Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Karl Rove's alibi hidden from FBI

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:36 PM
Original message
Karl Rove's alibi hidden from FBI
(Mods, I did not see this posted, feel free to lock if it has)

http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=10016

By Murray Waas
Web Exclusive: 07.19.05

Print Friendly | Email Article

White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove did not disclose that he had ever discussed CIA officer Valerie Plame with Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper during Rove’s first interview with the FBI, according to legal sources with firsthand knowledge of the matter.

The omission by Rove created doubt for federal investigators, almost from the inception of their criminal probe into who leaked Plame's name to columnist Robert Novak, as to whether Rove was withholding crucial information from them, and perhaps even misleading or lying to them, the sources said.

Also leading to the early skepticism of Rove's accounts was the claim that although he first heard that Plame worked for the CIA from a journalist, he said could not recall the name of the journalist. Later, the sources said, Rove wavered even further, saying he was not sure at all where he first heard the information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was posted in GD, but I don't think cross-posting in LBN is a crime
kicked an nominated. Critical.

Did Rove pull a Martha, on top of everything else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Goddess I hope so!
I'll take any conviction. Perjury or lying to the FBI are both fine with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GardeningGal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Seems like it could also be
obstruction of justice based on the first interview. At least the way I read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. that works too
I want to see them go down. Please Goddess let them go down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the link!
Interesting reading, seems Rove wouldn't know how to tell the truth if his freedom depended on it, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Stick a fork in him--
but stand back while you do it. You don't want to get splashed with any of the poisonous green goo that oozes through his veins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. If this case was turned down by the Supreme Court can it go back up?
I hope it can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Answer: No.
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 09:52 PM by Seabiscuit
Most cases are decided by the SCOTUS by a decision not to hear the case ("turning it down").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Its hard for me to believe he could of been that stupid.
Honestly, much as he is a poisonous amoral snail he is not dumb. Bigger and better have fallen because of pride and tripping over their enlarged ego, I'll keep my fingers crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Ahhhhh, our old friend "HUBRIS"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. He has lived his lies for so long he's bound to die by them someday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. There are people out there that believe their lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Yes - Jean Paul Sartre called it "bad faith". According to his writings,
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 11:06 PM by Seabiscuit
people who lie often enough begin to believe their own lies.

And eventually, people like Rove begin telling really stupid lies, because their lies become their reality, and they lose all perspective on the real world outside of their webs of deceit. Part of their delusion is the misperception that the rest of the world sees everything just the way they see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Not dumb but enormously arrogant and spiteful and vindictive as hell.
Those traits will be his downfall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. I'm a "student" of..
... human nature. It is my belief that when people do things that are "wrong" over a period of time and keep getting away with it, they get sloppy.

And when someone tells a lot of lies it gets very hard, even for really really REALLY smart people to keep it all straight in their heads. They eventually forget a lie they told to a certain person and reveal themselves.

I don't doubt that Rove is an very intelligent man. But it is totally consistent with human nature that he eventually would cross the line, after all if you keep pushing the envelope and nothing happens, eventually you push it too far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. Rove is the mastermind of the 'STUPID playing stupid' tactic
what the hell else did any of us expect him to say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Karl Rove is slime on his own shoes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. And Paul Wolfowitz is slime on his own comb
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 09:56 PM by Seabiscuit
Dick Cheney is slime on his own sneer.

Bush is slime on his own smirk.

Rumsfeld is slime on his own shit-eating grin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. There's a song there somewhere - Suggested title? Slime On
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Slime on, slime on Chimpster soon?
Edited on Wed Jul-20-05 10:28 PM by Seabiscuit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Like the article
And this jumped out at me:

In the column, Novak called Plame an "agency operative," thus identifying her as a covert CIA agent. But Novak has since claimed that his use of the phrase "agency operative" was a formulation of his own, and that he did not know, or mean to tell his readers, that she had a covert status with the agency.

Rove, too, has told federal investigators he did not know that Plame had a covert status with the CIA when he spoke with Novak, and Cooper, about Plame.

The distinction as to whether Rove specifically knew Plame’s status has been central to the investigation of U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald; under the law, a government official can only be prosecuted if he or she knew of a person's covert status and "that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent."

But investigators were also skeptical of Novak's claim that his use of the term "operative" was a journalistic miscue because it appeared to provide legal protection for whoever his source or sources were. And although Novak's and Rove's accounts of their conversations regarding Plame were largely consistent, they appeared to be self-serving.


They are looking into whether Novak's language was coached to him by Rove! Even if they could never prove this piece of the puzzle, it's nice to have it out there. Spread it far and wide!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MO_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yep, it just proves
that Novak and most other journalists were taking dictation from Rove/WH. I'll never believe otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is Karl looking at perjury and/or obstruction of justice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kicking for the sheer heck of it! (Thanks for posting!) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. thanks for the kick
interesting stuff in it :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Excellent
Lying to the FBI. The presidents closest advisor lied to the FBI about leaking information on a CIA agent.

Bush can nominate ten justices this week. It won't matter. They are going down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
24. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
25. Excellent!
so who was on the plane and then told Rove? Or did he know long before this memo?...

<snip>

The classified memorandum, dated June 10, 2003, was written by Marc Grossman, then the undersecretary of state for political affairs, and reportedly made claims similar to those made by Wilson: that the Bush administration had relied on faulty intelligence to exaggerate the threat posed by Hussein to make the case to go to war with Iraq. The report was circulated to then-Secretary of State Colin Powell and a slew of other senior administration officials who were then traveling with President Bush to Africa.

Fitzgerald has focused on whether Rove might have learned of Plame's identity from one of the many senior White House officials who read the memo, according to the Times account and attorneys whose clients have testified before the federal grand jury.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
26. What piques an investigator's interest? A changing story
And so far, Rove's story has taken about six turns, as he keeps trying to refine his answer and turn his leaden political dirty trick into a golden instance of selflessness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'm wondering exactly what questions they asked him. Did they let him
dodge or did they force him to a specific answer that would consitute perjury if false?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC