Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Uneasy bedfellows in investigation of CIA leak

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 07:56 AM
Original message
Uneasy bedfellows in investigation of CIA leak
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/10/12/MN115224.DTL

Washington -- The first real political scandal of the Bush administration appears to have legs, to the discomfort of an unusually large number of people in Washington --

both in the White House and the press corps.

The White House is facing accusations that two of its officials outed a CIA agent, endangering national security and possibly committing a criminal act, to punish a critic of the administration's policy on Iraq.

<snip>

But some experts believe that government investigators will get to the bottom of the story -- in part because the nation's intelligence and defense establishments have been deeply angered by the exposure of one of their own.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good article!
Thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is the "hunt" we aren't on?
We're on the "hunt" for Osama and Saddam and wmds, but this one's WAY tougher???

snip>
"I have no idea whether we'll find out who the leaker is partially because, in all due respect to your profession, you do a very good job of protecting the leakers," Bush told reporters.
end snip>

Here, Rove seems to try to make lemonade. It's the journalists fault, and oh btw, we TOLD you that secretive was good. Haven't we always hated leakers, especially when they were Dems who we had to polygraph? :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markbark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. You'd Think Poppy Would've Clued Him In
on this one....

Dubya's about to learn very painful and expensive lessons:

1. The intelligience community existed long before the current admininstration. They will remain long after the BushII junta is a dim and distant memory.

2. They take care of their own and do not suffer fools gladly.

3. They rarely forgive and NEVER forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. There's a quote around where Poppy said this is traitorous
Only traitors leak out the identiy of CIA agents is what Poppy said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. you mean
this quote:

We need more human intelligence. That means we need more protection for the methods we use to gather intelligence and more protection for our sources, particularly our human sources, people that are risking their lives for their country. Even though I'm a tranquil guy now at this stage of my life, I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, the most insidious, of traitors.~~George H.W. Bush, April 16, 1999, Dedication Speech, George Bush Center for Intelligence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Poppy link to that statement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Novak the righteous
Edited on Sun Oct-12-03 09:05 AM by Woodstock
"There is a code in this -- the business I'm in and have made my life's work, that you do not reveal confidential sources,"

Oh, so that code is more important than this one:

Plame's career as a clandestine operator was ruined, and the CIA front company she and other CIA agents used as cover was exposed. Intelligence officials have expressed concern that as a result of the leak, U.S. enemies would be able to track down the foreign agents Plame had recruited over years of painstaking work. {and this likely means death for them! - insert mine}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. the business he is in?
he's a f***ing republican tool hiding under the guise of a journalist. Traitorous bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFF BrandyWine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Unfortunately Novak is protected on this one, Woodstock...
Edited on Sun Oct-12-03 04:10 PM by EFF BrandyWine
if a reporter does not protect a source, soon there would be no sources to protect. Note please that the other reporters that were called have not revealed the name of the caller/callers. Since they did not run with the story it would seem they could (behind closed doors) give up the source. Apparently no one has asked them thus far.

The entire episode is dreadful and truly borders on treason IMO...this lady was connected to a lot of people that might now be in danger. Loss of life is also a possibility...let us hope that is not the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E_Zapata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. oh, I think the CIA can get those 'journalists' to reveal their sources.
oh yes I do.

First up? Novak. Sweet justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. the "first real political scandal of the Bush administration"
PLEASE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Indeed...
We should be incredulous at this claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC