http://www.thecaribbeancamera.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=54&Itemid=2Thursday, 13 January 2005
The following interview with Bernard Coard, former deputy Prime Minister of Grenada’s People’s Revolutionary Government (PRG) was conducted by Grenadian Journalist Leroy Noel for The Camera.
Coard is one of the 17 persons convicted for the death of Prime Minister Maurice Bishop and several of his cabinet colleagues that led to the US invasion of the island in 1983.
The trial of Coard and 16 of his colleagues -- known as the Grenada 17 -- raised eyebrows across the world, and even Amnesty International slammed it as a travesty.
The Grenada 17 are now awaiting a judicial decision that could result in them being freed from prison after 21 years.
Q: When Hurricane Ivan hit Grenada, on September 7th last, the walls of the prison in three locations, including in your section, collapsed, and the vast majority of prisoners fled, why didn’t you and the other members of the Grenada Seventeen?
A: Because it would have been highly irresponsible for us to do so, especially given who we were and are.
Q: But at that moment and for several days to come, there was no functioning government in Grenada, any functioning police force, and so on. Some prisoners fled to St. Vincent, some to Trinidad, and a few went as far as Venezuela. Some of these are yet to be located. Why didn’t you?
A: Only the guilty flee. Our position, from day one, is that we will stay and fight through the courts, for our freedom.
Q: Journalists from several regional and international media organizations interviewed you inside the prison on several of the days immediately following Ivan. They reported you as saying that you did not want nor would you accept freedom granted by the government of Grenada. Did you really say this?
A: Yes.
Q: But if the government of Grenada were to offer you your freedom immediately, why, after twenty-one years wouldn’t you grasp it with both hands and leave the prison there and then?
A: We wish no favours from this or any other government of Grenada in the future. We have been illegally detained for twenty-one years. We are legally entitled to our freedom. We want it not from some government seeking to dispense ‘charity’ or ‘mercy’ – or gain political credit – but from a Court of Law based on the requirements of Grenada’s laws and constitution. It is more than time for the lawlessness with which our case has been handled over the last two decades to be brought to an end.
Q: But weren’t you convicted in Courts of Law, and these convictions upheld in the Court of Appeal?
A: The October 2003 Report of Amnesty International explains, in some detail, the kind of “trial” and “Appeal” which we received in those days. Judges in all countries of the world that I know about are paid by the month, to hear all cases which come before them. This was true even in Apartheid South Africa and Augusto Pinochet’s Chile. When, however, judges are paid – as in our case – just to hear one case, and when each is paid one million – yes, one million – Eastern Caribbean dollars just to hear that one case, you need to ask yourself why. When, on top of this, they demand an additional US $650, 000 to deliver their judgement, you need to do more than simply ask why. If you wish, I can send you the documentary proof regarding these payments, not only from official Grenada government and Parliamentary records, but also from Declassified (Secret) US government documents, released by the US government as a result of a US Federal Court Order under the Freedom Of Information Act.
Q: Why was there a need to put you people through a “Kangaroo” process – to use your term? Why wasn’t your case handled the same as anybody else’s?
A: If you have evidence to convict someone, there is no need to sack the established Court Registrar and dismiss the jury array he selected, and instead take one of the prosecution’s team of lawyers in the very said case and make her the temporary Registrar, and have her then choose a new array of jurors from which the final twelve would be chosen. There would be no need for eleven (11) of the twelve (12) jurors finally selected (and who brought in verdicts of “guilty”) to have been people not legally eligible to be jurors at all, under the jury ordinance! There would also be no need to pass nine (9) – yes, nine – laws (including three new jury laws) wholly or partially aimed at rigging the conditions under which our trial and appeal process would be undertaken. There would also be no need to torture us, and manufacture evidence in the form of perjured testimony fromfour witnesses. And, finally, as mentioned already, there would be no need to make millionaires of the judges who conducted our case! Kangaroo trials, by their very nature, therefore, are reserved for the trial of political opponents – and those whom you know you have no evidence against; who, therefore, would be found not guilty, if tried in accordance with the law.
Q: But I am still not clear as to why the United States government, as well as all the then governments of the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) should have found it necessary to have put the seventeen of you through a process which Amnesty International referred to as ‘manifestly unfair’, and failing to meet internationally acceptable standards. Why was this necessary, do you think?
A: You have to realize that we were tried, convicted, and imprisoned during the final years of the Cold War. United States troops invaded our country; something condemned by the United Nations by a vote of 109 to 2 (or figures close to these). They had to find a way to justify this invasion. They spent US $18 million in propaganda alone, within the Caribbean region including Grenada, demonizing us; and several more millions paying for the “trial process” through which we were put. We were tried three years before the Berlin Wall fell; before the collapse of the Eastern Europe regimes allied to the Soviet Union; and five years before the final collapse of the Soviet Union itself! Indeed, the Preliminary Inquiry before a Magistrate, in our case, took place before Mikhail Gorbachev became leader of the Soviet Union! United States troops were still doing military maneuvers in Grenada while our “trial” was taking place; even flying helicopter gun ships over the court house itself while the proceedings were ongoing. This is why Amnesty International suggests, through the title of its Report on our “Trial” and “Appeal”, that we were The Last of the Cold War Prisoners.
Q: Do you feel any bitterness or hostility towards the United States as a result of their role in all that’s happened to you?
A: Why should I? I just said, this all occurred during – and as part of – the raging, final decade of the Cold War. It must be seen in that context and with that perspective.
more...