Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Transcript:Press Briefing by Scott McClellan (?'s Rove/Treasongate Day 3!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:58 PM
Original message
Transcript:Press Briefing by Scott McClellan (?'s Rove/Treasongate Day 3!)
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 02:01 PM by truthpusher
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/07/20050713-7.html

Press Briefing by Scott McClellan
----------------------
James S. Brady Briefing Room
----------------------
12:44 P.M. EDT
----------------------
(snip)

And with that, I'm glad to go to your questions.

Q Scott, some White House advisors expressed surprise that the President didn't -- did not give a warm endorsement to Karl Rove when he was asked about him at the Cabinet meeting. They had expected that he would speak up. Can you explain why the President didn't give a -- express confidence?

MR. McCLELLAN: Sure. He wasn't asked about his support or confidence for Karl. As I indicated yesterday, every person who works here at the White House, including Karl Rove, has the confidence of the President. This was not a question that came up in the Cabinet Room.

Q Well, the President has never been restrained at staying right in the lines of a question, as you know. (Laughter.) He kind of -- he says whatever he wants. And if he had wanted to express confidence in Karl Rove, he could have. Why didn't he?

MR. McCLELLAN: He expressed it yesterday through me, and I just expressed it again.

Q Well, why doesn't he?

MR. McCLELLAN: He was not asked that specific question, Terry. You know that very well. The questions he were asked -- he was asked about were relating to an ongoing investigation.

Q But, Scott, he defended Al Gonzales without even being asked --

and lots, lots more.....complete transcript: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/07/20050713-7.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh this one is great..
Q Scott, you know what, to make a general observation here, in a previous administration, if a press secretary had given the sort of answers you've just given in referring to the fact that everybody who works here enjoys the confidence of the President, Republicans would have hammered them as having a kind of legalistic and sleazy defense. I mean, the reality is that you're parsing words, and you've been doing it for a few days now. So does the President think Karl Rove did something wrong, or doesn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. David Gregory Rocks
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 02:06 PM by Oreo
Q Scott, you know what, to make a general observation here, in a previous administration, if a press secretary had given the sort of answers you've just given in referring to the fact that everybody who works here enjoys the confidence of the President, Republicans would have hammered them as having a kind of legalistic and sleazy defense. I mean, the reality is that you're parsing words, and you've been doing it for a few days now. So does the President think Karl Rove did something wrong, or doesn't he?

MR. McCLELLAN: No, David, I'm not at all. I told you and the President told you earlier today that we don't want to prejudge the outcome of an ongoing investigation. And I think we've been round and round on this for two days now.

Q Even if it wasn't a crime? You know, there are those who believe that even if Karl Rove was trying to debunk bogus information, as Ken Mehlman suggested yesterday -- perhaps speaking on behalf of the White House -- that when you're dealing with a covert operative, that a senior official of the government should be darn well sure that that person is not undercover, is not covert, before speaking about them in any way, shape, or form. Does the President agree with that or not?

MR. McCLELLAN: Again, we've been round and round on this for a couple of days now. I don't have anything to add to what I've said the previous two days.

Q That's a different question, and it's not round and round --

MR. McCLELLAN: You heard from the President earlier.

Q It has nothing to do with the investigation, Scott, and you know it.

MR. McCLELLAN: You heard from the President earlier today, and the President said he's not --

Q That's a dodge to my question. It has nothing to do with the investigation. Is it appropriate for a senior official to speak about a covert agent in any way, shape, or form without first finding out whether that person is working as a covert officer.

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, first of all, you're wrong. This is all relating to questions about an ongoing investigation, and I've been through this.

Q If I wanted to ask you about an ongoing investigation, I would ask you about the statute, and I'm not doing that.

MR. McCLELLAN: I think we've exhausted discussion on this the last couple of days.

Q You haven't even scratched the surface.

Q It hasn't started.

MR. McCLELLAN: I look forward to talking about it once the investigation is complete, as the President does, as well. And you heard from the President earlier today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wish I had gotten to see this
Q Scott, from Africa, Mrs. Bush says, Karl Rove is a very good friend of mine; I've known him for years. And she's not going to speculate on any other part of the case. Well, does the President feel the same way about Karl Rove, the relationship with Karl Rove, a very good friend for many years?

MR. McCLELLAN: Yes, he does.

Q And at this point, is it ebbing or flowing? Is that relationship with the President ebbing or flowing? (Laughter.)

MR. McCLELLAN: Again, this is a creative way to come out to the same kind of questions.

Q You're right, it is, and I want an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. They are still pounding him
GOOD!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. but note his complete avoidness now of even the questions...
I think they need to keep hammering him, and not let him get away with forcing them to ask about other topics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orion The Hunter Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. RE: Hehehe
That's right Scott...you just keep trying to bob and weave and the Press will just keep treating you like a piñata! Does the White House think these questions are just going to go away...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. in short. yes, they do.
it's what they think, and what they fervently fucking pray for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here's a great one in which reporter has to answer her own question.
Q I'm sorry, I wasn't here yesterday, so could you refresh my memory? Was there an ongoing investigation --

MR. McCLELLAN: The briefings are available online.

Q -- at the time that you answered previous questions on this issue?

MR. McCLELLAN: Again, I responded to those questions the past couple of days. Go ahead.

Q The answer is, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonofor prez Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Please note the hypocrisy
I love it that someone has finally brought out that the re-pugs would have been outraged if a Democratic Administration did this. Could it be that the lies are finally going to wither in the light of day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Ha! That was really loud today.
And the press was just laughing about it - it was so obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Welcome to DU, bonoforprez!
Good first post. Keep 'em coming.

Yes, they got sooo much mileage parsing Clinton. They wouldn't let it go, like rabid dogs. Now Scotty is getting a tiny taste of that medicine.

Bush the plainspoken has given way to Bush the parser, and Scotty is making it abundantly clear that Rove is hiding under legalistic language and technicalities, and I just hope it keeps on coming. The MSM is even showing it on the news (some of them, anyways). The people are seeing these jackasses for what they are - bullies, punks, and traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JusticeForAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Welcome to DU!!
:toast: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. The transcript edited the last Q.
KARL ROVE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. HIS OWN ATTORNEY!
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 02:48 PM by A-Schwarzenegger
Bush is in this up to his empty forehead.
Whether Rove quits or gets fired (or neither)
will likely be based on how it will protect Bush from or make him more
vulnerable to the law, as well as to the people's perception
of Bush's guilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Scotty dodging questions reminds me of my 3-year-old nephew...
Right after the briefing my nephew decided he didn't want to put on his diaper. Every time I said "diaper", he pointed to something else and wanted to play with that instead. His owl, his frog, a scented candle he carries around, his Matchbox car...anything except the diaper. Seems a lot like Scotty choosing any reporter except those that wanted to ask about Rove's treason.

In the end, my nephew put on his diaper, and Scotty will have to answer these questions. The only question is whether it is from the podium in the White House briefing room or in front of a Grand Jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. "He was not asked that specific question"
Well, we all know this admin only sees in black-and-white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. And Liar Boy went RIGHT to Goyal to get away from the badgering!
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 04:17 PM by Roland99
:rofl:



And this passage:

Q The Washington Times editorial page this morning published a cartoon comparing White House correspondents to sharks. My question, do you think that they were wrong to make this comparison? (Laughter.)

Q Go ahead, Scott, let her rip.

MR. McCLELLAN: I have a picture up in my office that everybody can look at.

Q We'll allow you to comment.

MR. McCLELLAN: Go ahead, Olivier.

Q Two quick ones on Iran --

MR. McCLELLAN: It may not look like it, but there's a little flesh that's been taken out of me the past few days. (Laughter.)

Q Where?

MR. McCLELLAN: Like I said, it may not look like it. (Laughter.) I can assure you that it has been.



The press is having a field day! It's like they're on summer vacation and they're letting loose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. Reporters with spine ?
Bout damn time

Q Even if it wasn't a crime? You know, there are those who believe that even if Karl Rove was trying to debunk bogus information, as Ken Mehlman suggested yesterday -- perhaps speaking on behalf of the White House -- that when you're dealing with a covert operative, that a senior official of the government should be darn well sure that that person is not undercover, is not covert, before speaking about them in any way, shape, or form. Does the President agree with that or not?

MR. McCLELLAN: Again, we've been round and round on this for a couple of days now. I don't have anything to add to what I've said the previous two days.

Q That's a different question, and it's not round and round --

MR. McCLELLAN: You heard from the President earlier.

Q It has nothing to do with the investigation, Scott, and you know it.

MR. McCLELLAN: You heard from the President earlier today, and the President said he's not --

Q That's a dodge to my question. It has nothing to do with the investigation. Is it appropriate for a senior official to speak about a covert agent in any way, shape, or form without first finding out whether that person is working as a covert officer.

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, first of all, you're wrong. This is all relating to questions about an ongoing investigation, and I've been through this.

Q If I wanted to ask you about an ongoing investigation, I would ask you about the statute, and I'm not doing that.

MR. McCLELLAN: I think we've exhausted discussion on this the last couple of days.

Q You haven't even scratched the surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC