Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld Says Defeat of Iraq Insurgency Is Up to Iraq Forces

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:16 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld Says Defeat of Iraq Insurgency Is Up to Iraq Forces
Edited on Sun Jun-26-05 10:17 AM by Kadie

Rumsfeld Says Defeat of Iraq Insurgency Is Up to Iraq Forces

June 26 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said the insurgency in Iraq may continue for years and it will be up to the Iraqis, not U.S. troops, to end it.

``We're not going to win against the insurgency, the Iraqi people will win against the insurgency,'' Rumsfeld said on the ``Fox News Sunday'' program this morning.

He also downplayed a report in the London-based Sunday Times that U.S. officials have met twice this month with several insurgent groups. Such meetings ``go on all the time,'' Rumsfeld said. ``The attention to this is overblown.''

more...
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=aVF.iIMErvVY&refer=us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Does this mean we can leave? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. My exact thoughts.
Trouble is, the Iraqi forces won't be trained in enough size for a very long time. They are being asked to fight against fellow Iraqis and they are also under pressure as they and their families are at risk from attacks because they are members of the Iraqi police or guard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. No no no! It just means if we lose its the Iraqis fault, not ours. We
don't lose wars anymore, not since Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. So the world's first & only HYPER-POWER CAN'T WIN...
but the devastated, bombed, invaded, occupied IRAQIS have to.

Uh huh.

Gee, good thing bush attacked Iraq and liberated everyone. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. We haven't won ONE thing with Bush at the helm of the Titanic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. but but but
we don't negotiate with terraists, right?

NOTE: whenever they say, "it happens all the time" be assured that A) it is an activity that is illegal
B) it is an activity that is immoral
C) it is an activity that is fattening (the wallets of the chimp cronies)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. I pick D) It directly contradicts their public stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. So he thinks American troops aren't doing anything important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is a setup!
When the Iraqis are in full blown civil war, *, Rumsfeld, and the band of cronies will approach the people through the media with a sad face saying that the Iraqi people are clearly not capable of handing things by themselves and require the intervention of the US. Back we go and there we stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. one story in a London paper is overblown attention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. What is he really saying? Does he even know?
"...while the battle against insurgents may continue through the drafting of a new Iraqi constitution later this year and may get more violent, the political progress in Iraq is ``amazing.'"

What's amazing is that we are still in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hangtotheLEFT Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well, Rummy....
THAN WHY THE FUCK DO OUR MEN HAVE TO DIE FOR THE INSURGENCY?!?!?

Enough is goddamn enough already! Could someone (ANYONE!) with 1/2 a fucking brain & 1/2 a fucking conscience please take control of this illegal war & GET US THE FUCK OUTTA' THERE!?!?!?!?

AAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!


.....................................................................
.....................................................................
clinton got head......BUSH KILLS TROOPS DEAD!.....
.....................................................................
.....................................................................
.....................................................................
....My CountryMen Went To The Polls...................
..and All I Got Was THESE LOUSY REPUBLICANS!.....
.....................................................................
......
......
......
......
......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. So in other the words, the US can't defeat the Iraqi resistance
The US with the biggest, most well equipped and well trained armed force on the planet and we can't defeat them. How the hell do we expect the Iraqis to defeat them?

Time for some more 'secret' negotiations maybe?

Can we demand Rummie's resignation yet? His incompetence is astounding.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. that's not in other words, that's a direct quote
"we're not going to win against the insurgency..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. He's on MTP right now. Luntz must have given him new talking points

Now when criticized instead of repeating "9/11, 9/11, 9/11" he keeps trying to insinuate that any criticisim of the White House and Pentagon's poor planning and execution of the war is somehow criticisim of the troops. The troops are like a chainsaw they run and it is up to the operator to make sure they are used properly. He seems to have forgotten this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. updated headline: Rumsfeld Says Iraq Insurgency May Go on for `Years'
`12 Years'

Rumsfeld, who was interviewed on four U.S. television network-news shows, said Iraq may face an extended battle against the insurgents, who he described as a combination of Saddam Hussein loyalists, foreign terrorists and criminals.

``Insurgencies tend to go on five, six, eight, 10, 12 years,'' Rumsfeld said.

The violence may also increase as the transition government in Iraq draws closer to drafting a constitution, he said. While daily attacks continue to claim the lives of U.S. troops, their Iraqi allies and civilians, the political progress in Iraq is ``amazing,'' Rumsfeld said.

One sign of that progress, he said, was the decision of leaders of Iraq's Sunni Muslim factions to take part in the transitional government, which is dominated by Iraq's Shiite majority.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=aoRYFyZciK0M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondie333 Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. It pains me to say it....
Bush 41 was 100% correct when he stood his ground on not going into Baghdad. The man knew it would be a losing situation. As usual with most sons and their dads, they don't listen. Have to learn for himself that daddy was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. Must have said this during one of those rare times he is sober.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. Hmmmm.
So, let's see. Iraq was a stable -- if hostile to us -- country in the Middle East in 2002. But Lil Georgie couldn't resist whacking the scorpion in the terrarium, and broke it into pieces. Now it turns out that the scorpion in the terrarium was keeping a whole host of other little uglies in check. Not only is the scorpion gone, but the terrarium has been smashed and the little uglies are getting to be big uglies.

Time to walk away and say it's all someone else's problem, and whine that it's wrong to hold this corrupt administration responsible for the mess it's made.

I'd find this logic deficient from a four-year-old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. What Iraqi forces?
"We don't want to take responsibility; we don't want it," said Amar Mana, 27, an Iraqi private whose forehead was grazed by a bullet during an insurgent attack in November. "Here, no way. The way the situation is, we wouldn't be ready to take responsibility for a thousand years."

From:
Building Iraq's Army: Mission Improbable
Project in North Reveals Deep Divide Between U.S. and Iraqi Forces

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/09/AR2005060902245.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. Adults take responibility. they do not shift blame. Grow up
Rummy. You went into this war with no plan to win the peace. You fucked up. You are responsible, and so are the others who took part in the neo con echo chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. These criminals will never take responsiblity -- never!
They will lie, cheat, steal, criticize, and blame others but will never admit that they were wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. We will have to force them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radar Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. And that will be possible...
Edited on Sun Jun-26-05 12:40 PM by radar
When Iraqi Forces accept the foreigners(neocons in republican clothing) living thousands of miles away as the master and dominant partner in this relationship. Much like many democratic congressmen & all corporate media the last 5 years - willing to take any scraps thrown their way as payment for acting submissive.

* I don't think the Iraqis are that weak, though. The armchair warriors in Washington are finding that not all bow down before the bully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dejaboutique Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. that was the part that struck me
when he was talking about it being up to the iraq force but how can he deny the staggering numbers of iraqi police and guard being killed everyday, they seem to lose about an average of 5-10 a day! Rummy, iraq won't have any iraqi police or army if they keep getting blown up on a daily basis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. why should we listen to Rummy? He hasn't been right, yet!
Everything this idiot has done regarding this "war" has been wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. What this means, in plain English,
is that the US has failed. If their plans had succeeded, we would be setting up stores in Baghdad, the US embassy would be built, and the oil would be flowing. The entire country of Iraq was carved up for bidders; stores, construction companies, real estate, you name it. The ink was signed on the dotted line.

Instead, we have the US shifting to "Plan B". This is a very clear sign that our original plans have been scrapped. And I believe they secretly know that they won't be able to train the Iraqis themselves to squash the rebellion. Iraq is very clannish, they have ties which go back centures, and no American plans will change that.

I think at this point, the Pentagon is just treading water, trying to figure out what to do next. There is no doubt in my mind that they realize they've failed. The Iraqis will outlast us: they have all the ammunition they need: notice, almost all the attacks are now bomb-related.

And if you think about it, RumsFool has been pretty consistent in this. He's said many times we won't be able to root out the insurgency. CHENEY is the one who absolutely will not see reality for what it is. Bush, being the perennial ass-kisser, goes along with what his boss, Big Dick, says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. sounds like Vietnamization redux to me...
didn't work then, won't work now.

how long before the putty-brained dumbass constituency supporting these war criminals will get it? oh that's right, never.

some people deserve to be flayed to death by garden snails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Logic Disconnect.
If a part of the Insurgency is fighting to oust the U.S. Occupation how can the Bush Regime keep telling us that the Iraqis must deal with the Insurgency. By trying to cast the Insurgency as one force the Bush Regime is attempting to make the situation simple for simple minds.

Unfortunately it is not simple. Iraq does not yet have an actual sovereign Govt. for the Iraqis to defend. While a majority of Sunnis are not represented this Iraqi Govt. does not represent all of the people of Iraq. The Insugency is many groups with different goals. That's too complicated to explain to the Amerikan people, so the Bush Regime casts the entire Insurgency as "killers", terrorists, rebels, militants that are against Freedom. Ah... much simpler.

Rumsfailed is a screw up that Shrub cannot fire because it would send the message that the Bush Regime screwed up the Iraq aftermath. They don't admit failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. The ARVN, uh excuse me, Iraqi army will handle the bulk
of the fighting and the reduced forces of the U.S. military will remain in the country to "assist and advise."

Sure thing Rummy; it worked so well last time. Are we bombing Iranbodia yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC