Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Illegitimate children' of Illinois OK after all

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:44 AM
Original message
'Illegitimate children' of Illinois OK after all
http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-illegit16.html

SPRINGFIELD -- The word "illegitimate" means illegal or wrong, and those words just aren't fair to describe babies born to unmarried parents, as far as Adrienne Kahn of Wilmette sees it.

So she has persuaded Illinois' powers-that-be to stop calling them that.

A measure awaiting Gov. Blagojevich's signature would strike all references to "illegitimate children" in Illinois' laws concerning adoptions, divorces and inheritance, replacing the words with "child born out of wedlock."

"Children being born today have enough to deal with. Why label them?" said Kahn, who admitted she "went a little nuts" when she first realized last summer the term is still used and started calling legislators asking for the change.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. "replacing the words with "child born out of wedlock."--yee Gawds!!
which is worse!! this plays up to the Religious right. my god!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. No kidding.
How about just "children", folks? Eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. 35%-IL state stats--are this children. Yes, just call them kids--what is

the purpose of putting them in a separate category??
The end effect is an exclusionary practice of label--as these are now 'kids at-risk"--just because they have a single mom (? dad). I do not know if these are includeded in the stats (single dads).

.....In 2003, the last year with available statistics, state records show that roughly 35 percent of Illinois newborns were born to single mothers, a figure that's risen steadily over the last five decades.

Past discrimination illegal

Laws in most states allowed for legal discrimination against children with unmarried parents as recently as the mid-1970s, but a series of U.S. Supreme Court decisions have rejected most of those laws on constitutional grounds.

The terminology remained though, and this latest effort is simply catching up, said Sen. John Cullerton (D-Chicago), the bill's lead legislative proponent.

"That's a reflection of sensitivities that have evolved over the years," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Don't we have more important problems to focus on right now?
I'm just saying......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. "There's no good term for an awful situation."--this is why it is importan
--the awful situation is 'single moms"


The terminology remained though, and this latest effort is simply catching up, said Sen. John Cullerton (D-Chicago), the bill's lead legislative proponent.

"That's a reflection of sensitivities that have evolved over the years," he said.

Rep. Chapin Rose (R-Mahomet) initially opposed the measure before finally voting "yes," and dismissed it again Monday as mere political correctness run amok. He also disputed that out-of-wedlock births are "no big deal."

"Call it whatever you want to call it," he said. "There's no good term for an awful situation."
......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. My kid is "illegitimate", and it really makes me angry.
I don't know why we have to label these kids at all--why can't we just call them....I don't know....children??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. 25 years ago, Colorado statute referred to kids
born to unmarried women as "bastards." The law then wouldn't allow the mother to put the father's name on the birth certificate, unless she had a notarized statement from the father that it was okay by him.

Illegitimate would have been a step up . . .

Don't know if the state has bothered to change the wording -- I think they now allow women to name the father (not sure).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. In Mississippi
which has reformed the law mostly, a pregnant woman cannot get a divorce, and the husband is legally the father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC