Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean Leads Among Possible Internet Voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:04 PM
Original message
Dean Leads Among Possible Internet Voters
Dean Leads Among Possible Internet Voters
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: October 10, 2003


Filed at 5:33 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Howard Dean is clearly on to something with the Internet. A poll of Michigan Democrats found Dean, who has attracted thousands of supporters and millions of dollars through the Internet, led his presidential rivals by 11 percent among voters who would prefer to vote on the Internet in the Feb. 7 caucuses.

But among those who would rather vote in person or by mail, the former Vermont governor is tied for the lead, according to the Epic-MRA poll released Friday.

Michigan plans to allow Internet voting in its caucuses, a policy that has drawn criticism from all the presidential candidates except Dean and Wesley Clark. Several Michigan Democrats have filed a protest, arguing that the policy will put minority voters and low-income voters at a disadvantage. The challenge is pending.

Overall, the poll showed Dean with 21 percent support, Clark at 15 percent, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts at 13 percent and Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut at 12 percent. The remaining candidates were in the low single digits; 12 percent were undecided.

more.............

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Michigan-Poll.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why would internet voting put minorities at a disadvantage?
Because it takes less effort? That's the only reason I can think of, since it's still one person, one vote (well, theoretically). I like the idea, but not if it is truly discriminatory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Because Blacks, Latinos and the Working-Class Have Less Access to the Net
Edited on Fri Oct-10-03 05:21 PM by DoveTurnedHawk
The digital divide is very real. This plan disenfranchises some of our most loyal constituents by making it more difficult, relatively speaking, to vote than more affluent -- and often white -- folks.

I'm actually a bit disappointed in Clark for not opposing this.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Do You Know For Certain Clark Opposes It?
Because these positions were inferred from the fact that Clark didn't sign a petition 2 weeks after joining the race.

How do we know that Clark, himself, even saw the petition?

How many petitions and interviews etc. was in front of Clark 2 weeks into announcing his bid?

Has anyone asked him to state his position plainly?

Maybe he IS for Internet voting.....

But it'd be nice to base our discussions on what the Candidate has actually SAID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. That's a Fair Statement (eom)
DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't know, but as long as everyone is allowed to vote, whether by
Edited on Fri Oct-10-03 05:25 PM by Larkspur
going to the polls or by online, minoroities would be able to exercise their right to vote.

The only disadvantage to minorities would be that those who have computers, and many minorities don't have computers, would be able to vote from the comfort of their home; whereas, those who don't have computers would have to make the effort to leave their homes to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly, and That Is a Big Disadvantage
For anyone who has had to wait in line to vote, you know what I'm talking about.

The lowering of barriers to entry for the affluent is the same as raising them for the non-affluent. It results in a skewed tally, and advances the notion of government by and for the rich.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Absentee/ voting by mail is a choice
How is this different?

And wouldn't lines be shorter if some were voting from home by mail or computer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Absentee Voting Is Not Really Discriminatory
Edited on Fri Oct-10-03 06:46 PM by DoveTurnedHawk
Although it is still underutilized among communities of color and poorer communities due to lack of education efforts.

In any event, absentee voting is not really discriminatory, because you only need an address, which you also need in order to be registered in the first place. That is a far cry from requiring a computer with Internet access readily available to you.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SadEagle Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Aieeeee...
Internet voting is worse then unauditable touchscreens --- there is no such thing as a secure networked computer. Not to mention it makes intimidating people to vote a certain way possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldilox369 Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. you know...
Personally, i wish they would just mail out a ballot to everyone's mailbox and then have them return it. No lines. i know this would be a great waste of paper, oh never mind, there are too many problems associated with this: Fraud, anthrax, cheating, lost in transit. i guess that's why we don't do it. *sigh* but really, don't you think if they did it right, there could be a way to vote online? does anyone have ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Didn't Oregon Just Try Voting By Mail? (eom)
DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhereIsMyFreedom Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Online voting is feasible
and would be just as secure as voting through the mail. Anthrax, obviously, wouldn't be a concern online, but there would be others like DOS attacks to prevent people from getting their votes in.

In terms of excluding poor people from participating, they could easily vote by mail from the comfort of their own homes, so I'm not convinced that this is a real concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It May Not Be a Concern for You
But procedural due process is a big deal, and so long as this system is slanted so significantly in favor of the affluent, it's an issue.

It's not enough to say, "Oh, well those poor people could just vote in person or by mail." The fact is, it's a pain in the ass to go line up. It's a pain in the ass (although less so) to request your ballot by the deadline and send it back via mail.

It's not right to make things easier for the affluent to vote, while working-class communities and communities of color still have to do it the hard way.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catforclark2004 Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. this is the more in the article.....
Wesley Clark and Howard Dean fare well when matched against Democratic rivals in national and state polls, respectively, but they face an uphill fight against President Bush.

Bush easily outdistanced Dean, 50 percent to 32 percent, in a poll conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs for the Cook Political Report and released Friday. Bush bested Clark, 48 percent to 33 percent.

Dean, the former Vermont governor, is tied for the lead among Democrats in Iowa polls and leads in New Hampshire surveys. Clark holds a slight lead over his Democratic foes in national polls.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yep! Looks like Dean does almost as well as Clark against Bush.
Edited on Fri Oct-10-03 10:19 PM by unfrigginreal
And considering that Clark has higher national name recognition due to his stint on CNN, then Dean is looking pretty good and will improve as more voters come to know about him.

Another poll done by Quinnipiac for Connecticut also shows Dean and Clark to be similar in a matchup against Bush.

President Bush had a narrow 47 -- 44 percent lead over Sen. Lieberman in a July 31 poll by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University. Bush's approval was 54 -- 41 percent in that poll. Running Bush against other Democrats shows:

•Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry edges Bush 48 -- 44 percent;
•Former Gen. Wesley Clark gets 44 percent to Bush's 46 percent, a tie;
•New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, Missouri Congressman Richard Gephardt and former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean each get 45 percent to Bush's 47 percent.


http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x8465.xml



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. It only gets better from here against Bush,
unless he starts another war, or Israel starts one for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC