.

http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=H1840103
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat@14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. I meant CORNYN....not Conyers. Too late edit - sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. too bad the democrat cowards and appeasers caved on the issue of
nominee filibusters isnt it? the chamberlains of the democrats vs the hitler of the republicans.

must howard dean and john conyers do EVERYTHING?

Msongs
www.msongs.com/political-shirts.htm

PS - the job of the opposition party is to oppose. how can we get a real opposition party in the USA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC