Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Antiwar protesters face federal conspiracy charges (NCR)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:07 PM
Original message
Antiwar protesters face federal conspiracy charges (NCR)
By CLAIRE SCHAEFFER-DUFFY

The U.S. federal government is prosecuting four Catholic peace activists from Ithaca, N.Y., after a state court jury refused to convict them last year for their antiwar protest at a local U.S. military recruiting station. The federal charges made against the activists include “conspiracy to impede an officer of the United States,” a crime punishable by up to six years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

“The federal government is clearly trying to make an example of these people and to intimidate future nonviolent protestors by charging these folks with conspiracy,” said Bill Quigley, a law professor at Loyola University, New Orleans, and an advising attorney for the activists.

On March 17, 2003, in protest of the impending U.S. invasion of Iraq, Danny Burns, Peter DeMott, and sisters Clare and Teresa Grady poured small bottles of their own blood on the walls, floor and an American Flag in the foyer of a military recruiting center in Lansing, N.Y.

Charged with criminal mischief, the activists, who have been dubbed the St. Patrick’s Four, spent four days in jail and in April 2004 were tried at the Tompkins County Courthouse. During their weeklong trial, the defendants, all of whom have children, said they carried out their protest as Catholics and parents who wanted to warn members of the military and potential recruits about the illegality and immorality of the war in Iraq. <snip>

http://ncronline.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2005b/061705/061705p.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's just about vandalism, though.
There are better ways to protest without defacing things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Their own blood
is easy to clean up.
What about Bu$h!?! He can't put the blood back into the dead.
Do read Howard Zinn's: A Peoples' History of the United States.
And if you are caught in a charge of mounted police, how do you defend yourself? As much I as love horses, I know how. Know some people who in the 40's had to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I bet they didn't do $250 worth of damage total. I've known people like ..
.. this: they're ready to give up everything to make a symbolic statement, but they really aren't destructive ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hate my country when i read thing like this.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. And Bush is trusted with the powers of the Patriot Act?
Lock up anyone who disagrees with the politics of Bush? And throw away the key?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. sig heil
welcome to the new reich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Impede" is a rather vague and...
... nebulous term. In the context of this case, advising people not to go into a recruiter's office could be construed as an attempt to impede a recruiter's function. And if two people got together to warn potential recruits, that would be a conspiracy.

I hope this one ends up in the same wastebasket as Ashcroft's attempt to prosecute Greenpeace under the 1872 sailor-mongering law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, watch those NUNS real close during probation ...
we all know the high recidivism rate among those devout Catholics who are called to serve The Lord, i.e., Sisters Clare and Teresa Grady. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC