Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Offer Three Names For O'Connor Vacancy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:38 AM
Original message
Democrats Offer Three Names For O'Connor Vacancy
From the Washington Post

Democrats offered the names of three Hispanic federal judges and suggested that they could win broad Senate support. The three are Sonia Sotomayor of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, who was named a district judge by President George H.W. Bush and elevated to the appeals court by Clinton; Edward Charles Prado of the 5th Circuit, nominated to be a district judge by Reagan and named to the appeals court by President George W. Bush; and U.S. District Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa of McAllen, Tex., nominated by Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zara Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Notice they are all hispanic.
my guess is this is "chess". when bush nominates a hispanic, some democrats will oppose, even if privately they are glad (i.e. alberto gonzales). orrin hatch, et. al. will again charge democratic racism versus . So the democrats are guessing that bush will nominate gonzales or some other hispanic, and because of abortion and special interest politics, the dems will need to offer up a fight, and so they are inoculating themselves versus charges of racism. None of those named above is on anyone's short list of who will get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sonia Sotomayor
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 10:46 AM by ck4829
She is a Moderate and she does not seem to be a one issue fanatic.

The Democrats need to also say "This is OUR choice too".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think that's a wonderful choice.
Approved by both Bush Sr. and Clinton. Female and hispanic. What could be more of a uniting choice?

Of course, Chimpy won't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djg21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Sotomayer is a non-starter.
She is a relatively "liberal" judge on one of the most "liberal" appellate courts in the Country, and she's from New York -- a BLUE state. Great jurist, but it will never happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. agreed
The Democrats need to go out and campaign for these three choices as not only deserving, but as ones who would get broad support from Democrats AND Republicans. (And if they have other names to float, now is the time to do so.)

It's imperative that Reid, Leahy, Dean and other party leaders try to hit the Sunday talk show circuit, make themselves available for interviews with the MSM, and keep these names in the news.

Otherwise, by the time September rolls around, the conservative noise machine will not only be spinning for a Bush pick, but also suggest that the Dems were of no help during the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plausible Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why not nominiate
Hillary Clinton?
They can tell the rightwingnuts that this way she can't get the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaway Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. i think Zara nailed this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Actually, that is where she should go
Once there, no longer beholden to getting elected, she could stop being a center Right Republican.

AND, freeper heads will explode the world over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. I'd be happy to see her on the court, but
I think we could pretty much expect rioting in the streets in all red states and parts of some blue ones...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Awesome pre-emptive strike!!!
Way to get out in front with some "ethnic" nominees who are moderates and have close ties to Republicans. This way the Repukes cannot play their same old game of saying, "We wonder if they didn't like Thomas because he is an African American". Utter BS, and I don't think anyone falls for it, but they try it every time.

Great work!

david
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. What a group. Let the repukes figure out a way to dis this group
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Has the entire federal judiciary been nominated by republicans?
It sure seems that way.

Here is partly how Reagan set the stage for terminating democracy in America:

Why Many Think that Ronald Reagan's Court Appointments May Have Been His Chief Legacy
By David M. O'Brien

The Reagan administration, in the words of Stephen Markman, put "in place what is probably the most thorough and comprehensive system for recruiting and screening federal judicial candidates of any administration ever. This administration has, moreover, attempted to assert the President's prerogatives over judicial selection more consistently than many of its predecessors."

From the outset, it was clear that greater presidential control over judicial selection was necessary if the department was to reverse what it perceived as a trend toward appointing liberal to moderate judges. One of the first steps was the elimination of Carter's nominating commissions for appellate court judges. Moreover, Reagan also requested senators to submit three to five or more names for each district court vacancy in their home states. This gave the administration more flexibility and bargaining power over the nomination of lower federal court judges.
snip---
A White House Judicial Selection Committee was created to decide whom the president should nominate. It met weekly in the White House and included the attorney general; the deputy attorney general; the counselor to the president; and the assistant attorneys general for the Office of Legal Policy, personnel and legislative affairs; as well as other White House advisers, including the chief of staff.
snip----
Notably. in the case of Manion and a few other controversial judicial nominations, President Reagan made personal phone calls to pivotal senators that paid off and underscored his commitment to reforming the federal judiciary through his judicial appointments.

http://hnn.us/articles/10968.html

Reagan was a very, very evil man, a troll servant of the global financial powers, who sold out our country because of his overwhelming need to get his smiling face on TV 24/7.

He was in no wayclever enough to plan, or even to consider, these judicial manipulations on his own. Really shitty people with lots of money and power to gain used Reagan as a figurehead to build the foundation of our current fledgling fascist state that once was the a free democratic USA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. "Really shitty people with lots of money and power..."
Read as "Bushco."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edgewater_Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. Here's Where We'll See How Much Smack Rove Still Has
Because you can bet your ass he'll be wantin' to assert that he still has the biggest cock in all of DC -- and that may mean giving us a Janice Rogers Brown, a Roy Moore, or my personal favorite darkhorse, one John Ashcroft, for the O'Connor seat. Just to show everyone who's boss.

I'm waitin'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC