Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wildlife smuggling only second to drugs on U.S.-Mexico border

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
shockra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 02:55 PM
Original message
Wildlife smuggling only second to drugs on U.S.-Mexico border
Wildlife smuggling only second to drugs on U.S.-Mexico border

Friday, June 24, 2005; Posted: 2:42 p.m. EDT (18:42 GMT)

BROWNSVILLE, Texas (AP) -- When it comes to smuggling animals across the U.S.-Mexico border, U.S. Wildlife Inspector Ed Marshall has seen it all.

Exotic birds given Valium or tequila so they stay quiet through Customs inspections. Sleeves moving with hidden reptiles. Wildcats stashed in trunks. Last week, the Border Patrol seized two white tigers on their way to Mexico.

And in 2001, an African elephant was smuggled across the Gateway International Bridge on a truck. "They call it the 'Dumbo Case,"' Marshall said, shaking his head.

The contraband is part of a global trade in endangered wildlife estimated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at $4.2 billion a year, second only to illegal drugs.

more...

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/06/24/wildlife.smuggling.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where are the Minute Men? We need protecting
from these horrible wild animals. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Slightly misleading headline
Yes, animal smuggling may be second to drugs, but put it in context. Compared to the drug trade, a $4.2 billion wildlife trade is chump change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Part of the point is that they often go together.
http://www.awionline.org/wildlife/aa-trade.htm

Animal-related drug smuggling has a large financial incentive. Dick Smith (former deputy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)), estimates the profitability of wildlife smuggling at $5 billion a year (with many animals being worth more, ounce for ounce, than cocaine) while the World Wildlife Fund places the estimate at $20 billion annually. Combining the two forms of trafficking increases the already huge profits of the multibillion-dollar drug trade. According to Craig van Note, executive vice president of Monitor, an international ecological consortium, "Police agencies around the world are facing the fact that the drug smuggling goes hand-in-hand with wildlife smuggling and vice versa." The USFWS recognizes that smugglers often trade illegal drugs for endangered animals in cashless transfers.

The macabre list of examples of intermingled wildlife/drug smuggling provides a frightening insight into the creative and cruel mind of the smuggler: heroin hidden in snakes, snails, or elephant tusks, cannabis stuffed into antelope heads, cocaine surreptitiously inserted into gutted parrot carcasses, and heroin-filled pouches implanted into the stomachs of large, expensive goldfish. Domestic animals are also used as unsuspecting drug couriers. In December 1994, a debilitated English sheepdog named Cokey arrived from Colombia at New York's John F. Kennedy Airport with ten cocaine-filled balloons surgically implanted into her abdomen.

Two particularly egregious cases highlight how scheming smugglers continually develop innovative ways to use animals to transport drugs. In one case, dubbed Operation Cocaine Constrictor, more than 300 boa constrictors from Colombia were implanted with cocaine-filled condoms inserted into their rectums (which were then sewn shut), causing the deaths of all but 63 of the creatures. It may very well have been the assumption that few wildlife inspectors would want to closely examine a shipment of snakes that lead the smugglers to devise such a cruel ploy.

In 1993, Operation Fishnet focused on a case in which liquid cocaine was carefully mixed into clear outer bags that were placed around inner bags containing valuable tropical fish. The shipments from Colombia were scrutinized only after some leaking bags emitted a strange odor, while others had a curious sediment buildup on the bottom of the bags. Bizarre cases like these point not only to the use of legal wildlife shipments to transport contraband, but also highlight the overwhelming need to increase funding for the Division of Law Enforcement in the USFWS. There is a "Catch-22" in the current inspection system in which the Drug Enforcement Administration has the funds and expertise to pursue drug smugglers but has no reason to inspect wildlife shipments, while the USFWS, with heightened expertise in wildlife inspection, is woefully underfunded and understaffed and cannot possibly inspect all imported shipments, especially in cities like Miami that become hubs for the importation of wildlife and drugs from Central and South America.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Some People are shit
Just leave the freaking animals alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC